Literature DB >> 30805956

Rethinking interhemispheric imbalance as a target for stroke neurorehabilitation.

Jing Xu1, Meret Branscheidt2,3, Heidi Schambra4,5, Levke Steiner3, Mario Widmer3, Jörn Diedrichsen6,7, Jeff Goldsmith8, Martin Lindquist9, Tomoko Kitago4,10, Andreas R Luft3, John W Krakauer1,2,11, Pablo A Celnik2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients with chronic stroke have been shown to have failure to release interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) from the intact to the damaged hemisphere before movement execution (premovement IHI). This inhibitory imbalance was found to correlate with poor motor performance in the chronic stage after stroke and has since become a target for therapeutic interventions. The logic of this approach, however, implies that abnormal premovement IHI is causal to poor behavioral outcome and should therefore be present early after stroke when motor impairment is at its worst. To test this idea, in a longitudinal study, we investigated interhemispheric interactions by tracking patients' premovement IHI for one year following stroke.
METHODS: We assessed premovement IHI and motor behavior five times over a 1-year period after ischemic stroke in 22 patients and 11 healthy participants.
RESULTS: We found that premovement IHI was normal during the acute/subacute period and only became abnormal at the chronic stage; specifically, release of IHI in movement preparation worsened as motor behavior improved. In addition, premovement IHI did not correlate with behavioral measures cross-sectionally, whereas the longitudinal emergence of abnormal premovement IHI from the acute to the chronic stage was inversely correlated with recovery of finger individuation.
INTERPRETATION: These results suggest that interhemispheric imbalance is not a cause of poor motor recovery, but instead might be the consequence of underlying recovery processes. These findings call into question the rehabilitation strategy of attempting to rebalance interhemispheric interactions in order to improve motor recovery after stroke. Ann Neurol 2019;85:502-513.
© 2019 American Neurological Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30805956     DOI: 10.1002/ana.25452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  23 in total

1.  Stratifying chronic stroke patients based on the influence of contralesional motor cortices: An inter-hemispheric inhibition study.

Authors:  Yin-Liang Lin; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; David A Cunningham; Manshi Li; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; John Lee; Stephen Jones; Ken Sakaie; Xiaofeng Wang; Andre G Machado; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  β-Oscillations Reflect Recovery of the Paretic Upper Limb in Subacute Stroke.

Authors:  Chih-Wei Tang; Fu-Jung Hsiao; Po-Lei Lee; Yun-An Tsai; Ya-Fang Hsu; Wei-Ta Chen; Yung-Yang Lin; Charlotte J Stagg; I-Hui Lee
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  The effects of five sessions of continuous theta burst stimulation over contralesional sensorimotor cortex paired with paretic skilled motor practice in people with chronic stroke.

Authors:  J L Neva; K E Brown; K P Wadden; C S Mang; M R Borich; S K Meehan; L A Boyd
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.406

4.  Ipsilateral Motor Pathways and Transcallosal Inhibition During Lower Limb Movement After Stroke.

Authors:  Brice T Cleland; Sangeetha Madhavan
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 5.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Pediatric Neurological Disorders.

Authors:  Laura A Malone; Lisa R Sun
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 6.  The Cortical Physiology of Ipsilateral Limb Movements.

Authors:  David T Bundy; Eric C Leuthardt
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 13.837

7.  Spatially bivariate EEG-neurofeedback can manipulate interhemispheric inhibition.

Authors:  Masaaki Hayashi; Kohei Okuyama; Nobuaki Mizuguchi; Ryotaro Hirose; Taisuke Okamoto; Michiyuki Kawakami; Junichi Ushiba
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 8.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Upper Extremity Motor Recovery: Does It Help?

Authors:  Heidi M Schambra
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.081

9.  Neurophysiological signatures of hand motor response to dual-transcranial direct current stimulation in subacute stroke: a TMS and MEG study.

Authors:  I-Ju Kuo; Chih-Wei Tang; Yun-An Tsai; Shuen-Chang Tang; Chun-Jen Lin; Shih-Pin Hsu; Wei-Kuang Liang; Chi-Hung Juan; Catharina Zich; Charlotte J Stagg; I-Hui Lee
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 10.  Neurostimulation and Reach-to-Grasp Function Recovery Following Acquired Brain Injury: Insight From Pre-clinical Rodent Models and Human Applications.

Authors:  Charles-Francois V Latchoumane; Deborah A Barany; Lohitash Karumbaiah; Tarkeshwar Singh
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.