Literature DB >> 18581339

3D nongadolinium-enhanced ECG-gated MRA of the distal lower extremities: preliminary clinical experience.

Ruth P Lim1, Elizabeth M Hecht, Jian Xu, James S Babb, Niels Oesingmann, Samson Wong, Bart E Muhs, Paul Gagne, Vivian S Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report our initial experience implementing a noncontrast-enhanced electrocardiograph (ECG) gated fast spin echo magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) technique for assessment of the calf arteries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Noncontrast MRA images of 36 clinical patients examined over a 6-month period were evaluated by two radiologists for length and degree of stenosis of arterial segments. Diagnostic confidence in the technique was also recorded. The reference standard was a consensus reading by both radiologists using the noncontrast technique combined with two gadolinium-enhanced techniques: bolus-chase and time-resolved imaging.
RESULTS: For stenosis evaluation the noncontrast technique demonstrated accuracy 79.4% (1083/1364), sensitivity 85.4% (437/512), and specificity 75.8% (646/852). The sequence demonstrated high negative predictive value (92.3%, 646/700). The technique had serious artifacts leading to poor diagnostic confidence in 17 patients (47.2%). These included motion (n = 7) and artifacts specific to the sequence, including inaccurate trigger delays (n = 5), linear artifact (n = 7), and vessel blurring (n = 5). When only patients in whom there was satisfactory diagnostic confidence were considered, accuracy, sensitivity, and negative predictive value were 92.2% (661/717), 92.4% (158/171), and 97.5% (503/516), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that when technically successful, noncontrast-enhanced MRA using ECG-gated fast spin echo can provide accurate imaging of the calf and pedal arteries. However, further development and optimization are needed to improve the robustness of the technique. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18581339     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  32 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the calf station at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparison of non-enhanced ECG-gated flow-dependent MRA, continuous table movement MRA and time-resolved MRA.

Authors:  Stefan Haneder; Ulrike I Attenberger; Philipp Riffel; Thomas Henzler; Stefan O Schoenberg; Henrik J Michaely
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Unenhanced calf MR angiography at 3.0 T using electrocardiography-gated partial-fourier fast spin echo imaging with variable flip angle.

Authors:  Dan Li; Jiang Lin; Fuhua Yan; Qingyuan Wu; Weiwei Lv; Yan San; Hong Yun
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Non-enhanced, ECG-gated MR angiography of the pedal vasculature: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

Authors:  Tilman Schubert; Martin Takes; Markus Aschwanden; Markus Klarhoefer; Tanja Haas; Augustinus L Jacob; David Liu; Andreas Gutzeit; Sebastian Kos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Nonenhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the calf arteries at 3 Tesla: intraindividual comparison of 3D flow-dependent subtractive MRA and 2D flow-independent non-subtractive MRA.

Authors:  Gesine Knobloch; Marie-Teres Lauff; Sebastian Hirsch; Carsten Schwenke; Bernd Hamm; Moritz Wagner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography in critical limb ischemia: performance of quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) and TSE-based subtraction techniques.

Authors:  Mustafa A Altaha; Jeffrey D Jaskolka; Kongteng Tan; Manuela Rick; Peter Schmitt; Ravi J Menezes; Bernd J Wintersperger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Three-dimensional electrocardiographically gated variable flip angle FSE imaging for MR angiography of the hands at 3.0 T: initial experience.

Authors:  Ruth P Lim; Pippa Storey; Iliyana P Atanasova; Jian Xu; Elizabeth M Hecht; James S Babb; David R Stoffel; Hugo Chang; Kellyanne McGorty; Qun Chen; Henry Rusinek; H Michael Belmont; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Noncontrast MR angiography: An update.

Authors:  Robert R Edelman; Ioannis Koktzoglou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  State-of-the-art MRI techniques in neuroradiology: principles, pitfalls, and clinical applications.

Authors:  Magalie Viallon; Victor Cuvinciuc; Benedicte Delattre; Laura Merlini; Isabelle Barnaure-Nachbar; Seema Toso-Patel; Minerva Becker; Karl-Olof Lovblad; Sven Haller
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Modified calcium subtraction in dual-energy CT angiography of the lower extremity runoff: impact on diagnostic accuracy for stenosis detection.

Authors:  Domenico De Santis; Carlo N De Cecco; U Joseph Schoepf; John W Nance; Ricardo T Yamada; Brooke A Thomas; Katharina Otani; Brian E Jacobs; D Alan Turner; Julian L Wichmann; Marwen Eid; Akos Varga-Szemes; Damiano Caruso; Katharine L Grant; Bernhard Schmidt; Thomas J Vogl; Andrea Laghi; Moritz H Albrecht
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  ECG-triggered non-enhanced MR angiography of peripheral arteries in comparison to DSA in patients with peripheral artery occlusive disease.

Authors:  Sasan Partovi; Matthias Rasmus; Anja-Carina Schulte; Fabian Rengier; Augustinus Ludwig Jacob; Markus Aschwanden; Christof Karmonik; Geog Bongartz; Deniz Bilecen
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.