Literature DB >> 4919020

Assessing reports of therapeutic trials.

N D Lionel, A Herxheimer.   

Abstract

A check list is described which helps the systematic assessment of reports of therapeutic trials, particularly the aspects that need to be considered in assessing their validity. The check list was used to examine 141 reports of therapeutic trials published in four British non-specialist journals in the first six months of 1966 and of 1969. Of these reports 51% were found to be acceptable and a further 16% probably acceptable; 33% were considered unacceptable because they lacked one or more of the features required in a valid report. The check list has been found useful in assessing claims made for drugs and other therapeutic measures on the basis of published reports.

Mesh:

Year:  1970        PMID: 4919020      PMCID: PMC1701692          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.3.5723.637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Med J        ISSN: 0007-1447


  5 in total

1.  A METHOD FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF REPORTS OF DRUG TRIALS.

Authors:  W A MAHON; E E DANIEL
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1964-02-29       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Patient co-operation and the sensitivity of clinical trials.

Authors:  C R JOYCE
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1962-11

3.  Controls in clinical studies.

Authors:  H R PATTERSON
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1962-01-13       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Current standards in reported drug trials.

Authors:  R J Reiffenstein; A J Schiltroth; D M Todd
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1968-12-14       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Drug defaulting in a general practice.

Authors:  A M Porter
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1969-01-25
  5 in total
  19 in total

1.  Clinical trial experience by simulation: a workshop report.

Authors:  B W Madsen; T L Woodings; K F Ilett; G M Shenfield; J M Potter; J W Paterson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-11-11

2.  Frontiers in inflammatory bowel disease. The proceedings of a conference sponsored by the McReynolds Foundation. Part II.

Authors:  R G Shorter; D A Shephard
Journal:  Am J Dig Dis       Date:  1975-07

3.  The quality of health services research in medical practice in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  F G Fowkes; W M Garraway; C K Sheehy
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 4.  Clinical trials and clinical practice in the elderly. A focus on hypertension.

Authors:  M E Kitler
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Evaluating the quality of longitudinal statistical applications in original publications on Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Chengjie Xiong; Yuxiao Tang; Gerald van Belle; J Philip Miller; Lenore J Launer; John C Morris
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.

Authors:  S H Downs; N Black
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies.

Authors:  M J Gardner; D Machin; M J Campbell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-22

8.  Data-reduction problems in biopharmaceutics and pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  J Zuidema; H J Wynne
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1989-06-23

9.  Observations on the statistical analysis aspect of clinical trials.

Authors:  F O Adedji
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Double-blind trial of propranolol and practolol in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  P J Hubner; G M Ziady; G K Lane; T Hardarson; B Scales; C M Oakley; J F Goodwin
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1973-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.