Literature DB >> 30837309

Fast pressure-jump all-atom simulations and experiments reveal site-specific protein dehydration-folding dynamics.

Maxim B Prigozhin1, Yi Zhang2, Klaus Schulten2,3, Martin Gruebele4,2,3, Taras V Pogorelov4,2,5,6.   

Abstract

As theory and experiment have shown, protein dehydration is a major contributor to protein folding. Dehydration upon folding can be characterized directly by all-atom simulations of fast pressure drops, which create desolvated pockets inside the nascent hydrophobic core. Here, we study pressure-drop refolding of three λ-repressor fragment (λ6-85) mutants computationally and experimentally. The three mutants report on tertiary structure formation via different fluorescent helix-helix contact pairs. All-atom simulations of pressure drops capture refolding and unfolding of all three mutants by a similar mechanism, thus validating the nonperturbative nature of the fluorescent contact probes. Analysis of simulated interprobe distances shows that the α-helix 1-3 pair distance displays a slower characteristic time scale than the 1-2 or 3-2 pair distance. To see whether slow packing of α-helices 1 and 3 is reflected in the rate-limiting folding step, fast pressure-drop relaxation experiments captured refolding on a millisecond time scale. These experiments reveal that refolding monitored by 1-3 contact formation indeed is much slower than when monitored by 1-2 or 3-2 contact formation. Unlike the case of the two-state folder [three-α-helix bundle (α3D)], whose drying and core formation proceed in concert, λ6-85 repeatedly dries and rewets different local tertiary contacts before finally forming a solvent-excluded core, explaining the non-two-state behavior observed during refolding in molecular dynamics simulations. This work demonstrates that proteins can explore desolvated pockets and dry globular states numerous times before reaching the native conformation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  molecular dynamics simulation; pressure jump; protein solvation dynamics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30837309      PMCID: PMC6431218          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1814927116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  47 in total

1.  A simple model for calculating the kinetics of protein folding from three-dimensional structures.

Authors:  V Muñoz; W A Eaton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Protein folding mediated by solvation: water expulsion and formation of the hydrophobic core occur after the structural collapse.

Authors:  Margaret S Cheung; Angel E García; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Pressure provides new insights into protein folding, dynamics and structure.

Authors:  J L Silva; D Foguel; C A Royer
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 13.807

4.  Rate-temperature relationships in lambda-repressor fragment lambda 6-85 folding.

Authors:  Wei Yuan Yang; Martin Gruebele
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2004-10-19       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Gaussian split Ewald: A fast Ewald mesh method for molecular simulation.

Authors:  Yibing Shan; John L Klepeis; Michael P Eastwood; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 6.  How well can simulation predict protein folding kinetics and thermodynamics?

Authors:  Christopher D Snow; Eric J Sorin; Young Min Rhee; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2005

Review 7.  Downhill protein folding: evolution meets physics.

Authors:  Martin Gruebele
Journal:  C R Biol       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 1.583

Review 8.  Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly.

Authors:  David Chandler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Mechanisms of tryptophan fluorescence shifts in proteins.

Authors:  J T Vivian; P R Callis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Solvation in protein folding analysis: combination of theoretical and experimental approaches.

Authors:  A M Fernández-Escamilla; M S Cheung; M C Vega; M Wilmanns; J N Onuchic; L Serrano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Initiating Coarse-Grained MD Simulations for Membrane-Bound Proteins.

Authors:  Amanda Buyan; Ben Corry
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  High-pressure small-angle X-ray scattering cell for biological solutions and soft materials.

Authors:  Durgesh K Rai; Richard E Gillilan; Qingqiu Huang; Robert Miller; Edmund Ting; Alexander Lazarev; Mark W Tate; Sol M Gruner
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.304

3.  Biomolecular Modeling and Simulation: A Prospering Multidisciplinary Field.

Authors:  Tamar Schlick; Stephanie Portillo-Ledesma; Christopher G Myers; Lauren Beljak; Justin Chen; Sami Dakhel; Daniel Darling; Sayak Ghosh; Joseph Hall; Mikaeel Jan; Emily Liang; Sera Saju; Mackenzie Vohr; Chris Wu; Yifan Xu; Eva Xue
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 12.981

4.  Threading single proteins through pores to compare their energy landscapes.

Authors:  Prabhat Tripathi; Arash Firouzbakht; Martin Gruebele; Meni Wanunu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 12.779

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.