| Literature DB >> 30823919 |
Toshiki Nojiri1, Chia-Yu Chen1, David M Kim1, John Da Silva2, Cliff Lee1, Masahiko Maeno3, Arthur A McClelland4, Bryan Tse1, Shigemi Ishikawa-Nagai1, Wataru Hatakeyama1, Hisatomo Kondo5, Masazumi Nagai6.
Abstract
Natural teeth are supported by connective tissue collagen fibers that insert perpendicularly in the tooth cementum. Perpendicular insertion plays an important role in the maintenance of the junction between the oral epithelium and the periodontal connective tissue. Most titanium dental implant surfaces have no micro or macro structure to support perpendicularly oriented collagen attachment. Without this tight biologic seal to resist bacterial invasion and epithelial downgrowth, progressiveEntities:
Keywords: Collagen; Implant surface; Nanotubes; Perpendicular orientation; Titanium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30823919 PMCID: PMC6396481 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-019-0467-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 10.435
Fig. 1This scheme illustrates the electrochemical anodization process used to fabricate the TNT on titanium specimens. a The titanium pieces were used as anodes and the cupper pieces as cathode in a fluoride-based electrolyte solution. b After anodization, TNT was obtained. c TNT was removed with ultrasonication to unveil a glossy surface underneath with a uniform array of shallow TNT
Fig. 2This scheme illustrates EPF and perpendicular CoI inserted into the TNT. a EPF: CoI was transferred onto TNT in a semi dry transfer. The transfer unit was assembled from the bottom in the following order: (1) anode of a semi dry blotter; (2) 1× TGB-wetted filter paper; (3) TNT surface upward; (4) 6% Bis Tris gel; (5) TGB-wetted filter to which CoI was spotted at the titanium facing area; (6) cathode. b Scheme of perpendicular CoI inserted into the TNT
Fig. 3SEM images of titanium surface through anodization. a 1 V × 1 h, b 1 V × 3 h, c 1 V × 5 h, d 5 V × 1 h, e 5 V × 3 h, f 5 V × 5 h, g 10 V × 1 h, h 10 V × 3 h, i 10 V × 5 h, j 20 V × 1 h, k 20 V × 3 h, l 20 V × 5 h, m 30 V × 1 h, n 30 V × 3 h, o 30 V × 5 h, p 50 V × 1 h, q 50 V × 3 h, r 50 V × 5 h, s TiO2/control. Original magnification ×100,000
Measurement of nanotube number and diameter
| Voltage (V) | 0 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 50 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anodization (h) | ||||||||
| # of NTs observed | 1 h | NF | NF | NF | NF | IF | IF | 457.8 ± 30.5 |
| 3 h | NF | NF | NF | NF | IF | 601.3 ± 13.2 | 331.6 ± 32.9 | |
| 5 h | NF | NF | NF | NF | IF | 350.9 ± 26.0 | 311.1 ± 29.8 | |
| Diameter (nm) | 1 h | NF | NF | NF | NF | 47.0 ± 3.7 | 66.4 ± 8.5 | 113.6 ± 8.6 |
| 3 h | NF | NF | NF | NF | 38.4 ± 3.0 | 67.0 ± 2.6 | 115 ± 5.3 | |
| 5 h | NF | NF | NF | NF | 43.6 ± 3.0 | 68.3 ± 3.6 | 147.6 ± 11.7 | |
# of TNT observed: View of magnification 100,000×
NF not formed, IF irregular formation
Fig. 4SEM images of CoI attached on the titanium surface. a TiO2–CoIEPF, b TNT–CoIEPF, c TiO2–CoICL, and d TNT–CoICL, a, b original magnification ×500,000. c, d original magnification ×100,000
Fig. 5Surface topographic image through AFM for a1 TiO2, a2 3D image of TiO2, b1 TiO2–CoIEPF, b2 3D image of TiO2–CoIEPF, c1 TiO2–CoICL, c2 3D image of TiO2 –CoICL, d1 TNT, d2 3D image of TNT, e1 TNT–CoIEPF, e2 3D image of TNT–CoIEPF, f1 TNT–CoICL, f2 3D image of TNT–CoICL
Fig. 6FITR-ATR spectra of CoI attached titanium surfaces with and without the ultrasonication. a Pre ultrasonication of CL group. b Pre ultrasonication of EPF group. c 3 cycles ultrasonication of CL group. d 3 cycles ultrasonication of EPF group. e 10 cycles ultrasonication of CL group. f 10 cycles ultrasonication of EPF group
Fig. 7Average absorbance of the Amide bond and Ti–OH bond in FTIR-ATR spectra. a Average absorbance at 1550–1700 cm−1 corresponding amido bond. b Average absorbance at 1000–1120 cm−1 corresponding Ti–OH bond. Error bars represent mean ± SD for n = 3, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
Fig. 8SEM images of epithelial cells attached on the surface of each group in cell attachment assay. a1, 2 TiO2, b1, 2 TNT, c1, 2 TiO2–CoICL, d1, 2 TNT–CoICL, e1, 2 TNT–CoIEPF. a1–e1: original magnification ×300. a2–e2: Original magnification ×1500
Fig. 9The comparison of relative cell amount on each group surface. Relative amount of epithelial cell on each group surface. Error bars means represent mean ± SD for n = 3, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01