PURPOSE: We report the experience with 2,000 consecutive patients with advanced cancer who underwent testing on a genomic testing protocol, including the frequency of actionable alterations across tumor types, subsequent enrollment onto clinical trials, and the challenges for trial enrollment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Standardized hotspot mutation analysis was performed in 2,000 patients, using either an 11-gene (251 patients) or a 46- or 50-gene (1,749 patients) multiplex platform. Thirty-five genes were considered potentially actionable based on their potential to be targeted with approved or investigational therapies. RESULTS: Seven hundred eighty-nine patients (39%) had at least one mutation in potentially actionable genes. Eighty-three patients (11%) with potentially actionable mutations went on genotype-matched trials targeting these alterations. Of 230 patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN/BRAF mutations that returned for therapy, 116 (50%) received a genotype-matched drug. Forty patients (17%) were treated on a genotype-selected trial requiring a mutation for eligibility, 16 (7%) were treated on a genotype-relevant trial targeting a genomic alteration without biomarker selection, and 40 (17%) received a genotype-relevant drug off trial. Challenges to trial accrual included patient preference of noninvestigational treatment or local treatment, poor performance status or other reasons for trial ineligibility, lack of trials/slots, and insurance denial. CONCLUSION: Broad implementation of multiplex hotspot testing is feasible; however, only a small portion of patients with actionable alterations were actually enrolled onto genotype-matched trials. Increased awareness of therapeutic implications and access to novel therapeutics are needed to optimally leverage results from broad-based genomic testing.
PURPOSE: We report the experience with 2,000 consecutive patients with advanced cancer who underwent testing on a genomic testing protocol, including the frequency of actionable alterations across tumor types, subsequent enrollment onto clinical trials, and the challenges for trial enrollment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Standardized hotspot mutation analysis was performed in 2,000 patients, using either an 11-gene (251 patients) or a 46- or 50-gene (1,749 patients) multiplex platform. Thirty-five genes were considered potentially actionable based on their potential to be targeted with approved or investigational therapies. RESULTS: Seven hundred eighty-nine patients (39%) had at least one mutation in potentially actionable genes. Eighty-three patients (11%) with potentially actionable mutations went on genotype-matched trials targeting these alterations. Of 230 patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN/BRAF mutations that returned for therapy, 116 (50%) received a genotype-matched drug. Forty patients (17%) were treated on a genotype-selected trial requiring a mutation for eligibility, 16 (7%) were treated on a genotype-relevant trial targeting a genomic alteration without biomarker selection, and 40 (17%) received a genotype-relevant drug off trial. Challenges to trial accrual included patient preference of noninvestigational treatment or local treatment, poor performance status or other reasons for trial ineligibility, lack of trials/slots, and insurance denial. CONCLUSION: Broad implementation of multiplex hotspot testing is feasible; however, only a small portion of patients with actionable alterations were actually enrolled onto genotype-matched trials. Increased awareness of therapeutic implications and access to novel therapeutics are needed to optimally leverage results from broad-based genomic testing.
Authors: Mark G Kris; Bruce E Johnson; Lynne D Berry; David J Kwiatkowski; A John Iafrate; Ignacio I Wistuba; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Wilbur A Franklin; Samuel L Aronson; Pei-Fang Su; Yu Shyr; D Ross Camidge; Lecia V Sequist; Bonnie S Glisson; Fadlo R Khuri; Edward B Garon; William Pao; Charles Rudin; Joan Schiller; Eric B Haura; Mark Socinski; Keisuke Shirai; Heidi Chen; Giuseppe Giaccone; Marc Ladanyi; Kelly Kugler; John D Minna; Paul A Bunn Journal: JAMA Date: 2014-05-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ian S Hagemann; Siddhartha Devarakonda; Christina M Lockwood; David H Spencer; Kalin Guebert; Andrew J Bredemeyer; Hussam Al-Kateb; TuDung T Nguyen; Eric J Duncavage; Catherine E Cottrell; Shashikant Kulkarni; Rakesh Nagarajan; Karen Seibert; Maria Baggstrom; Saiama N Waqar; John D Pfeifer; Daniel Morgensztern; Ramaswamy Govindan Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Funda Meric-Bernstam; Garrett M Frampton; Jaime Ferrer-Lozano; Roman Yelensky; Jose A Pérez-Fidalgo; Ying Wang; Gary A Palmer; Jeffrey S Ross; Vincent A Miller; Xiaoping Su; Pilar Eroles; Juan Antonio Barrera; Octavio Burgues; Ana M Lluch; Xiaofeng Zheng; Aysegul Sahin; Philip J Stephens; Gordon B Mills; Maureen T Cronin; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Douglas B Johnson; Kimberly H Dahlman; Jared Knol; Jill Gilbert; Igor Puzanov; Julie Means-Powell; Justin M Balko; Christine M Lovly; Barbara A Murphy; Laura W Goff; Vandana G Abramson; Marta A Crispens; Ingrid A Mayer; Jordan D Berlin; Leora Horn; Vicki L Keedy; Nishitha M Reddy; Carlos L Arteaga; Jeffrey A Sosman; William Pao Journal: Oncologist Date: 2014-05-05
Authors: Rajesh R Singh; Keyur P Patel; Mark J Routbort; Neelima G Reddy; Bedia A Barkoh; Brian Handal; Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna; Wesley O Greaves; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Kenneth D Aldape; Rajyalakshmi Luthra Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Garrett M Frampton; Alex Fichtenholtz; Geoff A Otto; Kai Wang; Sean R Downing; Jie He; Michael Schnall-Levin; Jared White; Eric M Sanford; Peter An; James Sun; Frank Juhn; Kristina Brennan; Kiel Iwanik; Ashley Maillet; Jamie Buell; Emily White; Mandy Zhao; Sohail Balasubramanian; Selmira Terzic; Tina Richards; Vera Banning; Lazaro Garcia; Kristen Mahoney; Zac Zwirko; Amy Donahue; Himisha Beltran; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Mark A Rubin; Snjezana Dogan; Cyrus V Hedvat; Michael F Berger; Lajos Pusztai; Matthias Lechner; Chris Boshoff; Mirna Jarosz; Christine Vietz; Alex Parker; Vincent A Miller; Jeffrey S Ross; John Curran; Maureen T Cronin; Philip J Stephens; Doron Lipson; Roman Yelensky Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2013-10-20 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Christine M Lovly; Kimberly Brown Dahlman; Laurel E Fohn; Zengliu Su; Dora Dias-Santagata; Donna J Hicks; Donald Hucks; Elizabeth Berry; Charles Terry; MarKeesa Duke; Yingjun Su; Tammy Sobolik-Delmaire; Ann Richmond; Mark C Kelley; Cindy L Vnencak-Jones; A John Iafrate; Jeffrey Sosman; William Pao Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Jonathan M Loree; Allan A L Pereira; Michael Lam; Alexandra N Willauer; Kanwal Raghav; Arvind Dasari; Van K Morris; Shailesh Advani; David G Menter; Cathy Eng; Kenna Shaw; Russell Broaddus; Mark J Routbort; Yusha Liu; Jeffrey S Morris; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Michael J Overman; Dipen Maru; Scott Kopetz Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: E R Malone; R R Saleh; C Yu; L Ahmed; T Pugh; J Torchia; J Bartlett; C Virtanen; S J Hotte; J Hilton; S Welch; A Robinson; E McCready; B Lo; B Sadikovic; H Feilotter; T P Hanna; S Kamel-Reid; T L Stockley; L L Siu; P L Bedard Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Patrick R Benusiglio; Marina Di Maria; Leila Dorling; Anne Jouinot; Antoine Poli; Sophie Villebasse; Marine Le Mentec; Béatrice Claret; Diane Boinon; Olivier Caron Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 2.375