PURPOSE: To present comprehensive examinations of the assumptions made in functional diffusion map (fDM) analyses and provide a biological basis for fDM classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with gliomas were enrolled in this study. To determine the sensitivity of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) to cellularity, cell density from stereotactic biopsy specimens was correlated with preoperative ADC maps. For definition of ADC thresholds used for fDMs, the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for changes in voxel-wise ADC measurements in normal appearing tissue was analyzed. The sensitivity and specificity to progressing disease was examined using both radiographic and neurological criteria. RESULTS: Results support the hypothesis that ADC is inversely proportional to cell density with a sensitivity of 1.01 x 10(-7) [mm(2)/s]/[nuclei/mm(2)]. The 95% CI for white matter = 0.25 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, gray matter = 0.31 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, a mixture of white and gray matter = 0.40 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, and a mixture of white matter, gray matter, and cerebrospinal fluid = 0.75 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. Application of these measurements as ADC thresholds produce varying levels of sensitivity and specificity to disease progression, which were all significantly better than chance. CONCLUSION: This study suggests fDMs are valid biomarkers for brain tumor cellularity.
PURPOSE: To present comprehensive examinations of the assumptions made in functional diffusion map (fDM) analyses and provide a biological basis for fDM classification. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-nine patients with gliomas were enrolled in this study. To determine the sensitivity of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) to cellularity, cell density from stereotactic biopsy specimens was correlated with preoperative ADC maps. For definition of ADC thresholds used for fDMs, the 95% confidence intervals (CI) for changes in voxel-wise ADC measurements in normal appearing tissue was analyzed. The sensitivity and specificity to progressing disease was examined using both radiographic and neurological criteria. RESULTS: Results support the hypothesis that ADC is inversely proportional to cell density with a sensitivity of 1.01 x 10(-7) [mm(2)/s]/[nuclei/mm(2)]. The 95% CI for white matter = 0.25 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, gray matter = 0.31 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, a mixture of white and gray matter = 0.40 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, and a mixture of white matter, gray matter, and cerebrospinal fluid = 0.75 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. Application of these measurements as ADC thresholds produce varying levels of sensitivity and specificity to disease progression, which were all significantly better than chance. CONCLUSION: This study suggests fDMs are valid biomarkers for brain tumor cellularity.
Authors: Bradford A Moffat; Thomas L Chenevert; Charles R Meyer; Paul E McKeever; Daniel E Hall; Benjamin A Hoff; Timothy D Johnson; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Y Hayashida; T Hirai; S Morishita; M Kitajima; R Murakami; Y Korogi; K Makino; H Nakamura; I Ikushima; M Yamura; M Kochi; J-i Kuratsu; Y Yamashita Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: T L Chenevert; L D Stegman; J M Taylor; P L Robertson; H S Greenberg; A Rehemtulla; B D Ross Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-12-20 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: G Manenti; M Di Roma; S Mancino; D A Bartolucci; G Palmieri; R Mastrangeli; R Miano; E Squillaci; G Simonetti Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2008-04-02 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Anwar R Padhani; Guoying Liu; Dow Mu Koh; Thomas L Chenevert; Harriet C Thoeny; Taro Takahara; Andrew Dzik-Jurasz; Brian D Ross; Marc Van Cauteren; David Collins; Dima A Hammoud; Gordon J S Rustin; Bachir Taouli; Peter L Choyke Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Daniel A Hamstra; Craig J Galbán; Charles R Meyer; Timothy D Johnson; Pia C Sundgren; Christina Tsien; Theodore S Lawrence; Larry Junck; David J Ross; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross; Thomas L Chenevert Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Benjamin M Ellingson; Timothy F Cloughesy; Taryar Zaw; Albert Lai; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Robert Harris; Shadi Lalezari; Naveed Wagle; Kourosh M Naeini; Jose Carrillo; Linda M Liau; Whitney B Pope Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2012-01-22 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Benjamin M Ellingson; Martin Bendszus; Jerrold Boxerman; Daniel Barboriak; Bradley J Erickson; Marion Smits; Sarah J Nelson; Elizabeth Gerstner; Brian Alexander; Gregory Goldmacher; Wolfgang Wick; Michael Vogelbaum; Michael Weller; Evanthia Galanis; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Lalitha Shankar; Paula Jacobs; Whitney B Pope; Dewen Yang; Caroline Chung; Michael V Knopp; Soonme Cha; Martin J van den Bent; Susan Chang; W K Al Yung; Timothy F Cloughesy; Patrick Y Wen; Mark R Gilbert Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: S Mong; B M Ellingson; P L Nghiemphu; H J Kim; L Mirsadraei; A Lai; W Yong; T M Zaw; T F Cloughesy; W B Pope Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ararat Chakhoyan; Davis C Woodworth; Robert J Harris; Albert Lai; Phioanh L Nghiemphu; Linda M Liau; Whitney B Pope; Timothy F Cloughesy; Benjamin M Ellingson Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Alexander D Cohen; Peter S LaViolette; Melissa Prah; Jennifer Connelly; Mark G Malkin; Scott D Rand; Wade M Mueller; Kathleen M Schmainda Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Kathleen M Schmainda; Melissa Prah; Jennifer Connelly; Scott D Rand; Raymond G Hoffman; Wade Mueller; Mark G Malkin Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 12.300