Nancy L Waltman1, Kara M Smith, Kevin A Kupzyk, Joan M Lappe, Lynn R Mack, Laura D Bilek. 1. Nancy L. Waltman, PhD, APRN-CNP, is Professor, College of Nursing, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln. Kara M. Smith, MS, is Project Study Coordinator, College of Allied Health Professions, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha. Kevin A. Kupzyk, PhD, is Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha. Joan M. Lappe, PhD, RN, FAAN, is Professor, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska. Lynn R. Mack, MD, is Associate Professor, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha. Laura D. Bilek, PhD, PT, is Associate Professor, College of Allied Health Professions, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few researchers have focused on the challenges of recruiting postmenopausal women for community-based research. Researchers have reported that multiple methods may be needed to recruit the required number of subjects. One contemporary approach to recruitment is use of Facebook. More studies are needed examining Facebook as a recruitment strategy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine which recruitment methods were most successful and cost-effective in recruiting postmenopausal women for a randomized controlled trial on bone loss. METHODS:Subjects were 276 postmenopausal women who had osteopenia and were within 5 years of menopause. Multiple methods were used to recruit women. To determine which methods were successful, women were asked how they learned about the study. Descriptive data were used to examine recruitment numbers as well as to determine the cost-effectiveness and enrollment efficiency of recruitment methods. RESULTS: Healthcare provider letters yielded the highest number of enrolled subjects (n = 58), followed by postcard mailings (n = 47), and Facebook posts (n = 44). Eleven subjects were referred by family and friends, five subjects were from newspaper or television, and two were from digital ads. Cost of recruitment per subject enrolled was highest with digital ads and postcard mailings. DISCUSSION: Recruitment could be more costly and time-consuming than anticipated. Recruitment using direct-targeted mailings, such as provider letters and postcards, was successful in our study and has been effective in previous studies reviewed. Facebook was successful for recruitment in our study and may continue to be useful for recruitment in the future, as the number of women accessing Facebook continues to increase.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Few researchers have focused on the challenges of recruiting postmenopausal women for community-based research. Researchers have reported that multiple methods may be needed to recruit the required number of subjects. One contemporary approach to recruitment is use of Facebook. More studies are needed examining Facebook as a recruitment strategy. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to examine which recruitment methods were most successful and cost-effective in recruiting postmenopausal women for a randomized controlled trial on bone loss. METHODS: Subjects were 276 postmenopausal women who had osteopenia and were within 5 years of menopause. Multiple methods were used to recruit women. To determine which methods were successful, women were asked how they learned about the study. Descriptive data were used to examine recruitment numbers as well as to determine the cost-effectiveness and enrollment efficiency of recruitment methods. RESULTS: Healthcare provider letters yielded the highest number of enrolled subjects (n = 58), followed by postcard mailings (n = 47), and Facebook posts (n = 44). Eleven subjects were referred by family and friends, five subjects were from newspaper or television, and two were from digital ads. Cost of recruitment per subject enrolled was highest with digital ads and postcard mailings. DISCUSSION: Recruitment could be more costly and time-consuming than anticipated. Recruitment using direct-targeted mailings, such as provider letters and postcards, was successful in our study and has been effective in previous studies reviewed. Facebook was successful for recruitment in our study and may continue to be useful for recruitment in the future, as the number of women accessing Facebook continues to increase.
Authors: Candi C Bachour; Gloria A Bachmann; David C Foster; Jim Y Wan; Leslie A Rawlinson; Candace S Brown Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: T M Stewart; M Bhapkar; S Das; K Galan; C K Martin; L McAdams; C Pieper; L Redman; S Roberts; R I Stein; J Rochon; D A Williamson Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Stacy N Davis; Swapamthi Govindaraju; Brittany Jackson; Kimberly R Williams; Shannon M Christy; Susan T Vadaparampil; Gwendolyn P Quinn; David Shibata; Richard Roetzheim; Cathy D Meade; Clement K Gwede Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2018 May/Jun Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: N L Waltman; J J Twiss; C D Ott; G J Gross; A M Lindsey; T E Moore; K Berg; K Kupzyk Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2009-10-03 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Juliet M Foster; Susan M Sawyer; Lorraine Smith; Helen K Reddel; Tim Usherwood Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Nancy Waltman; Kevin A Kupzyk; Laura E Flores; Lynn R Mack; Joan M Lappe; Laura D Bilek Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Amanda L Baker; Kristen McCarter; Lisa Brophy; David Castle; Peter J Kelly; Nadine Cocks; Melissa L McKinlay; Catherine Brasier; Ron Borland; Billie Bonevski; Catherine Segan; Donita E Baird; Alyna Turner; Jill M Williams; Erin Forbes; Laura Hayes; John Attia; David Lambkin; Daniel Barker; Rohan Sweeney Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas; Luis Castelo-Branco; Kevin Pacheco-Barrios; Emad Salman Shaikh; Elif Uygur-Kucukseymen; Stefano Giannoni-Luza; Luna Vasconcelos Felippe; Paola Gonzalez-Mego; Maria Alejandra Luna-Cuadros; Anna Carolyna Lepesteur Gianlorenco; Paulo E P Teixeira; Wolnei Caumo; Felipe Fregni Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Commun Date: 2021-11-17
Authors: Ida Darmawan; Caitlin Bakker; Tabetha A Brockman; Christi A Patten; Milton Eder Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-10-26 Impact factor: 5.428