Literature DB >> 21702820

A hierarchical bayesian model of human decision-making on an optimal stopping problem.

Michael D Lee1.   

Abstract

We consider human performance on an optimal stopping problem where people are presented with a list of numbers independently chosen from a uniform distribution. People are told how many numbers are in the list, and how they were chosen. People are then shown the numbers one at a time, and are instructed to choose the maximum, subject to the constraint that they must choose a number at the time it is presented, and any choice below the maximum is incorrect. We present empirical evidence that suggests people use threshold-based models to make decisions, choosing the first currently maximal number that exceeds a fixed threshold for that position in the list. We then develop a hierarchical generative account of this model family, and use Bayesian methods to learn about the parameters of the generative process, making inferences about the threshold decision models people use. We discuss the interesting aspects of human performance on the task, including the lack of learning, and the presence of large individual differences, and consider the possibility of extending the modeling framework to account for individual differences. We also use the modeling results to discuss the merits of hierarchical, generative and Bayesian models of cognitive processes more generally. 2006 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 21702820     DOI: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  8 in total

Review 1.  Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models.

Authors:  Michael D Lee
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

2.  A hierarchical adaptive approach to optimal experimental design.

Authors:  Woojae Kim; Mark A Pitt; Zhong-Lin Lu; Mark Steyvers; Jay I Myung
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  Looking for Mr(s) Right: Decision bias can prevent us from finding the most attractive face.

Authors:  Nicholas Furl; Bruno B Averbeck; Ryan T McKay
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Subjective optimality in finite sequential decision-making.

Authors:  Yeonju Sin; HeeYoung Seon; Yun Kyoung Shin; Oh-Sang Kwon; Dongil Chung
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Structure learning in human sequential decision-making.

Authors:  Daniel E Acuña; Paul Schrater
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  A hierarchical Bayesian approach to adaptive vision testing: A case study with the contrast sensitivity function.

Authors:  Hairong Gu; Woojae Kim; Fang Hou; Luis Andres Lesmes; Mark A Pitt; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jay I Myung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of contrast sensitivity functions in a within-subject design.

Authors:  Yukai Zhao; Luis Andres Lesmes; Fang Hou; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Computational-Model-Based Analysis of Context Effects on Harmonic Expectancy.

Authors:  Satoshi Morimoto; Gerard B Remijn; Yoshitaka Nakajima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.