Rafael Ceschin1,2,3, Mehmet Kocak4, Sridhar Vajapeyam5,6, Ian F Pollack7, Arzu Onar-Thomas4, Ira J Dunkel8, Tina Young Poussaint5,6, Ashok Panigrahy9,10. 1. Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 4401 Penn Avenue, Suite 2464, Pittsburgh, PA, 15201, USA. Rafael.Ceschin@chp.edu. 2. Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Rafael.Ceschin@chp.edu. 3. Pediatric Imaging Research Center, Department of Pediatric Radiology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, 45th Street and Penn Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15224, USA. Rafael.Ceschin@chp.edu. 4. Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA. 5. Department of Preventive Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA. 6. Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. 7. Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. 8. Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 9. Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 4401 Penn Avenue, Suite 2464, Pittsburgh, PA, 15201, USA. 10. Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Baseline diffusion or apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) characteristics have been shown to predict outcome related to DIPG, but the predictive value of post-radiation ADC is less well understood. ADC parametric mapping (FDM) was used to measure radiation-related changes in ADC and compared these metrics to baseline ADC in predicting progression-free survival and overall survival using a large multi-center cohort of DIPG patients (Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium-PBTC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR studies at baseline and post-RT in 95 DIPG patients were obtained and serial quantitative ADC parametric maps were generated from diffusion-weighted imaging based on T2/FLAIR and enhancement regions of interest (ROIs). Metrics assessed included total voxels with: increase in ADC (iADC); decrease in ADC (dADC), no change in ADC (nADC), fraction of voxels with increased ADC (fiADC), fraction of voxels with decreased ADC (fdADC), and the ratio of fiADC and fdADC (fDM Ratio). RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were included in the final analysis. Tumors with higher fiADC between baseline and the first RT time point showed a trend toward shorter PFS with a hazard ratio of 6.44 (CI 0.79, 52.79, p = 0.083). In contrast, tumors with higher log mean ADC at baseline had longer PFS, with a hazard ratio of 0.27 (CI 0.09, 0.82, p = 0.022). There was no significant association between fDM derived metrics and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline ADC values are a stronger predictor of outcome compared to radiation related ADC changes in pediatric DIPG. We show the feasibility of employing parametric mapping techniques in multi-center studies to quantitate spatially heterogeneous treatment response in pediatric tumors, including DIPG.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Baseline diffusion or apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) characteristics have been shown to predict outcome related to DIPG, but the predictive value of post-radiation ADC is less well understood. ADC parametric mapping (FDM) was used to measure radiation-related changes in ADC and compared these metrics to baseline ADC in predicting progression-free survival and overall survival using a large multi-center cohort of DIPGpatients (Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium-PBTC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR studies at baseline and post-RT in 95 DIPGpatients were obtained and serial quantitative ADC parametric maps were generated from diffusion-weighted imaging based on T2/FLAIR and enhancement regions of interest (ROIs). Metrics assessed included total voxels with: increase in ADC (iADC); decrease in ADC (dADC), no change in ADC (nADC), fraction of voxels with increased ADC (fiADC), fraction of voxels with decreased ADC (fdADC), and the ratio of fiADC and fdADC (fDM Ratio). RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were included in the final analysis. Tumors with higher fiADC between baseline and the first RT time point showed a trend toward shorter PFS with a hazard ratio of 6.44 (CI 0.79, 52.79, p = 0.083). In contrast, tumors with higher log mean ADC at baseline had longer PFS, with a hazard ratio of 0.27 (CI 0.09, 0.82, p = 0.022). There was no significant association between fDM derived metrics and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline ADC values are a stronger predictor of outcome compared to radiation related ADC changes in pediatric DIPG. We show the feasibility of employing parametric mapping techniques in multi-center studies to quantitate spatially heterogeneous treatment response in pediatric tumors, including DIPG.
Authors: Kenneth J Cohen; Richard L Heideman; Tianni Zhou; Emiko J Holmes; Robert S Lavey; Eric Bouffet; Ian F Pollack Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Bradford A Moffat; Thomas L Chenevert; Theodore S Lawrence; Charles R Meyer; Timothy D Johnson; Qian Dong; Christina Tsien; Suresh Mukherji; Douglas J Quint; Stephen S Gebarski; Patricia L Robertson; Larry R Junck; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2005-04-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Benjamin M Ellingson; Mark G Malkin; Scott D Rand; Jennifer M Connelly; Carolyn Quinsey; Pete S LaViolette; Devyani P Bedekar; Kathleen M Schmainda Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Tina Young Poussaint; Mehmet Kocak; Sridhar Vajapeyam; Roger I Packer; Richard L Robertson; Russell Geyer; Daphne Haas-Kogan; Ian F Pollack; Gilbert Vezina; Robert Zimmerman; Soonmee Cha; Zoltan Patay; James M Boyett; Larry E Kun Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: U Löbel; J Sedlacik; W E Reddick; M Kocak; Q Ji; A Broniscer; C M Hillenbrand; Z Patay Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-11-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Yuxi Pang; Dariya I Malyarenko; Ghoncheh Amouzandeh; Enzo Barberi; Michael Cole; Axel Vom Endt; Johannes Peeters; Ek T Tan; Thomas L Chenevert Journal: Phys Med Date: 2021-06-06 Impact factor: 3.119
Authors: S Vajapeyam; D Brown; C Billups; Z Patay; G Vezina; M S Shiroishi; M Law; P Baxter; A Onar-Thomas; J R Fangusaro; I J Dunkel; T Y Poussaint Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-04-02 Impact factor: 4.966