BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Focal anaplasia characterized by T2 hypointensity, signal-intensity enhancement on postcontrast T1-weighted MR imaging and restricted water diffusion has been reported in a patient with juvenile pilocytic astrocytoma. We identified T2(HOF) with these MR imaging characteristics in children with DIPG and hypothesized that these represent areas of focal anaplasia; and may, therefore, have increased perfusion properties and should be characterized by increased perfusion. Thus, we used DSC to investigate our hypothesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the baseline MR imaging scans of 86 patients (49 girls, 37 boys; median age, 6.1 years; range, 1.1-17.6 years) treated for DIPG at our hospital (2004-2009). T2(HOF) with the described MR imaging characteristics was identified in 10 patients. We used a region of interest-based approach to compare the ADC, FA, rCBV, rCBF, and rMTT of T2(HOF) with those of the typical T2(HRT). RESULTS: The ADC of T2(HOF) with the specified MR imaging characteristics was significantly lower than that of T2(HRT) (range, 0.71-1.95 μm(2)/ms versus 1.36-2.13 μm(2)/ms; P < .01); and the FA (range, 0.12-0.34 versus 0.07-0.24; P = .03) and rCBV (range, 0.4-2.62 versus 0.23-1.57; P = .01) values of T2(HOF)s were significantly higher. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that T2(HOF) in DIPG may represent areas of focal anaplasia and underline the importance of regional, rather than global, tumor-field analysis. T2(HOF) may be the ideal target when stereotactic biopsy of tumors that present with an inhomogeneous T2 signal intensity is considered.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Focal anaplasia characterized by T2 hypointensity, signal-intensity enhancement on postcontrast T1-weighted MR imaging and restricted water diffusion has been reported in a patient with juvenile pilocytic astrocytoma. We identified T2(HOF) with these MR imaging characteristics in children with DIPG and hypothesized that these represent areas of focal anaplasia; and may, therefore, have increased perfusion properties and should be characterized by increased perfusion. Thus, we used DSC to investigate our hypothesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the baseline MR imaging scans of 86 patients (49 girls, 37 boys; median age, 6.1 years; range, 1.1-17.6 years) treated for DIPG at our hospital (2004-2009). T2(HOF) with the described MR imaging characteristics was identified in 10 patients. We used a region of interest-based approach to compare the ADC, FA, rCBV, rCBF, and rMTT of T2(HOF) with those of the typical T2(HRT). RESULTS: The ADC of T2(HOF) with the specified MR imaging characteristics was significantly lower than that of T2(HRT) (range, 0.71-1.95 μm(2)/ms versus 1.36-2.13 μm(2)/ms; P < .01); and the FA (range, 0.12-0.34 versus 0.07-0.24; P = .03) and rCBV (range, 0.4-2.62 versus 0.23-1.57; P = .01) values of T2(HOF)s were significantly higher. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that T2(HOF) in DIPG may represent areas of focal anaplasia and underline the importance of regional, rather than global, tumor-field analysis. T2(HOF) may be the ideal target when stereotactic biopsy of tumors that present with an inhomogeneous T2 signal intensity is considered.
Authors: Ulrike Löbel; Jan Sedlacik; Daniel Güllmar; Werner A Kaiser; Jürgen R Reichenbach; Hans-Joachim Mentzel Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2009-01-09 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Meng Law; Stanley Yang; James S Babb; Edmond A Knopp; John G Golfinos; David Zagzag; Glyn Johnson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Riyadh N Al-Okaili; Jaroslaw Krejza; John H Woo; Ronald L Wolf; Donald M O'Rourke; Kevin D Judy; Harish Poptani; Elias R Melhem Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Tina Young Poussaint; Sridhar Vajapeyam; Kelsey I Ricci; Ashok Panigrahy; Mehmet Kocak; Larry E Kun; James M Boyett; Ian F Pollack; Maryam Fouladi Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: K Yamashita; A Hiwatashi; O Togao; K Kikuchi; R Hatae; K Yoshimoto; M Mizoguchi; S O Suzuki; T Yoshiura; H Honda Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Robert M Lober; Yoon-Jae Cho; Yujie Tang; Patrick D Barnes; Michael S Edwards; Hannes Vogel; Paul G Fisher; Michelle Monje; Kristen W Yeom Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-02-13 Impact factor: 4.130