Literature DB >> 30814311

Medial Prefrontal Cortex Population Activity Is Plastic Irrespective of Learning.

Abhinav Singh1, Adrien Peyrache2, Mark D Humphries3,4.   

Abstract

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is thought to learn the relationships between actions and their outcomes. But little is known about what changes to population activity in PFC are specific to learning these relationships. Here we characterize the plasticity of population activity in the medial PFC (mPFC) of male rats learning rules on a Y-maze. First, we show that the population always changes its patterns of joint activity between the periods of sleep either side of a training session on the maze, regardless of successful rule learning during training. Next, by comparing the structure of population activity in sleep and training, we show that this population plasticity differs between learning and nonlearning sessions. In learning sessions, the changes in population activity in post-training sleep incorporate the changes to the population activity during training on the maze. In nonlearning sessions, the changes in sleep and training are unrelated. Finally, we show evidence that the nonlearning and learning forms of population plasticity are driven by different neuron-level changes, with the nonlearning form entirely accounted for by independent changes to the excitability of individual neurons, and the learning form also including changes to firing rate couplings between neurons. Collectively, our results suggest two different forms of population plasticity in mPFC during the learning of action-outcome relationships: one a persistent change in population activity structure decoupled from overt rule-learning, and the other a directional change driven by feedback during behavior.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The PFC is thought to represent our knowledge about what action is worth doing in which context. But we do not know how the activity of neurons in PFC collectively changes when learning which actions are relevant. Here we show, in a trial-and-error task, that population activity in PFC is persistently changing, regardless of learning. Only during episodes of clear learning of relevant actions are the accompanying changes to population activity carried forward into sleep, suggesting a long-lasting form of neural plasticity. Our results suggest that representations of relevant actions in PFC are acquired by reward imposing a direction onto ongoing population plasticity.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  neural ensembles; population activity; statistical inference

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30814311      PMCID: PMC6495133          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1370-17.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  52 in total

1.  Linking spontaneous activity of single cortical neurons and the underlying functional architecture.

Authors:  M Tsodyks; T Kenet; A Grinvald; A Arieli
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-12-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Neural representation and the cortical code.

Authors:  R C deCharms; A Zador
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Involvement of rodent prefrontal cortex subregions in strategy switching.

Authors:  M E Ragozzino; C Wilcox; M Raso; R P Kesner
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Accuracy of tetrode spike separation as determined by simultaneous intracellular and extracellular measurements.

Authors:  K D Harris; D A Henze; J Csicsvari; H Hirase; G Buzsáki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Failure in identification of overlapping spikes from multiple neuron activity causes artificial correlations.

Authors:  I Bar-Gad; Y Ritov; E Vaadia; H Bergman
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2001-05-30       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Involvement of the prelimbic-infralimbic areas of the rodent prefrontal cortex in behavioral flexibility for place and response learning.

Authors:  M E Ragozzino; S Detrick; R P Kesner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Firing rate modulation: a simple statistical view of memory trace reactivation.

Authors:  Francesco P Battaglia; Gary R Sutherland; Stephen L Cowen; Bruce L Mc Naughton; Kenneth D Harris
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2005-10-27

8.  Solving the distal reward problem through linkage of STDP and dopamine signaling.

Authors:  Eugene M Izhikevich
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  The principal features and mechanisms of dopamine modulation in the prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Jeremy K Seamans; Charles R Yang
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Prelimbic/infralimbic inactivation impairs memory for multiple task switches, but not flexible selection of familiar tasks.

Authors:  Erin L Rich; Matthew L Shapiro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  7 in total

1.  Coordinated Prefrontal State Transition Leads Extinction of Reward-Seeking Behaviors.

Authors:  Eleonora Russo; Tianyang Ma; Rainer Spanagel; Daniel Durstewitz; Hazem Toutounji; Georg Köhr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  How learning unfolds in the brain: toward an optimization view.

Authors:  Jay A Hennig; Emily R Oby; Darby M Losey; Aaron P Batista; Byron M Yu; Steven M Chase
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Dose-Dependent Regulation on Prefrontal Neuronal Working Memory by Dopamine D1 Agonists: Evidence of Receptor Functional Selectivity-Related Mechanisms.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Susan D Kocher; Mechelle M Lewis; Richard B Mailman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 5.152

Review 4.  Involvement of the rodent prelimbic and medial orbitofrontal cortices in goal-directed action: A brief review.

Authors:  Ellen P Woon; Michelle K Sequeira; Britton R Barbee; Shannon L Gourley
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Stable task information from an unstable neural population.

Authors:  Michael E Rule; Adrianna R Loback; Dhruva V Raman; Laura N Driscoll; Christopher D Harvey; Timothy O'Leary
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Self-healing codes: How stable neural populations can track continually reconfiguring neural representations.

Authors:  Michael E Rule; Timothy O'Leary
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Activity Subspaces in Medial Prefrontal Cortex Distinguish States of the World.

Authors:  Silvia Maggi; Mark D Humphries
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 6.709

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.