| Literature DB >> 30819202 |
Fabio Grizzi1,2,3, Sirio Fiorino4, Dorina Qehajaj5, Adele Fornelli6, Carlo Russo7, Dario de Biase8, Michele Masetti9, Laura Mastrangelo9, Matteo Zanello9, Raffaele Lombardi9, Andrea Domanico10, Esterita Accogli10, Andrea Tura11, Leonardo Mirandola12, Maurizio Chiriva-Internati12,13, Robert S Bresalier13, Elio Jovine9, Paolo Leandri4, Luca Di Tommaso14,15.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A hallmark of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is the desmoplastic reaction, but its impact on the tumor behavior remains controversial. Our aim was to introduce a computer -aided method to precisely quantify the amount of pancreatic collagenic extra-cellular matrix, its spatial distribution pattern, and the degradation process.Entities:
Keywords: Degradation; Extra-cellular matrix; Fractals; Modeling; Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Year: 2019 PMID: 30819202 PMCID: PMC6393991 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-1817-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Clinical characteristics of patients included in the study
| Patients | 18 |
| Sex | Male: 9 (50%) |
| Female: 9 (50%) | |
| Age (years) | 65.8 ± 2.55 (range 36–78) |
| Histological diagnosis | PDAC: 7 |
| CP: 6 | |
| NP: 5 | |
| Ca 19–9 (U/ml) | 61.3 ± 24.4 (range 2.5–182) |
| CEA (ng/ml) | 5.9 ± 2.35 (range 1.2–18.3) |
PDAC pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, CP chronic pancreatitis, NP normal pancreas, SE standard error
Fig. 1The deposition of collagen extracellular-matrix drastically increases from natural pancreas (a) to pancreatitis (b) and adenocarcinoma (c). We found statistically significant difference when comparing the percentage of ECM matrix (d) and its 2-D surface fractal dimension (e). ***p < 0.0001 by Student’s t-test
Fig. 2The fractal (i.e. non-integer) dimension is a real number that can be attributed to every natural object. The topological dimension of an object is indicated with the symbol Dγ, whereas the fractional dimension simply with D. For all Euclidean figures, Dγ and D are coincident, i.e., Dγ = D (a). This equality is not valid for the natural, including biological, objects. Natural objects can be roughly represented by Euclidean shapes (i.e., a tree resembles a cylinder, the sun is similar to a sphere, a mountain can be interpreted as a cone), but in reality, these shapes are not Euclidean figures. As suggested by Benoit Mandelbrot, it is possible to determine the Hausdorff–Besicovitch dimension or FD, of irregularly shaped objects through the covering procedure of the topological space of the object being measured. The software automatically estimates the 2D-fractal dimension of Sirius red stained pancreatic ECM (b, c). The more D tends to 2 the more the analyzed conformation tends to fill a 2D space and the greater it’s the geometrical complexity. Pancreatic desmoplasia consists of a set of irregularly shaped “collagen islets” (d)
Fig. 3Computer-aided simulation of pancreatic ECM degradation (a–c). A statistically significant difference was found when compared the number of cycles necessary to erode the ECM in normal parenchyma versus parenchyma affected by pancreatitis and PDAC. A statistically significant difference was also found comparing the number of cycles (d) necessary to erode the ECM infiltrating the parenchyma affected by pancreatitis and that of PDAC. Also, when we analyzed the velocity of degradation (e) we found that this simulated phenomenon is faster in pancreatitis and PDAC than in natural pancreatic tissue. In contrast, no significant statistically differences were found when compared the simulated velocity of degradation between pancreatitis and PDAC (e). ***p < 0.001 by Student’s t-test; **p < 0.01 by Student’s t-test
Geometrical features of Sirius red stained pancreatic collagenic ECM and simulated degradation
| Computer-aided morphometric analysis | Computer modeling | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | ROI | Sirius-red stained surface (%) | Sirius-red stained collagenic ECM geometrical complexity (D) | Erosion cycles (n) | Erosion velocity | |
| Natural pancreatic tissue | 5 | 50 | 2.23 ± 0.28 | 1.36 ± 0.02 | 12.94 ± 0.94 | 0.15 ± 0.01 |
| Pancreatitis | 6 | 60 | 14.27 ± 1.27 | 1.70 ± 0.01 | 21.27 ± 1.43 | 0.67 ± 0.04 |
| PDAC | 7 | 70 | 22.30 ± 2.03 | 1.74 ± 0.01 | 27.61 ± 1.43 | 0.73 ± 0.04 |
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation
ROI region of interest, PDAC pancreatic adenocarcinoma