| Literature DB >> 30828780 |
Ewa Sawicka1, Ewa Maria Kratz2, Beata Szymańska1, Anna Guzik1, Artur Wesołowski3, Paweł Kowal4, Lilla Pawlik-Sobecka5, Agnieszka Piwowar1.
Abstract
In recent years, bladder cancer (BC) has been reported as one of the most commonly occurring cancers among older people, and its detection is still difficult. Therefore, there is a need to search for additional useful markers of disease. Some studies indicate the important roles of inflammation and oxidative stress (OS) in bladder tumour pathogenesis. The aim of this study was to examine the levels of selected markers of OS, inflammation and angiogenesis in blood plasma/serum samples derived from patients with BC, and a healthy control group. Moreover the degrees of change and strength of correlation between values of the analysed markers and tumour stage or grade were estimated. Concentrations of: malondialdehyde (MDA) and advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), and total antioxidant status (TAS) divided into slow (TAS-s) and fast (TAS-f) antioxidants (spectrophotometric measurement), angiogenin (ANG) (immunoenzymatic method) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (immunoturbidimetric method) were determined in both the studied groups. The majority of values of the examined parameters were significantly higher among patients, while subfractions of TAS were significantly lower in comparison to the control group. Moreover, different values and different strengths of correlation between the examined parameters and cancer stage or grade were noticed. The most significant changes for CRP were observed in T2 and for MDA in G3, while the lowest TAS-f activity was revealed in G1 patients. Increased values of OS parameters, angiogenesis and inflammation markers, in combination with reduced TAS subfractions activity in BC are important in its pathogenesis and will be helpful in estimation of patients' condition.Entities:
Keywords: Angiogenesis; Bladder cancer; Cancer grade and stage; Inflammation; Oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30828780 PMCID: PMC7242270 DOI: 10.1007/s12253-019-00620-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathol Oncol Res ISSN: 1219-4956 Impact factor: 3.201
Characteristic of bladder cancer patients and control group
| Features | N (%) |
|---|---|
| Patients | 45 |
| Male | 37 (82) |
| Female | 8 (18) |
| Age in years (median) - male | 72 |
| Age in years (median) - female | 69 |
| Clinical stage | |
| Ta | 21 (50.0) |
| T1 | 15 (35.7) |
| T2 | 6 (14.3) |
| Clinical grade | |
| G1 | 16 (35.5) |
| G2 | 23 (51.1) |
| G3 | 6 (13.3) |
| Controls | 20 |
| Male | 9 (45) |
| Female | 11 (55) |
| Age in years (median) - male | 69 |
| Age in years (median) - female | 66 |
Ta = non-invasive papillary tumour; T1 = tumours invading sub epithelial connective tissue; T2 = tumours invading the muscle of bladder wall; G1 = low grade, G2 = moderately grade, G3 = high grade; N = number of cases, % = percentage of cases
The concentration of MDA, AOPP, ANG, CRP, TAS-f and TAS-s activity in bladder cancer patients and control group
| Marker | Patients’ group ( | Control group ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (range) | Mean ± SD | Median (range) | Mean ± SD | ||
| MDA [nmol/mL] | 6.50 (4.10–9.50) | 6.55 ± 1.51 | 5.10 (3.00–7.10) | 5.14 ± 1.24 | 0.0005* |
| AOPP [μmol/L] | 221.90 (65.90–1515.40) | 279.96 ± 246.86 | 102.55 (62.90–249.60) | 119.26 ± 53.24 | 0.0056* |
| TAS-f [μmol TE/L] | 10.80 (1.70–16.70) | 10.76 ± 2.13 | 11.85 (10.20–16.30) | 12.05 ± 1.43 | 0.0167* |
| TAS-s [μmol TE/L] | 15.10 (9.70–18.30) | 14.95 ± 1.51 | 15.95 (13.50–19.00) | 16.15 ± 1.55 | 0.0048* |
| ANG [ng/mL] | 276.20 (102.30–512.40) | 270.90 ± 111.61 | 184.85 (27.30–294.00) | 181.72 ± 54.61 | 0.0012* |
| CRP [mg/mL] | 3.20 (1.10–110.50) | 12.79 ± 27.54 | 3.50 (3.00–1.30) | 4.86 ± 3.23 | 0.2058 |
SD standard deviation; p - value of differences between patients’ and control group; *significant difference between groups; MDA malondialdehyde; AOPP advanced oxidation protein products; ANG angiogenin; CRP C-reactive protein; TAS-f and TAS-s fast and slow antioxidants, respectively; TE Trolox Equivalent; N number of cases
Fig. 1Levels of examined parameters: MDA, AOPP, ANG, CRP, TAS-f and TAS-s in BC subgroups relating to the tumour stage (T), in comparison to the control group
The concentration of MDA, AOPP, ANG, CRP, TAS-f and TAS-s activity in the subgroups of bladder cancer stage (T)
| Marker | Ta | T1 | T2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median (range) | |||
| MDA [nmol/mL] | 6.6 (4.1–9.1) | 6.4 (4.3–9.5) | 6.4 (5.3–8.6) |
| AOPP [μmol/L] | 252.0 (67.9–1515.4) | 258.1 (65.9–500.4) | 151.9 (92.3–258.5) |
| TAS-f [μmol TE/L] | 10.6 (1.7–16.7) | 10.7 (7.9–13.0) | 11.6 (8.3–14.0) |
| TAS-s [μmol TE/L] | 15.0 (11.6–18.3) | 15.2 (9.7–16.6) | 15.2 (13.9–16.4) |
| ANG [ng/mL] | 276.2 (102.9–512.4) | 247.6 (102.3–382.2) | 356.1 (153.6–429.4) |
| CRP [mg/mL] | 3.0 (1.1–13.9) | 3.2 (2.0–110.5) | 44.7 (1.6–100.4) |
Ta, T1, T2 appropriate cancer stage; MDA malondialdehyde; AOPP advanced oxidation protein products; ANG angiogenin; CRP C-reactive protein; TAS-f and TAS-s fast and slow antioxidants, respectively; TE Trolox Equivalent
Fig. 2The values of examined parameters: MDA, AOPP, ANG, CRP, TAS-f and TAS-s in BC subgroups relating to the tumour grade (G) in comparison to the control group
The concentration of MDA, AOPP, ANG, CRP, TAS-f and TAS-s activity in subgroups of bladder cancer grade (G)
| Marker | G1 | G2 | G3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Median (range) | |||
| MDA [nmol/mL] | 6.7 (4.1–9.1) | 6.4 (4.1–9.5) | 7.7 (6.3–8.6) |
| AOPP [μmol/L] | 252.2 (67.9–1515.4) | 258.1 (65.9–500.4) | 154.6 (92.3–720.5) |
| TAS-f [μmol TE/L] | 10.6 (1.7–12.0) | 10.7 (7.9–16.7) | 11.4 (9.6–14.0) |
| TAS-s [μmol TE/L] | 15.1 (11.6–17.7) | 15.0 (9.7–18.3) | 15.3 (13.9–17.7) |
| ANG [ng/mL] | 252.6 (102.9–512.4) | 276.2 (102.3–440.8) | 265.3 (211.2–429.4) |
| CRP [mg/mL] | 3.0 (1.1–20) | 3.2 (0.4–110.5) | 7.4 (2.7–100.1) |
G1,G2,G3 appropriate cancer grade; MDA malondialdehyde; AOPP advanced oxidation protein products; ANG angiogenin; CRP C-reactive protein; TAS-f and TAS-s - fast and slow antioxidants, respectively; TE Trolox Equivalent