Literature DB >> 24501043

Predicting romantic interest and decisions in the very early stages of mate selection: standards, accuracy, and sex differences.

Garth J O Fletcher1, Patrick S G Kerr, Norman P Li, Katherine A Valentine.   

Abstract

In the current study, opposite-sex strangers had 10-min conversations with a possible further date in mind. Based on judgments from partners and observers, three main findings were produced. First, judgments of attractiveness/vitality perceptions (compared with warmth/trustworthiness and status/resources) were the most accurate and were predominant in influencing romantic interest and decisions about further contact. Second, women were more cautious and choosy than men-women underestimated their partner's romantic interest, whereas men exaggerated it, and women were less likely to want further contact. Third, a mediational model found that women (compared with men) were less likely to want further contact because they perceived their partners as possessing less attractiveness/vitality and as falling shorter of their minimum standards of attractiveness/vitality, thus generating lower romantic interest. These novel results are discussed in terms of the mixed findings from prior research, evolutionary psychology, and the functionality of lay psychology in early mate-selection contexts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; mate selection; sex differences; standards

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24501043     DOI: 10.1177/0146167213519481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  11 in total

1.  Predicting Romantic Interest at Zero Acquaintance: Evidence of Sex Differences in Trait Perception but Not in Predictors of Interest.

Authors:  Sally G Olderbak; Frederic Malter; Pedro Sofio Abril Wolf; Daniel N Jones; Aurelio José Figueredo
Journal:  Eur J Pers       Date:  2017-01-06

2.  Expectations for future relationship satisfaction: Unique sources and critical implications for commitment.

Authors:  Levi R Baker; James K McNulty; Laura E VanderDrift
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2017-04-03

3.  Looking for Mr(s) Right: Decision bias can prevent us from finding the most attractive face.

Authors:  Nicholas Furl; Bruno B Averbeck; Ryan T McKay
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Ideal Standards, Acceptance, and Relationship Satisfaction: Latitudes of Differential Effects.

Authors:  Asuman Buyukcan-Tetik; Lorne Campbell; Catrin Finkenauer; Johan C Karremans; Gesa Kappen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-09-28

5.  Men With a Terminal Illness Relax Their Criteria for Facial Attractiveness.

Authors:  Dariusz P Danel; Agnieszka E Siennicka; Pawel Fedurek; Tomasz Frackowiak; Piotr Sorokowski; Ewa A Jankowska; Boguslaw Pawlowski
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2017-02-13

6.  Presenting Your Best Self(ie): The Influence of Gender on Vertical Orientation of Selfies on Tinder.

Authors:  Jennifer R Sedgewick; Meghan E Flath; Lorin J Elias
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-21

7.  Body sway predicts romantic interest in speed dating.

Authors:  Andrew Chang; Haley E Kragness; Wei Tsou; Dan J Bosnyak; Anja Thiede; Laurel J Trainor
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  The importance of first impression judgements in interspecies interactions.

Authors:  Laura Clark; Kevin Butler; Kay L Ritchie; Laëtitia Maréchal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The Role of Emotion Projection, Sexual Desire, and Self-Rated Attractiveness in the Sexual Overperception Bias.

Authors:  Iliana Samara; Tom S Roth; Mariska E Kret
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-08-13

10.  We're Not That Choosy: Emerging Evidence of a Progression Bias in Romantic Relationships.

Authors:  Samantha Joel; Geoff MacDonald
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2021-07-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.