Saramati Narasimhan1, Haley B Johnson2, Tanner M Nickles2, Michael I Miga1,3, Nitesh Rana4, Albert Attia4, Jared A Weis2,5. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, 5824 Stevenson Center, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA. 3. Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (VISE), Nashville, TN, USA. 4. Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA. 5. Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, 27157, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used for local control treatment of patients with intracranial metastases. As a result of SRS, some patients develop radiation-induced necrosis. Radiographically, radiation-induced necrosis can appear similar to tumor recurrence in magnetic resonance (MR) T1 -weighted contrast-enhanced imaging, T2 -weighted MR imaging, and Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) MR imaging. Radiographic ambiguities often necessitate invasive brain biopsies to determine lesion etiology or cause delayed subsequent therapy initiation. We use a biomechanically coupled tumor growth model to estimate patient-specific model parameters and model-derived measures to noninvasively classify etiology of enhancing lesions in this patient population. METHODS: In this initial, preliminary retrospective study, we evaluated five patients with tumor recurrence and five with radiation-induced necrosis. Longitudinal patient-specific MR imaging data were used in conjunction with the model to parameterize tumor cell proliferation rate and tumor cell diffusion coefficient, and Dice correlation coefficients were used to quantify degree of correlation between model-estimated mechanical stress fields and edema visualized from MR imaging. RESULTS: Results found four statistically relevant parameters which can differentiate tumor recurrence and radiation-induced necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary investigation suggests potential of this framework to noninvasively determine the etiology of enhancing lesions in patients who previously underwent SRS for intracranial metastases.
PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used for local control treatment of patients with intracranial metastases. As a result of SRS, some patients develop radiation-induced necrosis. Radiographically, radiation-induced necrosis can appear similar to tumor recurrence in magnetic resonance (MR) T1 -weighted contrast-enhanced imaging, T2 -weighted MR imaging, and Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) MR imaging. Radiographic ambiguities often necessitate invasive brain biopsies to determine lesion etiology or cause delayed subsequent therapy initiation. We use a biomechanically coupled tumor growth model to estimate patient-specific model parameters and model-derived measures to noninvasively classify etiology of enhancing lesions in this patient population. METHODS: In this initial, preliminary retrospective study, we evaluated five patients with tumor recurrence and five with radiation-induced necrosis. Longitudinal patient-specific MR imaging data were used in conjunction with the model to parameterize tumor cell proliferation rate and tumor cell diffusion coefficient, and Dice correlation coefficients were used to quantify degree of correlation between model-estimated mechanical stress fields and edema visualized from MR imaging. RESULTS: Results found four statistically relevant parameters which can differentiate tumor recurrence and radiation-induced necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary investigation suggests potential of this framework to noninvasively determine the etiology of enhancing lesions in patients who previously underwent SRS for intracranial metastases.
Authors: Marc C Chamberlain; Michael J Glantz; Lisa Chalmers; Alixis Van Horn; Andrew E Sloan Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2006-08-31 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Mark E Mullins; Glenn D Barest; Pamela W Schaefer; Fred H Hochberg; R Gilberto Gonzalez; Michael H Lev Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Olivier Clatz; Maxime Sermesant; Pierre-Yves Bondiau; Hervé Delingette; Simon K Warfield; Grégoire Malandain; Nicholas Ayache Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Pia C Sundgren; Xiaoying Fan; Patrick Weybright; Robert C Welsh; Ruth C Carlos; Myria Petrou; Paul E McKeever; Thomas L Chenevert Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2006-09-18 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Jack P Rock; Lisa Scarpace; David Hearshen; Jorge Gutierrez; James L Fisher; Mark Rosenblum; Tom Mikkelsen Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Saramati Narasimhan; Jared A Weis; Ma Luo; Amber L Simpson; Reid C Thompson; Michael I Miga Journal: J Med Imaging (Bellingham) Date: 2020-06-22
Authors: Ammoren E Dohm; Tanner M Nickles; Caroline E Miller; Haley J Bowers; Michael I Miga; Albert Attia; Michael D Chan; Jared A Weis Journal: Med Phys Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 4.506