Literature DB >> 30833487

Referrals to a Phase I Clinic and Trial Enrollment in the Molecular Screening Era.

Tira Tan1, Michael Rheaume1, Lisa Wang2, Helen Chow3, Anna Spreafico1,3, Aaron R Hansen1,3, Albiruni R A Razak1,3, Lillian L Siu1,3, Philippe L Bedard4,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enrichment of patients based on molecular biomarkers is increasingly used in early phase clinical trials. Molecular profiling of patients with advanced cancers can identify specific genomic alterations to inform decisions about investigational treatment(s). Our aim was to evaluate the outcomes of new patient referrals to a large academic solid tumor phase I clinical trial program after the implementation of molecular profiling.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all new referrals to the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PM) phase I clinic from May 2012 to December 2014. Molecular profiling using either MALDI-TOF hotspot mutation genotyping or targeted panel DNA sequencing was performed for patients at PM or community hospitals through the institutional IMPACT/COMPACT trials.
RESULTS: A total of 971 new patient referrals were included for this analysis. Twenty-seven percent of referrals assessed in clinic were subsequently enrolled in phase I trials. Of all new referrals, 41% had prior molecular profiling, of whom 11% (n = 42) were enrolled in genotype-matched trials. Patients with prior molecular profiling were younger, more heavily pretreated, and had more favorable Princess Margaret Hospital Index (PMHI) scores. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1 (p = .002), internal referrals within PM (p = .002), and PMHI (p ≤ .001) were independently associated with successful trial enrollment in multivariable analysis.
CONCLUSION: Although nearly half of new patients referred to a phase I clinic had prior molecular profiling, the proportion subsequently enrolled into clinical trials was low. Prior molecular profiling was not an independent predictor of clinical trial enrollment. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The landscape of oncology drug development is evolving alongside technological advancements. Recently, large academic medical centers have implemented clinical sequencing protocols to identify patients with actionable genomic alterations to enroll in therapeutic clinical trials. This study evaluates patient referral and enrollment patterns in a large academic phase I clinical trials program following the implementation of a molecular profiling program. Performance status and referral from a physician within the institution were associated with successful trial enrollment, whereas prior molecular profiling was not an independent predictor. © AlphaMed Press 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trial; Genotype; Neoplasms; Patient selection; Phase I; Referral and consultation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30833487      PMCID: PMC6656436          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  24 in total

Review 1.  Why patients don't take part in cancer clinical trials: an overview of the literature.

Authors:  K Cox; J McGarry
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.520

2.  Impact of a Biomarker-Based Strategy on Oncology Drug Development: A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials Leading to FDA Approval.

Authors:  Denis L Jardim; Denis L Fontes Jardim; Maria Schwaederle; Caimiao Wei; J Jack Lee; David S Hong; Alexander M Eggermont; Richard L Schilsky; John Mendelsohn; Vladimir Lazar; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Organisational factors influencing early clinical trials enrollment: Gustave Roussy experience.

Authors:  Sylvain Besle; Emilien Schultz; Antoine Hollebecque; Andreea Varga; Capucine Baldini; Patricia Martin; Sophie Postel-Vinay; Rastislav Bahleda; Anas Gazzah; Jean-Marie Michot; Aurélien Marabelle; Eric Angevin; Jean-Pierre Armand; Vincent Ribrag; Jean-Charles Soria; Christophe Massard
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Comparative genomic hybridisation array and DNA sequencing to direct treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a multicentre, prospective trial (SAFIR01/UNICANCER).

Authors:  Fabrice André; Thomas Bachelot; Frederic Commo; Mario Campone; Monica Arnedos; Véronique Dieras; Magali Lacroix-Triki; Ludovic Lacroix; Pascale Cohen; David Gentien; Jose Adélaide; Florence Dalenc; Anthony Goncalves; Christelle Levy; Jean-Marc Ferrero; Jacques Bonneterre; Claudia Lefeuvre; Marta Jimenez; Thomas Filleron; Hervé Bonnefoi
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Keith T Flaherty; Igor Puzanov; Kevin B Kim; Antoni Ribas; Grant A McArthur; Jeffrey A Sosman; Peter J O'Dwyer; Richard J Lee; Joseph F Grippo; Keith Nolop; Paul B Chapman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Feasibility of Large-Scale Genomic Testing to Facilitate Enrollment Onto Genomically Matched Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Funda Meric-Bernstam; Lauren Brusco; Kenna Shaw; Chacha Horombe; Scott Kopetz; Michael A Davies; Mark Routbort; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Filip Janku; Naoto Ueno; David Hong; John De Groot; Vinod Ravi; Yisheng Li; Raja Luthra; Keyur Patel; Russell Broaddus; John Mendelsohn; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The Challenge for Development of Valuable Immuno-oncology Biomarkers.

Authors:  Janice M Mehnert; Arta M Monjazeb; Johanna M T Beerthuijzen; Deborah Collyar; Larry Rubinstein; Lyndsay N Harris
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Identification of factors limiting patient recruitment into phase I trials: a study from the Royal Marsden Hospital.

Authors:  Vasilios Karavasilis; Laurence Digue; Tobias Arkenau; David Eaton; Sarah Stapleton; Johann de Bono; Ian Judson; Stan Kaye
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Prospective validation of a prognostic score to improve patient selection for oncology phase I trials.

Authors:  Hendrik-Tobias Arkenau; Jorge Barriuso; David Olmos; Joo Ern Ang; Johann de Bono; Ian Judson; Stan Kaye
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Molecular profiling of advanced solid tumors and patient outcomes with genotype-matched clinical trials: the Princess Margaret IMPACT/COMPACT trial.

Authors:  Tracy L Stockley; Amit M Oza; Hal K Berman; Natasha B Leighl; Jennifer J Knox; Frances A Shepherd; Eric X Chen; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Neesha Dhani; Anthony M Joshua; Ming-Sound Tsao; Stefano Serra; Blaise Clarke; Michael H Roehrl; Tong Zhang; Mahadeo A Sukhai; Nadia Califaretti; Mateya Trinkaus; Patricia Shaw; Theodorus van der Kwast; Lisa Wang; Carl Virtanen; Raymond H Kim; Albiruni R A Razak; Aaron R Hansen; Celeste Yu; Trevor J Pugh; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Lillian L Siu; Philippe L Bedard
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.