Literature DB >> 30828991

A three-step conceptual roadmap for avoiding bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an invited perspective review.

Steven M Strasberg1.   

Abstract

Bile duct injuries are the most common serious complication of cholecystectomy. Avoidance of bile duct injury is a key aim of biliary surgery. The purpose of this paper is to describe laparoscopic cholecystectomy from the viewpoint of three conceptual goals. Three conceptual goals of cholecystectomy are: (1) getting secure anatomical identification of key structures; (2) making the right decision not to perform a total cholecystectomy when conditions are too dangerous to get secure identification - the "inflection point"; and (3) finishing the operation safely when secure anatomical identification of cystic structures is not possible. The Critical View of Safety (CVS) has been shown to be a good way of getting secure anatomical identification. Conceptually, CVS is a method of target identification, the targets being the two cystic structures. Sometimes, anatomic identification is not possible because the risk of biliary injury is judged to be too great. Then a decision is made to abandon the attempt to do a complete cholecystectomy - and instead to "bail-out". This "inflection point" is defined as the moment at which the decision is made to halt the attempt to perform a total cholecystectomy laparoscopically and to finish the operation by a different method. Currently the best bail-out procedure seems to be subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy. Application of conceptual goals of cholecystectomy can help the surgeon to avoid biliary injury.
© 2019 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute cholecystitis; Bile duct injury; Biliary colic; Biliary injury; Cholecystectomy; Critical view of safety; Inflection point; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Subtotal cholecystectomy; Subtotal fenestrating cholecystectomy; Subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30828991     DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci        ISSN: 1868-6974            Impact factor:   7.027


  16 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of reliability and clinical effects of the critical view of safety approach used in laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the pediatric population.

Authors:  Şeref Selçuk Kılıç; Önder Özden; Selcan Türker Çolak
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2021-02-14       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Subtotal Cholecystectomy After Failed Critical View of Safety Is an Effective and Safe Bail Out Strategy.

Authors:  Mariana Chávez-Villa; Ismael Dominguez-Rosado; Rodrigo Figueroa-Méndez; Aldair De Los Santos-Pérez; Miguel Angel Mercado
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Enormous Gallstone Discovered in the Setting of Acute-on-chronic Cholecystitis.

Authors:  Reid C Mahoney; Scott R Marison; Ashley D Marumoto; Daphne E Hemmings
Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf       Date:  2021-11

4.  A retrospective analysis of bile duct injuries treated in a tertiary center: the utility of a universal classification-the ATOM classification.

Authors:  C Popa; D Schlanger; F Zaharie; F Graur; E Moiș; A Ciocan; N Al Hajjar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 5.  Is fundus first laparoscopic cholecystectomy a better option than conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy for difficult cholecystectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ibrahım Umar Garzali; Anas Aburumman; Yousef Alsardia; Belal Alabdallat; Saad Wraikat; Ali Aloun
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-10-07

6.  Laparoscopic surgery and robotic surgery for single-incision cholecystectomy: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Weier Wang; Xiaodong Sun; Fangqiang Wei
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-04-22

7.  The educational quality of the critical view of safety in videos on youtube® versus specialized platforms: which is better? Critical view of safety in virtual resources.

Authors:  Antonio Marmolejo Chavira; Jorge Farell Rivas; Ana Paula Ruiz Funes Molina; Sergio Ayala de la Cruz; Alejandro Cruz Zárate; Alfonso Bandin Musa; Víctor José Cuevas Osorio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Robotic surgery enables safe and comfortable single-incision cholecystectomy: A comparison of robotic and laparoscopic approaches for single-incision surgery.

Authors:  Jaeim Lee; Kee-Hwan Kim; Tae Yoon Lee; Joseph Ahn; Say-June Kim
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

9.  Current Scenario of Postcholecystectomy Bile Leak and Bile Duct Injury at a Tertiary Care Referral Centre of Nepal.

Authors:  Narendra Pandit; Tek Narayan Yadav; Laligen Awale; Kunal Bikram Deo; Yogesh Dhakal; Shailesh Adhikary
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2020-04-21

Review 10.  2020 World Society of Emergency Surgery updated guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute calculus cholecystitis.

Authors:  Michele Pisano; Niccolò Allievi; Kurinchi Gurusamy; Giuseppe Borzellino; Stefania Cimbanassi; Djamila Boerna; Federico Coccolini; Andrea Tufo; Marcello Di Martino; Jeffrey Leung; Massimo Sartelli; Marco Ceresoli; Ronald V Maier; Elia Poiasina; Nicola De Angelis; Stefano Magnone; Paola Fugazzola; Ciro Paolillo; Raul Coimbra; Salomone Di Saverio; Belinda De Simone; Dieter G Weber; Boris E Sakakushev; Alessandro Lucianetti; Andrew W Kirkpatrick; Gustavo P Fraga; Imitaz Wani; Walter L Biffl; Osvaldo Chiara; Fikri Abu-Zidan; Ernest E Moore; Ari Leppäniemi; Yoram Kluger; Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.