Literature DB >> 19168168

Active management of risk in nulliparous pregnancy at term: association between a higher preventive labor induction rate and improved birth outcomes.

James M Nicholson1, Morghan H Stenson, Lisa C Kellar, Aaron B Caughey, George A Macones.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine whether exposure of nulliparous women to a high rate of preventive labor induction was associated with improvement in birth health. STUDY
DESIGN: A risk-scoring system was used to guide the frequent use of preventive labor induction in 100 nulliparous women. The birth outcomes of this group were compared with those of 352 nulliparous women who received usual care. Cesarean delivery was the primary study outcome. The Adverse Outcome Index and the rate of uncomplicated vaginal delivery were used to measure overall birth health.
RESULTS: The exposed group experienced a higher labor induction rate (48% vs 23.6%; P < .001), a lower cesarean rate (9% vs 25.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.36; P = .02), and better composite birth outcomes.
CONCLUSION: Exposure of nulliparous women to a high preventive induction rate was significantly associated with improvement in birth health. Prospective randomized trials are needed to further explore the utility of risk-guided preventive labor induction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19168168      PMCID: PMC2855850          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  35 in total

1.  Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks of gestation: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  K Amano; K Saito; T Shoda; A Tani; H Yoshihara; M Nishijima
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.730

2.  The epidemiology of labor induction: Arizona, 1997.

Authors:  D V Coonrod; R C Bay; G Y Kishi
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Elective primary cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Howard Minkoff; Frank A Chervenak
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Prevention of urinary and anal incontinence: role of elective cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Mira Lal
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.927

5.  Induction of labor and the relationship to cesarean delivery: A review of 7001 consecutive inductions.

Authors:  J D Yeast; A Jones; M Poskin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Hendrik Cammu; Guy Martens; Gunther Ruyssinck; Jean-Jacques Amy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Risk of perinatal death associated with labor after previous cesarean delivery in uncomplicated term pregnancies.

Authors:  Gordon C S Smith; Jill P Pell; Alan D Cameron; Richard Dobbie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women.

Authors:  S T Seyb; R J Berka; M L Socol; S L Dooley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy.

Authors:  Gordon C S Smith; Jill P Pell; Richard Dobbie
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-11-29       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Labor induction versus expectant management for postterm pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Luis Sanchez-Ramos; Felicia Olivier; Isaac Delke; Andrew M Kaunitz
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.