Literature DB >> 17071335

Differentiation of recurrent brain tumor versus radiation injury using diffusion tensor imaging in patients with new contrast-enhancing lesions.

Pia C Sundgren1, Xiaoying Fan, Patrick Weybright, Robert C Welsh, Ruth C Carlos, Myria Petrou, Paul E McKeever, Thomas L Chenevert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the use of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in the evaluation of new contrast-enhancing lesions and perilesional edema in patients previously treated for brain neoplasm in the differentiation of recurrent neoplasm from treatment-related injury.
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with new contrast-enhancing lesions and perilesional edema at the site of previously treated brain neoplasms were retrospectively reviewed. Nine directional echoplanar DTIs with b=1000 s/mm(2) were obtained using a single-shot spin-echo echoplanar imaging. Standardized regions of interest were manually drawn in several regions. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fractional anisotropy (FA) and eigenvalue indices (lambda( parallel) and lambda( perpendicular)) and their ratios relative to the contralateral side were compared in patients with recurrent neoplasm versus patients with radiation injury, as established by histological examination or by clinical course, including long-term imaging studies and magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
RESULTS: The ADC values in the contrast-enhancing lesions were significantly higher (P=.01) for the recurrence group (range=1.01 x 10(-3) to 1.66 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s; mean+/-S.D.=1.27+/-0.15) than for the nonrecurrence group (range=0.9 x 10(-3) to 1.31 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s; mean+/-S.D.=1.12+/-0.14). The ADC ratios in the white matter tracts in perilesional edema trended higher (P=.09) in treatment-related injury than in recurrent neoplasm (mean+/-S.D.=1.85+/-0.30 vs. 1.60+/-0.27, respectively). FA ratios were significantly higher in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) tracts adjacent to the edema in the nonrecurrence group (mean+/-S.D.=0.89+/-0.15) than in those in the recurrence group (mean+/-S.D.=0.74+/-0.14; P=.03). Both eigenvalue indices lambda( parallel) and lambda( perpendicular) were significantly higher in contrast-enhancing lesions in the recurrence group than in those in the nonrecurrence group (P=.02). As well, both eigenvalue indices lambda( parallel) and lambda( perpendicular) were significantly higher in perilesional edema than in normal white matter (P<.01 and P<.001, respectively) in both groups.
CONCLUSION: The assessment of diffusion properties, especially ADC values and ADC ratios, in contrast-enhancing lesions, perilesional edema and NAWM adjacent to the edema in the follow-up of new contrast-enhancing lesions at the site of previously treated brain neoplasms may add to the information obtained by other imaging techniques in the differentiation of radiation injury from tumor recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17071335     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2006.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  73 in total

1.  Bevacizumab: radiation combination produces restricted diffusion on brain MRI.

Authors:  John R Hesselink; Matthew J Barkovich; Tyler M Seibert; Nikdokht Farid; Karra A Muller; Kevin T Murphy; Santosh Kesari
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2014

2.  Support vector machine multiparametric MRI identification of pseudoprogression from tumor recurrence in patients with resected glioblastoma.

Authors:  Xintao Hu; Kelvin K Wong; Geoffrey S Young; Lei Guo; Stephen T Wong
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Clinical applications of imaging biomarkers. Part 3. The neuro-oncologist's perspective.

Authors:  A Shenoy
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Treatment induced necrosis versus recurrent/progressing brain tumor: going beyond the boundaries of conventional morphologic imaging.

Authors:  Rajan Jain; Jayant Narang; Pia M Sundgren; David Hearshen; Sona Saksena; Jack P Rock; Jorge Gutierrez; Tom Mikkelsen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Diffusion tensor imaging of the brain.

Authors:  Andrew L Alexander; Jee Eun Lee; Mariana Lazar; Aaron S Field
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 7.620

6.  Neuroimaging of stroke and ischemia in animal models.

Authors:  Andre Obenaus; Stephan Ashwal
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 6.829

7.  Comparison of Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging in Differentiating Recurrent Brain Neoplasm From Radiation Necrosis.

Authors:  William R Masch; Page I Wang; Thomas L Chenevert; Larry Junck; Christina Tsien; Jason A Heth; Pia C Sundgren
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  Response-driven imaging biomarkers for predicting radiation necrosis of the brain.

Authors:  Mohammad-Reza Nazem-Zadeh; Christopher H Chapman; Thomas Chenevert; Theodore S Lawrence; Randall K Ten Haken; Christina I Tsien; Yue Cao
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Brain irradiation: effects on normal brain parenchyma and radiation injury.

Authors:  Pia C Sundgren; Yue Cao
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Comparison of the effectiveness of MRI perfusion and fluorine-18 FDG PET-CT for differentiating radiation injury from viable brain tumor: a preliminary retrospective analysis with pathologic correlation in all patients.

Authors:  Vaios Hatzoglou; Gary A Ulaner; Zhigang Zhang; Kathryn Beal; Andrei I Holodny; Robert J Young
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 1.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.