Literature DB >> 30811931

Potential Mean Force from Umbrella Sampling Simulations: What Can We Learn and What Is Missed?

Wanli You1, Zhiye Tang1, Chia-En A Chang1.   

Abstract

Changes in free energy provide valuable information for molecular recognition, including both ligand-receptor binding thermodynamics and kinetics. Umbrella sampling (US), a widely used free energy calculation method, has long been used to explore the dissociation process of ligand-receptor systems and compute binding free energy. In existing publications, the binding free energy computed from the potential of mean force (PMF) with US simulation mostly yielded "ball park" values with experimental data. However, the computed PMF values are highly influenced by factors such as initial conformations and/or trajectories provided, the reaction coordinate, and sampling of conformational space in each US window. These critical factors have rarely been carefully studied. Here we used US to study the guest aspirin and 1-butanol dissociation processes of β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) and an inhibitor SB2 dissociation from a p38α mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) complex. For β-CD, we used three different β-CD conformations to generate the dissociation path with US windows. For p38α, we generated the dissociation pathway by using accelerated molecular dynamics followed by conformational relaxing with short conventional MD, steered MD, and manual pulling. We found that, even for small β-CD complexes, different β-CD conformations altered the height of the PMF, but the pattern of PMF was not affected if the MD sampling in each US window was well-converged. Because changing the macrocyclic ring conformation needs to rotate dihedral angles in the ring, a bound ligand largely restrains the motion of cyclodextrin. Therefore, once a guest is in the binding site, cyclodextrin cannot freely change its initial conformation, resulting in different absolute heights of the PMF, which cannot be overcome by running excessively long MD simulations for each US window. Moreover, if the US simulations were not converged, the important barrier and minimum were missed. For ligand-protein systems, our studies also suggest that the dissociation trajectories modeled by an enhanced sampling method must maintain a natural molecular movement to avoid biased PMF plots when using US simulations.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30811931      PMCID: PMC6456367          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  50 in total

Review 1.  p38 MAP kinase: molecular target for the inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Authors:  J L Adams; A M Badger; S Kumar; J C Lee
Journal:  Prog Med Chem       Date:  2001

2.  Complexation Thermodynamics of Cyclodextrins.

Authors:  Mikhail V. Rekharsky; Yoshihisa Inoue
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1998-07-30       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  The conformational plasticity of protein kinases.

Authors:  Morgan Huse; John Kuriyan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-05-03       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Energetics of glycerol conduction through aquaglyceroporin GlpF.

Authors:  Morten Ø Jensen; Sanghyun Park; Emad Tajkhorshid; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A Biacore biosensor method for detailed kinetic binding analysis of small molecule inhibitors of p38alpha mitogen-activated protein kinase.

Authors:  David Casper; Marina Bukhtiyarova; Eric B Springman
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2004-02-01       Impact factor: 3.365

Review 6.  p38 MAP kinases: key signalling molecules as therapeutic targets for inflammatory diseases.

Authors:  Sanjay Kumar; Jeffrey Boehm; John C Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 84.694

7.  Accelerated molecular dynamics: a promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules.

Authors:  Donald Hamelberg; John Mongan; J Andrew McCammon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Calculation of cyclodextrin binding affinities: energy, entropy, and implications for drug design.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Chia-En Chang; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  NMR characterization of kinase p38 dynamics in free and ligand-bound forms.

Authors:  Martin Vogtherr; Krishna Saxena; Swen Hoelder; Susanne Grimme; Marco Betz; Ulrich Schieborr; Barbara Pescatore; Michel Robin; Laure Delarbre; Thomas Langer; K Ulrich Wendt; Harald Schwalbe
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 10.  New approaches to the treatment of inflammatory disorders small molecule inhibitors of p38 MAP kinase.

Authors:  Christian Peifer; Gerd Wagner; Stefan Laufer
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  9 in total

1.  The SAMPL6 SAMPLing challenge: assessing the reliability and efficiency of binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Andrea Rizzi; Travis Jensen; David R Slochower; Matteo Aldeghi; Vytautas Gapsys; Dimitris Ntekoumes; Stefano Bosisio; Michail Papadourakis; Niel M Henriksen; Bert L de Groot; Zoe Cournia; Alex Dickson; Julien Michel; Michael K Gilson; Michael R Shirts; David L Mobley; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Markov state modeling reveals alternative unbinding pathways for peptide-MHC complexes.

Authors:  Jayvee R Abella; Dinler Antunes; Kyle Jackson; Gregory Lizée; Cecilia Clementi; Lydia E Kavraki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Exploring the Free-Energy Landscape and Thermodynamics of Protein-Protein Association.

Authors:  Celine Tse; Lauren Wickstrom; Mamuka Kvaratskhelia; Emilio Gallicchio; Ronald Levy; Nanjie Deng
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Different modes of barrel opening suggest a complex pathway of ligand binding in human gastrotropin.

Authors:  Zita Harmat; András L Szabó; Orsolya Tőke; Zoltán Gáspári
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Collective variable discovery in the age of machine learning: reality, hype and everything in between.

Authors:  Soumendranath Bhakat
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  Docking and Molecular Dynamics-Based Identification of Interaction between Various Beta-Amyloid Isoforms and RAGE Receptor.

Authors:  Anna P Tolstova; Alexei A Adzhubei; Vladimir A Mitkevich; Irina Yu Petrushanko; Alexander A Makarov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  ESR, STESR, DFT, and MD Study of the Dynamical Structure of Cucurbituril[7]-Spin Probe Guest-Host Complexes.

Authors:  Vsevolod A Livshits; Boris B Meshkov; Vitaly G Avakyan; Sergei V Titov
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-05-18

8.  In silico assessment of human Calprotectin subunits (S100A8/A9) in presence of sodium and calcium ions using Molecular Dynamics simulation approach.

Authors:  Nematollah Gheibi; Mohammad Ghorbani; Hanifeh Shariatifar; Alireza Farasat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Validation of DBFOLD: An efficient algorithm for computing folding pathways of complex proteins.

Authors:  Amir Bitran; William M Jacobs; Eugene Shakhnovich
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 4.475

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.