Literature DB >> 3082452

Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies.

M J Gardner, D Machin, M J Campbell.   

Abstract

Two check lists are used routinely in the statistical assessment of manuscripts submitted to the "BMJ." One is for papers of a general nature and the other specifically for reports on clinical trials. Each check list includes questions on the design, conduct, analysis, and presentation of studies, and answers to these contribute to the overall statistical evaluation. Only a small proportion of submitted papers are assessed statistically, and these are selected at the refereeing or editorial stage. Examination of the use of the check lists showed that most papers contained statistical failings, many of which could easily be remedied. It is recommended that the check lists should be used by statistical referees, editorial staff, and authors and also during the design stage of studies.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3082452      PMCID: PMC1339731          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.292.6523.810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)        ISSN: 0267-0623


  16 in total

1.  Conference Report: Steaming up windows and refereeing medical papers.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-10-30

2.  Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.

Authors:  M J Gardner; D G Altman
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-15

3.  Towards estimation and confidence intervals.

Authors:  M J Langman
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-15

4.  Assessing reports of therapeutic trials.

Authors:  N D Lionel; A Herxheimer
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1970-09-12

5.  Exaggerated responsiveness to thyrotrophin releasing hormone: a risk factor in women with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J W Dean; P B Fowler
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-05-25

6.  Is the clinical trial evidence about new drugs statistically adequate?

Authors:  J M Bland; D R Jones; S Bennett; D G Cook; A P Haines; A J MacFarlane
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals.

Authors:  D G Altman; S M Gore; M J Gardner; S J Pocock
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-05-07

8.  Is the statistical assessment of papers submitted to the "British Medical Journal" effective?

Authors:  M J Gardner; D G Altman; D R Jones; D Machin
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-05-07

9.  Severe anaphylaxis and drug-induced beta-blockade.

Authors:  P J Hannaway; G D Hopper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-06-23       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Statistics and ethics in medical research: III How large a sample?

Authors:  D G Altman
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-11-15
View more
  31 in total

1.  Methodological and statistical techniques: what do residents really need to know about statistics?

Authors:  James F Reed; Philip Salen; Pooneh Bagher
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Journalology--or what editors do.

Authors:  J Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-10-03

3.  Critical appraisal of published research: introductory guidelines.

Authors:  F G Fowkes; P M Fulton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-05-11

4.  The quality of health services research in medical practice in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  F G Fowkes; W M Garraway; C K Sheehy
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  A Strategy to Identify Critical Appraisal Criteria for Primary Mixed-Method Studies.

Authors:  Joanna E M Sale; Kevin Brazil
Journal:  Qual Quant       Date:  2004-08

Review 6.  Clinical trials and clinical practice in the elderly. A focus on hypertension.

Authors:  M E Kitler
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.923

7.  Statistics in biomedical manuscripts: what editors want from authors and peer reviewers.

Authors:  B P Squires
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-02-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Critical appraisal of scientific articles: part 1 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.

Authors:  Jean-Baptist du Prel; Bernd Röhrig; Maria Blettner
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.

Authors:  S H Downs; N Black
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Clinical trials in urogynecology.

Authors:  D Moher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1997
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.