Literature DB >> 826929

Effects of scopolamine and d-amphetamine on locomotor activity before and after shock: a diallel analysis in mice.

H Anisman.   

Abstract

The effect of shock on locomotor activity was evaluated in three strains of mice (A, DBA/2 and C57BL/6) after treatment with scopolamine (1.0 mg/kg) and d-amphetamine (10.0 mg/kh). The effectiveness of either drug in incrasing locomotor activity was strain dependent. Both drugs eliminated behavioral suppression induced by shock, and in A and DBA/2 mice shock augmented the locomotor stimulation induced by d-amphetamine. In another experiment the behavior of the 6 F1 hybrids was examined in relation to the parent strains. It was observed that locomotor activity in the F1's could resemble that seen in one parent in the saline condition, but the other parent after treatment with d-amphetamine. Similarly, the F1 behavior in the amphetamine condition was not predictive of the behavior seen after shock plus amphetamine. The results suggest that general activity, locomotor activity after amphetamine treatment, and responsiveness following shock in amphetamine-treated mice are mediated by different genetic mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 826929     DOI: 10.1007/BF00423256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  22 in total

1.  Task complexity as a factor in eliciting heterosis in mice: aversively motivated behaviors.

Authors:  H Anisman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1975-10

Review 2.  Time-dependent variations in aversively motivated behaviors: nonassociative effects of cholinergic and catecholaminergic activity.

Authors:  H Anisman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Genetic experiments with animal learning: a critical review.

Authors:  D Wahlsten
Journal:  Behav Biol       Date:  1972-04

4.  Comparative study of acetylcholinesterase and choline acetyltransferase enzyme activity in brain of DBA and C 57 mice.

Authors:  A Ebel; J C Hermetet; P Mandel
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1973-03-14

5.  Regional brain norepinephrine turnover rates in four strains of mice.

Authors:  B E Eleftheriou
Journal:  Neuroendocrinology       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 4.914

6.  Effects of intrahippocampal injections with methylscopolamine and neostigmine upon exploratory behaviour in two inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  J Van Abeelen; L Gilissen; T Hanssen; A Lenders
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1972

7.  Genotype-dependent effects of scopolamine and eserine on exploratory behaviour in mice.

Authors:  J H van Abeelen; H Strijbosch
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1969

8.  [Central location of a genotype-dependent cholinergic mechanism controlling exploratory behaviour in mice].

Authors:  J H van Abeelen; A J Smits; W G Raaijmakers
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1971

Review 9.  Nonassociative explanations of behavioral changes induced by central cholinergic drugs.

Authors:  G Bignami
Journal:  Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.579

10.  Effects of d-amphetamine and scopolamine on activity before and after shock in three mouse strains.

Authors:  H Anisman; D Wahlsten; L Kokkinidis
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1975 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.533

View more
  6 in total

1.  Strain differences in amphetamine sensitivity in mice. I. A diallel analysis of open field activity.

Authors:  K Kitahama; J L Valatx
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  A method of quantitating aggressive behaviour revealing possible dissociation of motor activity and aggression.

Authors:  A C Matte
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979-02-28       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Strain differences in amphetamine sensitivity in mice. II. Overcompensation of paradoxical sleep after deprivation in two C57 strains.

Authors:  K Kitahama; J L Valatx
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Amphetamine does not affect the partial punishment effect (PPE).

Authors:  I Weiner; H Bercovitz; J Feldon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Inbred rat strain comparisons indicate different sites of action for cocaine and amphetamine locomotor stimulant effects.

Authors:  F R George; L J Porrino; M C Ritz; S R Goldberg
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Genetics of adverse reactions to haloperidol in a mouse diallel: a drug-placebo experiment and Bayesian causal analysis.

Authors:  James J Crowley; Yunjung Kim; Alan B Lenarcic; Corey R Quackenbush; Cordelia J Barrick; Daniel E Adkins; Ginger S Shaw; Darla R Miller; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena; Patrick F Sullivan; William Valdar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.562

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.