Literature DB >> 34799503

Testing Algorithms for the Diagnosis of Malignant Glandular Tumors of the Uterine Cervix Histotyped per the International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification (IECC) System.

Máire A Duggan1, Qiuli Duan2, Ruth M Pfeiffer3, Mary Anne Brett4, Sandra Lee1, Mustapha Abubakar3, Martin Köbel1, Monica Rodriguez1, Aylin Sar5.   

Abstract

The International Endocervical adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification (IECC) categorizes tumors into human papilloma virus (HPV) associated (HPVA), not associated (NHPV), and invasive adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (IA NOS). HPVA and NHPV encompass 11 histotypes and an algorithm of mucin content, HPV ribonucleic acid (RNA), estrogen receptor and GATA3 is proposed for the diagnosis of most. In this study, the IECC algorithm's diagnoses were compared with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) based IECC histotyping. Kappa statistics measured performance agreement. With additional markers, hierarchical clustering by random forest (RF) classification identified the most discriminating between tumor types, and investigated other algorithms. Three pathologists independently reviewed digitized H&E images of n=152 primary cervical adenocarcinomas for IECC histotype and mucin content, and tissue microarrays for expression of HPV RNA by in situ hybridization and 16 antibodies by immunohistochemistry. Results were finalized by consensus. There were n=113 HPVA, n=22 NHPV, and n=17 IA NOS. Mucin was obvious in n=36 and limited in n=116. Among n=124 with satisfactory test results, HPV RNA was positive in n=96, estrogen receptor in n=72, and GATA3 in n=15. The IECC algorithm diagnosed n=99 which agreed with H&E histotyping in n=64 for a fair κ of 0.36 (95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.50): n=12 were undiagnosed and n=13 were IA NOS. Small sample sizes restricted RF to HPVA versus NHPV which were discriminated by p16, HPV RNA, and MUC6 with an area under the curve of 0.74 (95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.90). The IECC algorithm for histotyping under-performed. The RF algorithmin for categorization was favorable, but validation in larger studies and investigation of additional algorithms to discriminate between all IECC histotypes are needed.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34799503      PMCID: PMC8857037          DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol        ISSN: 1533-4058


  14 in total

1.  High-risk human papillomavirus E6/E7 mRNA detection by a novel in situ hybridization assay strongly correlates with p16 expression and patient outcomes in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Odey C Ukpo; John J Flanagan; Xiao-Jun Ma; Yuling Luo; Wade L Thorstad; James S Lewis
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Diagnostic Algorithmic Proposal Based on Comprehensive Immunohistochemical Evaluation of 297 Invasive Endocervical Adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Simona Stolnicu; Iulia Barsan; Lien Hoang; Prusha Patel; Luis Chiriboga; Cristina Terinte; Anna Pesci; Sarit Aviel-Ronen; Takako Kiyokawa; Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero; Malcolm C Pike; Esther Oliva; Kay J Park; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Observer agreement comparing the use of virtual slides with glass slides in the pathology review component of the POSH breast cancer cohort study.

Authors:  Emily Clare Shaw; Andrew M Hanby; Kevin Wheeler; Abeer M Shaaban; David Poller; Sheila Barton; Darren Treanor; Laura Fulford; Rosemary A Walker; Deirdre Ryan; Sunil R Lakhani; Clive A Wells; Heather Roche; Jeffrey M Theaker; Ian O Ellis; J Louise Jones; Diana M Eccles
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification (IECC): A New Pathogenetic Classification for Invasive Adenocarcinomas of the Endocervix.

Authors:  Simona Stolnicu; Iulia Barsan; Lien Hoang; Prusha Patel; Cristina Terinte; Anna Pesci; Sarit Aviel-Ronen; Takako Kiyokawa; Isabel Alvarado-Cabrero; Malcolm C Pike; Esther Oliva; Kay J Park; Robert A Soslow
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Cervical Adenocarcinoma: A Comparison of the Reproducibility of the World Health Organization 2003 and 2014 Classifications.

Authors:  Aylin Sar; Qiuli Duan; Moosa Khalil; Lisa M DiFrancesco; Carol Ewanowich; Alice Lytwyn; Bojana Djordjevic; Doha Itani; Sandra Lee; Martin Köbel; Sarah Glaze; Elena Park; Máire A Duggan
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 6.  Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: Pathologic features, treatment options, clinical outcome and prognostic variables.

Authors:  Angiolo Gadducci; Maria Elena Guerrieri; Stefania Cosio
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2019-01-19       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 7.  Tissue-based Immunohistochemical Biomarker Expression in Malignant Glandular Lesions of the Uterine Cervix: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sandra Lee; Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe; Diana Mendoza-Cervantes; Rachel Zhao; Máire A Duggan
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.762

8.  FIGO Stage Is the Strongest Prognostic Factor in Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix.

Authors:  Sarah Glaze; Qiuli Duan; Aylin Sar; Sandra Lee; Martin Köbel; Elena Park; Máire A Duggan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2019-04-19

9.  Detection of transcriptionally active high-risk HPV in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma as visualized by a novel E6/E7 mRNA in situ hybridization method.

Authors:  Justin A Bishop; Xiao-Jun Ma; Hongwei Wang; Yuling Luo; Peter B Illei; Shanaz Begum; Janis M Taube; Wayne M Koch; William H Westra
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Whole Slide Imaging Versus Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology: A Multicenter Blinded Randomized Noninferiority Study of 1992 Cases (Pivotal Study).

Authors:  Sanjay Mukhopadhyay; Michael D Feldman; Esther Abels; Raheela Ashfaq; Senda Beltaifa; Nicolas G Cacciabeve; Helen P Cathro; Liang Cheng; Kumarasen Cooper; Glenn E Dickey; Ryan M Gill; Robert P Heaton; René Kerstens; Guy M Lindberg; Reenu K Malhotra; James W Mandell; Ellen D Manlucu; Anne M Mills; Stacey E Mills; Christopher A Moskaluk; Mischa Nelis; Deepa T Patil; Christopher G Przybycin; Jordan P Reynolds; Brian P Rubin; Mohammad H Saboorian; Mauricio Salicru; Mark A Samols; Charles D Sturgis; Kevin O Turner; Mark R Wick; Ji Y Yoon; Po Zhao; Clive R Taylor
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.394

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.