Literature DB >> 30832778

Camouflage pattern features interact with movement speed to determine human target detectability.

Tad T Brunyé1, Shaina B Martis2, John A Kirejczyk3, Kathryn Rock3.   

Abstract

Applied ergonomics research examines not only the fit, form and function of military uniforms, but also their ability to effectively camouflage personnel as they perform job-related tasks. Many of these job-related tasks involve moving through environments, but existing literature examining camouflage effectiveness often assumes that movement effectively "breaks" even the best camouflage patterns, rendering them of limited utility for reducing the visual signature of a moving target. However, recent research demonstrates that animals equipped with adaptive camouflage change their patterning in predictable ways during movement and this adaptation decreases detectability, suggesting that uniform patterning may still hold value for reducing conspicuity during movement. The present experiment examined whether three visual pattern characteristics, local contrast, orientation, and spatial frequency, would influence the detectability of a moving human target. Participants attempted to detect and localize a simulated human target moving across a background scene, and a factorial design varied target movement speed, and the local contrast, spatial frequency, and orientation of its camouflage patterning. Results showed that target detectability was strongly influenced by target movement rate, pattern local contrast, and pattern spatial frequency, and these effects persisted even under conditions of very fast movement. Importantly, we found that the effect of local contrast was most robust under conditions of movement, suggesting its importance for reducing detectability of moving personnel. We conclude that movement is not always sufficient to break the concealment offered by a pattern with low contrast and a spatial frequency match with its background. Results are discussed in the context of visual processing theories and the application of these findings to the design and development of static and adaptive camouflage patterns for military personnel. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Camouflage; Pattern features; Visual perception; Visual salience

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30832778     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  3 in total

1.  In the corner of the eye: camouflaging motion in the peripheral visual field.

Authors:  Ioan E Smart; Innes C Cuthill; Nicholas E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The measure of spatial position within groups that best predicts predation risk depends on group movement.

Authors:  Poppy J Lambert; James E Herbert-Read; Christos C Ioannou
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  Underwater caustics disrupt prey detection by a reef fish.

Authors:  S R Matchette; I C Cuthill; K L Cheney; N J Marshall; N E Scott-Samuel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 5.349

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.