Literature DB >> 30826165

Bispecific Forkhead Transcription Factor FoxN3 Recognizes Two Distinct Motifs with Different DNA Shapes.

Julia M Rogers1, Colin T Waters2, Tom C M Seegar3, Sanchez M Jarrett4, Amelia N Hallworth5, Stephen C Blacklow6, Martha L Bulyk7.   

Abstract

Transcription factors (TFs) control gene expression by binding DNA recognition sites in genomic regulatory regions. Although most forkhead TFs recognize a canonical forkhead (FKH) motif, RYAAAYA, some forkheads recognize a completely different (FHL) motif, GACGC. Bispecific forkhead proteins recognize both motifs, but the molecular basis for bispecific DNA recognition is not understood. We present co-crystal structures of the FoxN3 DNA binding domain bound to the FKH and FHL sites, respectively. FoxN3 adopts a similar conformation to recognize both motifs, making contacts with different DNA bases using the same amino acids. However, the DNA structure is different in the two complexes. These structures reveal how a single TF binds two unrelated DNA sequences and the importance of DNA shape in the mechanism of bispecific recognition.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA binding sites; DNA shape; co-crystal structures; forkhead; gene regulation; protein-DNA interactions; specificity; transcription factors

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30826165      PMCID: PMC6474805          DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   17.970


  49 in total

Review 1.  Recognition of specific DNA sequences.

Authors:  C W Garvie; C Wolberger
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  A structural taxonomy of DNA-binding domains.

Authors:  S C Harrison
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-10-24       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Crystal structure of trp repressor/operator complex at atomic resolution.

Authors:  Z Otwinowski; R W Schevitz; R G Zhang; C L Lawson; A Joachimiak; R Q Marmorstein; B F Luisi; P B Sigler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-09-22       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Structure of the human FOXO4-DBD-DNA complex at 1.9 Å resolution reveals new details of FOXO binding to the DNA.

Authors:  Evzen Boura; Lenka Rezabkova; Jiri Brynda; Veronika Obsilova; Tomas Obsil
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-11-16

5.  Identifying ChIP-seq enrichment using MACS.

Authors:  Jianxing Feng; Tao Liu; Bo Qin; Yong Zhang; Xiaole Shirley Liu
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Identification of differentially expressed genes in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC): overexpression of NPM, CDK1 and NDRG1 and underexpression of CHES1.

Authors:  Joseph T Chang; Hung-Ming Wang; Ku-Wei Chang; Wen-Ho Chen; Ming-Chun Wen; Yuan-Ming Hsu; Benjamin Yat-Ming Yung; I-How Chen; Chun-Ta Liao; Ling-Ling Hsieh; Ann-Joy Cheng
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution.

Authors:  Paul D Adams; Pavel V Afonine; Gábor Bunkóczi; Vincent B Chen; Ian W Davis; Nathaniel Echols; Jeffrey J Headd; Li-Wei Hung; Gary J Kapral; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Airlie J McCoy; Nigel W Moriarty; Robert Oeffner; Randy J Read; David C Richardson; Jane S Richardson; Thomas C Terwilliger; Peter H Zwart
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-01-22

8.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Cole Trapnell; Mihai Pop; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Loss of Sin3/Rpd3 histone deacetylase restores the DNA damage response in checkpoint-deficient strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kenneth L Scott; Sharon E Plon
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS).

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Tao Liu; Clifford A Meyer; Jérôme Eeckhoute; David S Johnson; Bradley E Bernstein; Chad Nusbaum; Richard M Myers; Myles Brown; Wei Li; X Shirley Liu
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  10 in total

1.  Regulation of retinal amacrine cell generation by miR-216b and Foxn3.

Authors:  Huanqing Zhang; Pei Zhuang; Ryan M Welchko; Manhong Dai; Fan Meng; David L Turner
Journal:  Development       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 6.868

2.  FOXN3 and GDNF Polymorphisms as Common Genetic Factors of Substance Use and Addictive Behaviors.

Authors:  Andrea Vereczkei; Csaba Barta; Anna Magi; Judit Farkas; Andrea Eisinger; Orsolya Király; Andrea Belik; Mark D Griffiths; Anna Szekely; Mária Sasvári-Székely; Róbert Urbán; Marc N Potenza; Rajendra D Badgaiyan; Kenneth Blum; Zsolt Demetrovics; Eszter Kotyuk
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-04-26

3.  Novel insights from a multiomics dissection of the Hayflick limit.

Authors:  Han Yuan; Ilya Soifer; Michelle Chan; Tobias M Maile; Rebecca Y Wang; Andrea Ireland; Jonathon J O'Brien; Jérôme Goudeau; Leanne J G Chan; Twaritha Vijay; Adam Freund; Cynthia Kenyon; Bryson D Bennett; Fiona E McAllister; David R Kelley; Margaret Roy; Robert L Cohen; Arthur D Levinson; David Botstein; David G Hendrickson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  FOXN3 controls liver glucose metabolism by regulating gluconeogenic substrate selection.

Authors:  Santhosh Karanth; Bhagirath Chaurasia; Faith M Bowman; Trevor S Tippetts; William L Holland; Scott A Summers; Amnon Schlegel
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2019-09

5.  The crystal structure of human forkhead box N1 in complex with DNA reveals the structural basis for forkhead box family specificity.

Authors:  Joseph A Newman; Hazel Aitkenhead; Angeline E Gavard; Ioanna A Rota; Adam E Handel; Georg A Hollander; Opher Gileadi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Mechanistic insights into transcription factor cooperativity and its impact on protein-phenotype interactions.

Authors:  Ignacio L Ibarra; Nele M Hollmann; Bernd Klaus; Sandra Augsten; Britta Velten; Janosch Hennig; Judith B Zaugg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Systematic identification of non-canonical transcription factor motifs.

Authors:  Luis Chumpitaz-Diaz; Md Abul Hassan Samee; Katherine S Pollard
Journal:  BMC Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2021-08-31

Review 8.  Toward a mechanistic understanding of DNA binding by forkhead transcription factors and its perturbation by pathogenic mutations.

Authors:  Shuyan Dai; Linzhi Qu; Jun Li; Yongheng Chen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Motif models proposing independent and interdependent impacts of nucleotides are related to high and low affinity transcription factor binding sites in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Anton V Tsukanov; Victoria V Mironova; Victor G Levitsky
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  FOXL2 and FOXA1 cooperatively assemble on the TP53 promoter in alternative dimer configurations.

Authors:  Yuri Choi; Yongyang Luo; Seunghwa Lee; Hanyong Jin; Hye-Jin Yoon; Yoonsoo Hahn; Jeehyeon Bae; Hyung Ho Lee
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 19.160

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.