Literature DB >> 30819439

Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: Pathologic features, treatment options, clinical outcome and prognostic variables.

Angiolo Gadducci1, Maria Elena Guerrieri2, Stefania Cosio2.   

Abstract

Adenocarcinoma accounts for 10-25% of all cervical cancers, and its relative and absolute rate has raised over the past decades. Most, but not all the authors, reported that adenocarcinoma has a greater propensity to lymph node, ovarian and distant metastases and a worse prognosis compared with squamous cell carcinoma. However, whether histologic type is an independent prognostic factor is still a debated issue. Moreover, adenocarcinoma is a very heterogenous disease, including different histological subtypes. Whereas radical hysterectomy and definitive radiotherapy achieve the same clinical outcome in early stage squamous cell carcinoma, surgery seems to obtain better survival compared with definitive radiotherapy in early stage adenocarcinoma. Chemoradiation is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer regardless of histologic type, although several retrospective studies showed that patients with adenocarcinoma were more likely to die than those with squamous cell carcinoma both before and after concurrent chemoradiation era. The prognostic relevance of biological variables, such as cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, p53, cyclooxygenase-2 [COX-2], cell surface tyrosine-kinases and programmed death-ligand [PD-L1], is still under investigation. Palliative chemotherapy is the only treatment option for persistent or recurrent cervical adenocarcinoma not amenable with surgery and radiotherapy. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors as well as a therapeutic strategy targeting cell surface tyrosine kinases should be adequately explored in this clinical setting.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenocarcinoma of the cervix; Chemoradioation; Chemotherapy; Radiotherapy; Squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix; Surgery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30819439     DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol        ISSN: 1040-8428            Impact factor:   6.312


  21 in total

1.  The value of HPV genotypes combined with clinical indicators in the classification of cervical squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Zhimin He; Rongsheng Chen; Shangying Hu; Yajiao Zhang; Yang Liu; Chengwei Li; Fajin Lv; Zhibo Xiao
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Is there different prognosis between cervical endometrioid adenocarcinoma and ordinary cervical adenocarcinoma in a propensity score matching study based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database?

Authors:  Fubin Zhang; Bohong Jin; Hui Yan; Tianhong Zhu; Huiqing Ding; Xueqin Chen; Yutao Guan
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 0.496

Review 3.  [Revised German guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix-what's new for pathologists in 2021?]

Authors:  Lars-Christian Horn; Matthias W Beckmann; Markus Follmann; Martin C Koch; Monika Nothacker; Birgit Pöschel; Frederik Stübs; Dietmar Schmidt; Anne Kathrin Höhn
Journal:  Pathologie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-02-21

4.  Testing Algorithms for the Diagnosis of Malignant Glandular Tumors of the Uterine Cervix Histotyped per the International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification (IECC) System.

Authors:  Máire A Duggan; Qiuli Duan; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Mary Anne Brett; Sandra Lee; Mustapha Abubakar; Martin Köbel; Monica Rodriguez; Aylin Sar
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2022-02-01

5.  Post-radiotherapy hysterectomy does not benefit females with cervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Elen Cristiane Augusto Souza; Daniel Zaidan Santos; Jose Carlos Campos Torres; Diama Bhadra Vale; Joana Froes Bragança; Julio Cesar Teixeira
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-10-26

6.  Combined Evaluation of Preoperative Serum CEA and CA125 as an Independent Prognostic Biomarker in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Genping Huang; Ruizhe Chen; Nanjia Lu; Qin Chen; Weiguo Lv; Baohua Li
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Treatment outcomes of patients with adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix after definitive radiotherapy and the prognostic impact of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes in pre-treatment biopsy specimens: a multi-institutional retrospective study.

Authors:  Yuhei Miyasaka; Yuya Yoshimoto; Kazutoshi Murata; Shin-Ei Noda; Ken Ando; Takeshi Ebara; Noriyuki Okonogi; Takuya Kaminuma; Seiji Yamada; Hayato Ikota; Hideaki Yokoo; Tatsuya Ohno; Takashi Nakano
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.724

8.  Positive staining of the immunoligand B7-H6 in abnormal/transformed keratinocytes consistently accompanies the progression of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Gloria Yareli Gutierrez-Silerio; Ramon Antonio Franco-Topete; Jesse Haramati; Eduardo Miguel Navarrete-Medina; Jorge Gutierrez-Franco; Miriam Ruth Bueno-Topete; Blanca Estela Bastidas-Ramirez; Martha Eloisa Ramos-Marquez; Susana Del Toro-Arreola
Journal:  BMC Immunol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.615

Review 9.  Synchronous Cervical Adenocarcinoma and Ovarian Serous Adenocarcinoma-A Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  Nicolae Bacalbasa; Irina Cecilia Balescu; Camelia Diaconu; Simona Dima; Laura Iliescu; Mihaela Vilcu; Alexandru Filipescu; Ioana Halmaciu; Dragos Cretoiu; Iulian Brezean
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-03-29       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  Significance of concurrent use of weekly cisplatin in carbon-ion radiotherapy for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Noriyuki Okonogi; Masaru Wakatsuki; Shingo Kato; Hiroto Murata; Hiroki Kiyohara; Kumiko Karasawa; Tatsuya Ohno; Hiroshi Tsuji; Takashi Nakano; Makio Shozu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.