| Literature DB >> 30804230 |
Ting Dong1, Wen-Ming Yang2, Ming-Cai Wu3, Juan Zhang2, Peng Huang2, Chun-Sheng Xu4, An-Qin Wang4, Chun-Jun Kuang2, Zhi-Ling Gao5.
Abstract
Purpose: Wilson's disease (WD) is a genetic disorder of copper metabolism with pathological copper accumulation in the brain. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between the damaged white matter and the impaired cognitive function in WD patients. Materials and methods: Thirty WD adolescents and thirty age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HC) were enrolled. All subjects had received brain MRI, including conventional and diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) scans. The DTI parameter of fractional anisotropy (FA) was calculated by diffusion kurtosis estimator software. The t test was used to compare the differences between two groups. The correlation between cognitive function and whiter matter disorders were analyzed by linear regression. The results of FA parameter and MD parameter intergroup analysis were both corrected with False Discovery Rate (FDR) simulations by SPSS.Entities:
Keywords: Wilson’s disease; adolescent; cognitive impairment; fractional anisotropy
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30804230 PMCID: PMC6418401 DOI: 10.1042/BSR20181651
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosci Rep ISSN: 0144-8463 Impact factor: 3.840
Characteristics of two groups of participants
| Control ( | WD ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 16.97 ± 1.16 | 16.90 ± 2.04 | 0.877 | |
| 15 (50%)/15 (50%) | 15 (50%)/15 (50%) | 1.000 | |
| 8 (8–8) | 8 (8–8) | 1.000 | |
| - | 2.64 ± 0.88 | - |
Comparison of cognitive function between WD and HC groups
| Control ( | WD ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 (5–6) | 5 (5–6) | 0.350 | |
| 6 (5.75–6) | 3 (2–4) | <0.001 | |
| 28 (28–29) | 28 (27–28) | 0.069 | |
| 7 (6.75–8) | 7 (5.75–8) | 0.195 | |
| 9 (8–9) | 8 (7–9) | 0.019 |
Comparison of the FA in different brain areas between WD and HC groups
| Areas | Control ( | WD ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.137 ± 0.020 | 0.200 ± 0.048 | <0.001 | |
| 0.132 ± 0.011 | 0.194 ± 0.044 | <0.001 | |
| 0.132 ± 0.014 | 0.199 ± 0.055 | <0.001 | |
| 0.130 ± 0.011 | 0.194 ± 0.047 | <0.001 | |
| 0.200 ± 0.037 | 0.126 ± 0.024 | <0.001 | |
| 0.292 ± 0.018 | 0.352 ± 0.053 | <0.001 | |
| 0.282 ± 0.060 | 0.210 ± 0.042 | <0.001 |
Figure 1FA parameter differences of brain regions between patients and controls (FDR simulation, P=0.001, α = 0.05, cluster size = 326)
Compared with the HC, patients showed increased FA in in bilateral thalamus, bilateral lentiform nucleus, and decreased FA in right cerebellum and cingulum, and left middle frontal lobe.
Correlation of FA and cognitive function in HC group
| EBPM | TBPM | MMSE | DS | VFT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.134 | −0.168 | −0.079 | −0.328 | 0.073 | |
| 0.079 | −0.077 | 0.163 | −0.183 | 0.099 | |
| −0.399 | −0.141 | 0.283 | −0.146 | 0.236 | |
| −0.291 | 0.023 | 0.287 | −0.083 | 0.138 | |
| -0.166 | −0.241 | −0.045 | −0.213 | 0.247 | |
| 0.312 | 0.059 | 0.144 | 0.106 | 0.000 | |
| 0.083 | −0.159 | −0.005 | 0.207 | 0.059 |
P=0.029.
Correlation of FA and cognitive function in WD group
| EBPM | TBPM | MMSE | DS | VFT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −0.211 | −0.102 | −0.213 | −0.424* | −0.111 | |
| −0.163 | −0.122 | 0.173 | −0.376* | −0.040 | |
| −0.424* | −0.285 | 0.220 | −0.421* | 0.103 | |
| −0.447* | −0.296 | 0.172 | −0.435* | 0.052 | |
| −0.490† | −0.510† | 0.081 | −0.590† | −0.408* | |
| −0.100 | −0.072 | −0.008 | −0.354 | −0.218 | |
| 0.067 | 0.223 | 0.003 | 0.110 | 0.116 |
*P<0.05.
†P<0.01.
Figure 2The correlation of FA and cognitive function in WD patients
The DS score and FA in the right thalamus (A), left thalamus (B), left lentiform nucleus (C) and right head of caudate nucleus (D); the FT score and FA in right head of caudate nucleus (E); the EBPM score and FA in left thalamus (F), left lentiform nucleus (G) and right head of caudate nucleus (H); the TBPM score and FA in right head of caudate nucleus (I).