Literature DB >> 35948807

A retrospective analysis of bile duct injuries treated in a tertiary center: the utility of a universal classification-the ATOM classification.

C Popa1,2, D Schlanger3,4, F Zaharie1,2, F Graur1,2, E Moiș1,2, A Ciocan1,2, N Al Hajjar1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bile duct injuries (BDI) are the most feared complications that can occur after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). BDI have a high variability and complexity, several classifications being developed along the years in order to correctly assess and divide BDI. The EAES ATOM classification encompasses all the important details of a BDI: A (for anatomy), To (for time of), and M (for mechanism) but have not gained universal acceptance yet. Our study intents to analyze the cases of BDI treated in our institution with a focus on the clinical utility of the ATOM classification.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study, on a 10-year period (2011-2020), including patients diagnosed with BDI after LC, with their definitive treatment performed in our tertiary center. All injuries were retrospectively classified using the Strasberg, Hannover, and ATOM classifications.
RESULTS: We included in our study 100 patients; 15% of the BDI occurred in our center. No classification system was used in 73% of patients; 23% of the BDI were classified by the Strasberg system, 3% were classified by the Bismuth classification, 1% being classified by the ATOM classification. After retrospectively assessing all BDI, we observed that especially the Strasberg classification, as well as Hannover, over-simplifies the characteristics of the injury, many types of BDI according to ATOM being included in the same Strasberg or Hannover category. Most main bile duct injuries underwent a bilio-digestive anastomosis (60%), as a definitive treatment. An important percentage of cases (31%) underwent a primary treatment in the hospital of origin, reintervention with definitive treatment being done in our department.
CONCLUSION: The ATOM classification is the best suited for accurately describing the complexity of a BDI, serving as a template for discussing the correct management for each lesion. Efforts should be made toward increasing the use of this classification in day-to-day clinical practice.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ATOM classification; Bile duct injury; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Year:  2022        PMID: 35948807     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09497-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  18 in total

1.  Does increased experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy yield more complex bile duct injuries?

Authors:  Kelley I Chuang; Douglas Corley; Debbie A Postlethwaite; Maqdooda Merchant; Hobart W Harris
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Demetrius E M Litwin; Mitchell A Cahan
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.741

3.  Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review of bile duct injury prevention.

Authors:  Floyd W van de Graaf; Ina Zaïmi; Laurents P S Stassen; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 4.  An Update on Iatrogenic Biliary Injuries: Identification, Classification, and Management.

Authors:  Joshua T Cohen; Kevin P Charpentier; Rachel E Beard
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 5.  Management of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review.

Authors:  Wan Yee Lau; Eric C H Lai; Stephanie H Y Lau
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.872

Review 6.  Long-Term Impact of Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury.

Authors:  Anne Marthe Schreuder; Olivier R Busch; Marc G Besselink; Povilas Ignatavicius; Antanas Gulbinas; Giedrius Barauskas; Dirk J Gouma; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 2.588

Review 7.  Iatrogenic bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Nael Saad; Michael Darcy
Journal:  Tech Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2008-06

Review 8.  ATOM, the all-inclusive, nominal EAES classification of bile duct injuries during cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Fingerhut; C Dziri; O J Garden; D Gouma; B Millat; E Neugebauer; A Paganini; E Targarona
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Recent classifications of the common bile duct injury.

Authors:  Kwangsik Chun
Journal:  Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2014-08-31

Review 10.  Iatrogenic bile duct injury: impact and management challenges.

Authors:  Antonio Pesce; Stefano Palmucci; Gaetano La Greca; Stefano Puleo
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.