| Literature DB >> 30826584 |
Nicholas Furl1, Bruno B Averbeck2, Ryan T McKay3.
Abstract
In realistic and challenging decision contexts, people may show biases that prevent them from choosing their favored options. For example, astronomer Johannes Kepler famously interviewed several candidate fiancées sequentially, but was rejected when attempting to return to a previous candidate. Similarly, we examined human performance on searches for attractive faces through fixed-length sequences by adapting optimal stopping computational theory developed from behavioral ecology and economics. Although economics studies have repeatedly found that participants sample too few options before choosing the best-ranked number from a series, we instead found overlong searches with many sequences ending without choice. Participants employed irrationally high choice thresholds, compared to the more lax, realistic standards of a Bayesian ideal observer, which achieved better-ranked faces. We consider several computational accounts and find that participants most resemble a Bayesian model that decides based on altered attractiveness values. These values may produce starkly different biases in the facial attractiveness domain than in other decision domains.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian modeling; Decision making; Facial attractiveness; Mate choice; Optimal stopping
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30826584 PMCID: PMC6993934 DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.02.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cogn Psychol ISSN: 0010-0285 Impact factor: 3.468