Literature DB >> 30833375

Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the TODAY Study.

Ruth S Weinstock1, Barbara H Braffett2, Paul McGuigan3, Mary E Larkin4, Nisha B Grover5, Natalie Walders-Abramson6, Lori M Laffel7, Christine L Chan6, Nancy Chang8, Beth E Schwartzman9, Rose Ann Barajas10, Nicole Celona-Jacobs6, Morey W Haymond11.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is associated with lower HbA1c in youth with type 2 diabetes taking oral medications only or after starting insulin for persistently elevated HbA1c. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) study participants (n = 699) taking oral medications were asked to perform SMBG twice daily. After reaching primary outcome (PO) (HbA1c ≥8% [64 mmol/mol]) over 6 months or an inability to wean from temporary insulin because of metabolic decompensation), insulin glargine was started. HbA1c and percent of SMBG (SMBG%) (percent days when the meter was used one or more times) before and after PO were analyzed.
RESULTS: SMBG declined over time and was inversely related to HbA1c (P < 0.0001). Of 298 youth who reached PO and started insulin, 282 had SMBG data. At PO, mean ± SD age was 15.8 ± 2.3 years, BMI 35.5 ± 7.9 kg/m2, and HbA1c 9.6 ± 2.0% (81 ± 21.9 mmol/mol); 65.3% were female. Median SMBG% was 40% at PO, which increased to 49% after 6 months and fell to 41% after 1 year on insulin. At PO, 22% of youth checked ≥80% of days, which increased to 25% and fell to 19% after 6 and 12 months using insulin, respectively. At PO, compared with those who checked <80%, youth who checked ≥80% were younger and with a lower BMI, HbA1c, and blood pressure. SMBG ≥80% was associated with ≥1% reduction in HbA1c at 6 and 12 months after insulin initiation.
CONCLUSIONS: Low SMBG adherence was common and associated with higher HbA1c. Optimal SMBG frequency in youth using or not using insulin, and whether less frequent SMBG is a marker for overall worse self-care, require further study.
© 2019 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30833375      PMCID: PMC6489117          DOI: 10.2337/dc18-1854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  25 in total

1.  Counterpoint: Self-monitoring of blood glucose in type 2 diabetic patients not receiving insulin: a waste of money.

Authors:  Mayer B Davidson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Correlates of Medication Adherence in the TODAY Cohort of Youth With Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Lorraine Levitt Katz; Barbara J Anderson; Siripoom V McKay; Roberto Izquierdo; Terri L Casey; Laurie A Higgins; Aimee Wauters; Kathryn Hirst; Kristen J Nadeau
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Metformin monotherapy in youth with recent onset type 2 diabetes: experience from the prerandomization run-in phase of the TODAY study.

Authors:  Lori Laffel; Nancy Chang; Margaret Grey; Dan Hale; Laurie Higgins; Kathryn Hirst; Roberto Izquierdo; Mary Larkin; Christina Macha; Trang Pham; Aimee Wauters; Ruth S Weinstock
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 4.866

4.  Effects of Structured Versus Unstructured Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose on Glucose Control in Patients With Non-insulin-treated Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Edoardo Mannucci; Alessandro Antenore; Francesco Giorgino; Marina Scavini
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-07-12

5.  A clinical trial to maintain glycemic control in youth with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Phil Zeitler; Kathryn Hirst; Laura Pyle; Barbara Linder; Kenneth Copeland; Silva Arslanian; Leona Cuttler; David M Nathan; Sherida Tollefsen; Denise Wilfley; Francine Kaufman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Self-monitoring of blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are not using insulin.

Authors:  Uriëll L Malanda; Laura M C Welschen; Ingrid I Riphagen; Jacqueline M Dekker; Giel Nijpels; Sandra D M Bot
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-01-18

7.  Treatment options for type 2 diabetes in adolescents and youth: a study of the comparative efficacy of metformin alone or in combination with rosiglitazone or lifestyle intervention in adolescents with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  P Zeitler; L Epstein; M Grey; K Hirst; F Kaufman; W Tamborlane; D Wilfley
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.866

8.  Reduction in self-monitoring of blood glucose in persons with type 2 diabetes results in cost savings and no change in glycemic control.

Authors:  Joy L Meier; Arthur L M Swislocki; Julio R Lopez; Robert H Noth; Patricia Bartlebaugh; David Siegel
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Overcoming Clinical Inertia: A Randomized Clinical Trial of a Telehealth Remote Monitoring Intervention Using Paired Glucose Testing in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Deborah A Greenwood; Shelley A Blozis; Heather M Young; Thomas S Nesbitt; Charlene C Quinn
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Intensive structured self-monitoring of blood glucose and glycemic control in noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes: the PRISMA randomized trial.

Authors:  Emanuele Bosi; Marina Scavini; Antonio Ceriello; Domenico Cucinotta; Antonio Tiengo; Raffaele Marino; Erminio Bonizzoni; Francesco Giorgino
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  3 in total

1.  Health Care Coverage and Glycemic Control in Young Adults With Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the TODAY2 Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Clinical Inertia and 2-Year Glycaemic Trajectories in Patients with Non-Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ling-Wang An; Xiang-Lan Li; Lin-Hui Chen; Hong Tang; Qun Yuan; Yan-Jun Liu; Yu Ji; Ju-Ming Lu
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Sex-Specific Associations Between Low Muscle Mass and Glucose Fluctuations in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Xiulin Shi; Wenjuan Liu; Lulu Zhang; Fangsen Xiao; Peiying Huang; Bing Yan; Yiping Zhang; Weijuan Su; Qiuhui Jiang; Mingzhu Lin; Wei Liu; Xuejun Li
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 6.055

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.