Literature DB >> 22299086

A systematic review of biologic and technical complications with fixed implant rehabilitations for edentulous patients.

Panos Papaspyridakos1, Chun-Jung Chen, Sung-Kiang Chuang, Hans-Peter Weber, German O Gallucci.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the incidence and types of biologic and technical complications associated with implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses (IFCDPs) for edentulous patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic MEDLINE/PubMED search was conducted to identify randomized controlled clinical trials and prospective cohort studies with IFCDPs for edentulous patients. Reports with at least 5 years of follow-up after prosthesis insertion were selected. Pooled data were analyzed statistically, and the cumulative complication rates were calculated by meta-analysis and regression.
RESULTS: Of a total of 281 one-piece IFCDPs (mean exposure time of 9.5 years) and 653 complication events, the complication rate was estimated at 24.6% per 100 restoration-years. The cumulative rates of "prosthesis free of complications" after 5 and 10 years were 29.3% and 8.6%, respectively. The most common implantrelated biologic complication was peri-implant bone loss (> 2 mm), at rates of 20.1% after 5 years and 40.3% after 10 years. The most frequent implant-related technical complication was screw fracture, yielding a 5-year complication rate of 10.4% and a 10-year rate of 20.8%. The most frequent prosthesis-related biologic complication was hypertrophy or hyperplasia of tissue around the IFCDPs (13.0% and 26.0% after 5 and 10 years, respectively). The most common prosthesis-related technical complication reported with IFCDPs was chipping or fracture of the veneering material (33.3% at 5 years and 66.6% at 10 years).
CONCLUSION: Biologic and technical complications after the placement of IFCDPs occur continuously over time as a result of fatigue and stress. These events may not lead to implant/prosthetic failures, but they are significant in relation to the amount of repair and maintenance needed, time, and cost to both the clinician and patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22299086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  27 in total

1.  Evaluation of implant screw loosening by resonance frequency analysis with triaxial piezoelectric pick-up: in vitro model and in vivo animal study.

Authors:  Makiko Miyashita; Toru Ogawa; Hideki Naito; Aya Shibamoto; Angelina Shuhua Wang; Kenta Shobara; Keiichi Sasaki
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Assessment of IL-10, IL-1ß and TNF-α gene polymorphisms in patients with peri-implantitis and healthy controls.

Authors:  Leila Saremi; Marziyeh Shafizadeh; Emran Esmaeilzadeh; Mohammad Ebrahim Ghaffari; Mohammad Hosein Mahdavi; Reza Amid; Mahdi Kadkhodazadeh
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 3.  The use of three implants to support a fixed prosthesis in the management of the edentulous mandible: a systematic review.

Authors:  Murtaza Hirani; Maria Devine; Olamide Obisesan; Cathy Bryant
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-06-17

4.  Impact of Polymerization Technique and ZrO2 Nanoparticle Addition on the Fracture Load of Interim Implant-Supported Fixed Cantilevered Prostheses in Comparison to CAD/CAM Material.

Authors:  Faris A Alshahrani; Shorouq Khalid Hamid; Lujain Ali Alghamdi; Firas K Alqarawi; Yousif A Al-Dulaijan; Hamad S AlRumaih; Haidar Alalawi; Maram A Al Ghamdi; Fawaz Alzoubi; Mohammed M Gad
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08

5.  Reliability and failure modes of narrow implant systems.

Authors:  Ronaldo Hirata; Estevam A Bonfante; Rodolfo B Anchieta; Lucas S Machado; Gileade Freitas; Vinicius P Fardin; Nick Tovar; Paulo G Coelho
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Effect of loading frequency on cyclic fatigue lifetime of a standard-diameter implant with an internal abutment connection.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Duan; Jason A Griggs
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral digital impression system and conventional impression techniques for multiple implants in the full-arch edentulous mandible.

Authors:  Firas-Abdulameer Farhan; Ali-Jameel-Abdul Sahib; Abdalbseet-Ahmad Fatalla
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-05-01

8.  Single-visit chairside adjustment of a metal-acrylic resin implant-supported fixed complete dental prosthesis on an unloaded implant using a novel fixed attachment system: a case report.

Authors:  Pedro Molinero-Mourelle; Nadin Al-Haj Husain; Samir Abou-Ayash; Burak Yilmaz; Tateyuki Iizuka; Martin Schimmel
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-15

9.  Experimental study on the factors affecting torque of beam-type implant torque wrenches.

Authors:  Hiroki Shiba; Yuji Sato; Junichi Furuya; Tokiko Osawa; Akio Isobe; Myu Hayashi; Noboru Kitagawa
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 10.  Prosthodontic Principles in Dental Implantology: Adjustments in a Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic-Battered Economy.

Authors:  Ricardo A Boyce
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2020-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.