Literature DB >> 29945805

Unattended versus attended blood pressure measurement: Mean values and determinants of the difference.

Anna Paini1, Fabio Bertacchini1, Deborah Stassaldi1, Carlo Aggiusti1, Giulia Maruelli1, Chiara Arnoldi1, Carolina De Ciuceis1, Claudia Agabiti Rosei1, Damiano Rizzoni2, Roberto Gatta1, Enrico Agabiti Rosei3, Maria Lorenza Muiesan4, Massimo Salvetti5.   

Abstract

Keywords:  AOBP; Automated office blood pressure measurement; Blood pressure measurement; Unattended blood pressure measurement

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29945805     DOI： 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN： 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


× No keyword cloud information.
  11 in total

Review 1.  Automated Office-Based Blood Pressure Measurement: an Overview and Guidance for Implementation in Primary Care.

Authors:  Romsai T Boonyasai; Erika L McCannon; Joseph E Landavaso
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Unattended Automated Office Blood Pressure Measurement and Cardiac Target Organ Damage, A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Claudia Palomba; Simone Donadio; Grazia Canciello; Maria Angela Losi; Raffaele Izzo; Maria Virginia Manzi; Federica De Pisapia; Costantino Mancusi; Nicola De Luca
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2019-08-23

3.  2022 Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology and the Taiwan Hypertension Society for the Management of Hypertension.

Authors:  Tzung-Dau Wang; Chern-En Chiang; Ting-Hsing Chao; Hao-Min Cheng; Yen-Wen Wu; Yih-Jer Wu; Yen-Hung Lin; Michael Yu-Chih Chen; Kwo-Chang Ueng; Wei-Ting Chang; Ying-Hsiang Lee; Yu-Chen Wang; Pao-Hsien Chu; Tzu-Fan Chao; Hsien-Li Kao; Charles Jia-Yin Hou; Tsung-Hsien Lin
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 1.800

4.  Identifying and treating resistant hypertension in PRECISION: A randomized long-term clinical trial with aprocitentan.

Authors:  Parisa Danaietash; Pierre Verweij; Ji-Guang Wang; George Dresser; Ilkka Kantola; Mary Katherine Lawrence; Krzysztof Narkiewicz; Markus Schlaich; Marc Bellet
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.885

5.  Unattended versus attended automated office blood pressure: Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using the same methodology for both methods.

Authors:  Anastasios Kollias; Emelina Stambolliu; Konstantinos G Kyriakoulis; Areti Gravvani; George S Stergiou
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2018-12-25       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  A meta-analysis helps to clarify the use of automated office blood pressure in clinical practice.

Authors:  Anastasios Kollias; Emelina Stambolliu; Konstantinos G Kyriakoulis; Areti Gravvani; George S Stergiou
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  A meta-analysis that helps clarify the use of automated office blood pressure in clinical practice.

Authors:  Martin G Myers
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 8.  The optimal use of automated office blood pressure measurement in clinical practice.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Andreadis; Charalampia V Geladari; Epameinondas T Angelopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Attended vs unattended systolic blood pressure measurement: A randomized comparison in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Ellen C Keeley; Matthew Villanueva; Yiqing E Chen; Yan Gong; Eileen M Handberg; Steven M Smith; Carl J Pepine; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Blood pressure measurement: Should technique define targets?

Authors:  Swapnil Hiremath; Tim Ramsay; Marcel Ruzicka
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.738
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.