Literature DB >> 27488223

Recruitment methods in a clinical trial of provoked vulvodynia: Predictors of enrollment.

Candi C Bachour1, Gloria A Bachmann2, David C Foster3, Jim Y Wan4, Leslie A Rawlinson1, Candace S Brown1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Successful recruitment in clinical trials for chronic pain conditions is challenging, especially in women with provoked vulvodynia due to reluctance in discussing pain associated with sexual intercourse. The most successful recruitment methods and the characteristics of women reached with these methods are unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and efficiency of four recruitment methods and to determine socioeconomic predictors for successful enrollment in a National Institutes of Health-sponsored multicenter clinical trial evaluating a gabapentin intervention in women with provoked vulvodynia.
METHODS: Recruitment methods utilized mass mailing, media, clinician referrals and community outreach. Effectiveness (number of participants enrolled) and efficiency (proportion screened who enrolled) were determined. Socioeconomic variables including race, educational level, annual household income, relationship status, age, menopausal status and employment status were also evaluated regarding which recruitment strategies were best at targeting specific cohorts.
RESULTS: Of 868 potential study participants, 219 were enrolled. The most effective recruitment method in enrolling participants was mass mailing ( p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in efficiency between recruitment methods ( p = 0.11). Relative to clinician referral, black women were 13 times as likely to be enrolled through mass mailing (adjusted odds ratio 12.5, 95% confidence interval, 3.6-43.1) as white women. There were no differences in enrollment according to educational level, annual income, relationship status, age, menopausal status, or employment status and recruitment method.
CONCLUSION: In this clinical trial, mass mailing was the most effective recruitment method. Race of participants enrolled in a provoked vulvodynia trial was related to the recruitment method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Recruitment methods; predictors; provoked vulvodynia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27488223      PMCID: PMC5290291          DOI: 10.1177/1740774516663461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  28 in total

1.  The Women's Health Initiative recruitment methods and results.

Authors:  Jennifer Hays; Julie R Hunt; F Allan Hubbell; Garnet L Anderson; Marian Limacher; Catherine Allen; Jacques E Rossouw
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Bias.

Authors:  Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez; Javier Llorca
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Cromolyn cream for recalcitrant idiopathic vulvar vestibulitis: results of a placebo controlled study.

Authors:  P Nyirjesy; J D Sobel; M V Weitz; D J Leaman; M J Small; S P Gelone
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Reliability and validity of self-reported symptoms for predicting vulvodynia.

Authors:  Barbara D Reed; Hope K Haefner; Siobán D Harlow; Daniel W Gorenflo; Ananda Sen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Prevalence and demographic characteristics of vulvodynia in a population-based sample.

Authors:  Barbara Diane Reed; Siobán Denise Harlow; Ananda Sen; Laurie Jo Legocki; Rayna Monique Edwards; Nora Arato; Hope Katharine Haefner
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Locating pain in breast cancer survivors experiencing dyspareunia: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Martha F Goetsch; Jeong Y Lim; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Enoxaparin treatment for vulvodynia: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yaniv Farajun; Doron Zarfati; Liora Abramov; Alejandro Livoff; Jacob Bornstein
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a novel cognitive-behavioral couple therapy for provoked vestibulodynia: a pilot study.

Authors:  Serena Corsini-Munt; Sophie Bergeron; Natalie O Rosen; Marie-Hélène Mayrand; Isabelle Delisle
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.802

9.  Reporting the recruitment process in clinical trials: who are these patients and how did they get there?

Authors:  Cary P Gross; Raburn Mallory; Asefeh Heiat; Harlan M Krumholz
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-07-02       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Physician participation in clinical research and trials: issues and approaches.

Authors:  Sayeeda Rahman; Md Anwarul Azim Majumder; Sami F Shaban; Nuzhat Rahman; Moslehuddin Ahmed; Khalid Bin Abdulrahman; Urban Ja D'Souza
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2011-03-07
View more
  2 in total

1.  Exploring Willingness to Participate in Clinical Trials by Ethnicity.

Authors:  Katrina L Pariera; Sheila T Murphy; Jingbo Meng; Margaret L McLaughlin
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-09-07

2.  Approaches to Recruitment of Postmenopausal Women for a Community-Based Study.

Authors:  Nancy L Waltman; Kara M Smith; Kevin A Kupzyk; Joan M Lappe; Lynn R Mack; Laura D Bilek
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.