Edoardo Mannucci1, Alessandro Antenore1, Francesco Giorgino2, Marina Scavini3. 1. 1 Diabetes Agency, Careggi Teaching Hospital, Florence, Italy. 2. 2 Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Section of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, Andrology and Metabolic Diseases, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy. 3. 3 Diabetes Research Institute, San Raffaele Hospital & Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes is debated. Meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) suggest a small reduction of HbA1c in patients using SMBG, without considering potential confounders, such as SMBG regimen and use of SMBG data to adjust diabetes medications. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed including RCTs in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, with an intervention of ≥24 weeks and HbA1c as the primary endpoint, to verify the effect of SMBG (vs no monitoring), structured SMBG (vs unstructured), and of SMBG-driven therapy adjustments. RESULTS: In RCTs (n = 8) comparing SMBG with no SMBG (1277 and 1072 patients, respectively), SMBG reduced HbA1c by -0.17% (95% CI -0.25 to -0.09%, P < .003). The reduction in HbA1c was greater in RCTs (n = 3) in which SMBG data were used to adjust diabetes medications (HbA1c decrease: -0.3% [95% CI -0.49 to -0.1%]) than in RCTs (n = 6) where SMBG data were not used for this purpose (HbA1c decrease: -0.1% [95% CI -0.2 to 0.0%]) ( P < .005). In the RCTs comparing structured and unstructured SMBG (757 and 750 patients, respectively), in which structured SMBG data were also used to adjust diabetes medications, the HbA1c difference between groups at study end was -0.27% (95% CI -0.49 to -0.04%, P < .018). CONCLUSIONS: In RCTs performed in non-insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes, SMBG is associated with a significant, although small, reduction in HbA1c. HbA1c reduction was greater with structured SMBG and when structured SMBG data were used to adjust diabetes therapy.
BACKGROUND: The use of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes is debated. Meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) suggest a small reduction of HbA1c in patients using SMBG, without considering potential confounders, such as SMBG regimen and use of SMBG data to adjust diabetes medications. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed including RCTs in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, with an intervention of ≥24 weeks and HbA1c as the primary endpoint, to verify the effect of SMBG (vs no monitoring), structured SMBG (vs unstructured), and of SMBG-driven therapy adjustments. RESULTS: In RCTs (n = 8) comparing SMBG with no SMBG (1277 and 1072 patients, respectively), SMBG reduced HbA1c by -0.17% (95% CI -0.25 to -0.09%, P < .003). The reduction in HbA1c was greater in RCTs (n = 3) in which SMBG data were used to adjust diabetes medications (HbA1c decrease: -0.3% [95% CI -0.49 to -0.1%]) than in RCTs (n = 6) where SMBG data were not used for this purpose (HbA1c decrease: -0.1% [95% CI -0.2 to 0.0%]) ( P < .005). In the RCTs comparing structured and unstructured SMBG (757 and 750 patients, respectively), in which structured SMBG data were also used to adjust diabetes medications, the HbA1c difference between groups at study end was -0.27% (95% CI -0.49 to -0.04%, P < .018). CONCLUSIONS: In RCTs performed in non-insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes, SMBG is associated with a significant, although small, reduction in HbA1c. HbA1c reduction was greater with structured SMBG and when structured SMBG data were used to adjust diabetes therapy.
Entities:
Keywords:
meta-analysis; non–insulin treated; self-monitoring of blood glucose; treatment algorithms; type 2 diabetes
Authors: N Kleefstra; J Hortensius; S J J Logtenberg; R J Slingerland; K H Groenier; S T Houweling; R O B Gans; E van Ballegooie; H J G Bilo Journal: Neth J Med Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 1.422
Authors: Andrew Farmer; Alisha Wade; Elizabeth Goyder; Patricia Yudkin; David French; Anthea Craven; Rury Holman; Ann-Louise Kinmonth; Andrew Neil Journal: BMJ Date: 2007-06-25
Authors: William H Polonsky; Lawrence Fisher; Charles H Schikman; Deborah A Hinnen; Christopher G Parkin; Zhihong Jelsovsky; Bettina Petersen; Matthias Schweitzer; Robin S Wagner Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Itamar Raz; Matthew C Riddle; Julio Rosenstock; John B Buse; Silvio E Inzucchi; Philip D Home; Stefano Del Prato; Ele Ferrannini; Juliana C N Chan; Lawrence A Leiter; Derek Leroith; Ralph Defronzo; William T Cefalu Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Melanie J Davies; Vanita R Aroda; Billy S Collins; Robert A Gabbay; Jennifer Green; Nisa M Maruthur; Sylvia E Rosas; Stefano Del Prato; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Tsvetalina Tankova; Apostolos Tsapas; John B Buse Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2022-09-24 Impact factor: 10.460
Authors: Melanie J Davies; David A D'Alessio; Judith Fradkin; Walter N Kernan; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Apostolos Tsapas; Deborah J Wexler; John B Buse Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Ruth S Weinstock; Barbara H Braffett; Paul McGuigan; Mary E Larkin; Nisha B Grover; Natalie Walders-Abramson; Lori M Laffel; Christine L Chan; Nancy Chang; Beth E Schwartzman; Rose Ann Barajas; Nicole Celona-Jacobs; Morey W Haymond Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Katharina Fritzen; Kornelia Basinska; Constantin Stautner; Karl F Braun; Matilde Rubio-Almanza; Antonio Nicolucci; Brian Kennon; Bruno Vergès; Yasser Hosny; Oliver Schnell Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2019-08-06