Nicolaas I Bohnen1, Roger L Albin2, Martijn L T M Müller3, Myria Petrou3, Vikas Kotagal4, Robert A Koeppe3, Peter J H Scott3, Kirk A Frey5. 1. Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor2Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor3Neurology Service and Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Administration Ann Arbor H. 2. Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor3Neurology Service and Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Administration Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan4Michigan Alzheimer Disease Center, Ann Arbor. 3. Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 4. Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 5. Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor2Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Little is known about the relative contributions of multisystem degenerative processes across the spectrum of predemented cognitive decline in Parkinson disease (PD). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relative frequency of caudate nucleus dopaminergic and forebrain cholinergic deficits across a spectrum of cognitively impaired patients with PD to explore their relative, individual, and combined contributions to cognitive impairment in PD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study at an academic movement disorders clinic that included a predominantly nondemented cohort of 143 patients with PD. The mean (SD) age of patients was 65.5 (7.4) years and the mean (SD) Hoehn and Yahr stage was 2.4 (0.6). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Binary classification of carbon 11-labeled [11C]PMP acetylcholinesterase and caudate nucleus [11C]DTBZ monoaminergic positron-emission tomography imaging based on normative data. The frequency of significant degenerative processes based on normative values was determined for consecutive intervals of cognitive impairment, ranging from no or minimal (z > -0.5) to more severe (z ≤ -2) cognitive impairment. RESULTS: Across the spectrum from minimal (z > -0.5) to more severe (z ≤ -2) global cognitive impairment scores, caudate nucleus dopaminergic denervation was relatively frequent in individuals with minimal or no cognitive changes (51.1%) and increased in patients with more severe cognitive impairments (χ2 = 12.8; P = .01). Cortical cholinergic denervation frequency increased monotonically with increasing cognitive impairment from 24.7% (z > -0.5) to 85.7% (z ≤ -2); χ2 = 23.2; P = .001). Eighty-seven percent of patients with neocortical cholinergic deficits had caudate nucleus dopaminergic deficits. Multiple regression analysis (F = 7.51; P < .001) showed both independent cognitive predictions for caudate nucleus dopaminergic (F = 7.25; P = .008) and cortical cholinergic (F = 7.50; P = .007) degenerations as well as interaction effects (F = 5.40; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Cortical cholinergic denervation is a major neurodegeneration associated with progressive declines across the spectrum of cognitive impairment in PD and typically occurs in the context of significant caudate nucleus dopaminergic denervation. Our findings imply that dopaminergic and cholinergic degenerations exhibit both independent and interactive contributions to cognitive impairment in PD.
IMPORTANCE: Little is known about the relative contributions of multisystem degenerative processes across the spectrum of predemented cognitive decline in Parkinson disease (PD). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relative frequency of caudate nucleus dopaminergic and forebrain cholinergic deficits across a spectrum of cognitively impairedpatients with PD to explore their relative, individual, and combined contributions to cognitive impairment in PD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study at an academic movement disorders clinic that included a predominantly nondemented cohort of 143 patients with PD. The mean (SD) age of patients was 65.5 (7.4) years and the mean (SD) Hoehn and Yahr stage was 2.4 (0.6). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Binary classification of carbon 11-labeled [11C]PMPacetylcholinesterase and caudate nucleus [11C]DTBZ monoaminergic positron-emission tomography imaging based on normative data. The frequency of significant degenerative processes based on normative values was determined for consecutive intervals of cognitive impairment, ranging from no or minimal (z > -0.5) to more severe (z ≤ -2) cognitive impairment. RESULTS: Across the spectrum from minimal (z > -0.5) to more severe (z ≤ -2) global cognitive impairment scores, caudate nucleus dopaminergic denervation was relatively frequent in individuals with minimal or no cognitive changes (51.1%) and increased in patients with more severe cognitive impairments (χ2 = 12.8; P = .01). Cortical cholinergic denervation frequency increased monotonically with increasing cognitive impairment from 24.7% (z > -0.5) to 85.7% (z ≤ -2); χ2 = 23.2; P = .001). Eighty-seven percent of patients with neocortical cholinergic deficits had caudate nucleus dopaminergic deficits. Multiple regression analysis (F = 7.51; P < .001) showed both independent cognitive predictions for caudate nucleus dopaminergic (F = 7.25; P = .008) and cortical cholinergic (F = 7.50; P = .007) degenerations as well as interaction effects (F = 5.40; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Cortical cholinergic denervation is a major neurodegeneration associated with progressive declines across the spectrum of cognitive impairment in PD and typically occurs in the context of significant caudate nucleus dopaminergic denervation. Our findings imply that dopaminergic and cholinergic degenerations exhibit both independent and interactive contributions to cognitive impairment in PD.
Authors: Christopher G Goetz; Werner Poewe; Olivier Rascol; Cristina Sampaio; Glenn T Stebbins; Carl Counsell; Nir Giladi; Robert G Holloway; Charity G Moore; Gregor K Wenning; Melvin D Yahr; Lisa Seidl Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: R Hilker; A V Thomas; J C Klein; S Weisenbach; E Kalbe; L Burghaus; A H Jacobs; K Herholz; W D Heiss Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-12-13 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Myria Petrou; Kirk A Frey; Michael R Kilbourn; Peter J H Scott; David M Raffel; Nicolaas I Bohnen; Martijn L T M Müller; Roger L Albin; Robert A Koeppe Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2014-01-30 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: S Nagatsuka Si; K Fukushi; H Shinotoh; H Namba; M Iyo; N Tanaka; A Aotsuka; T Ota; S Tanada; T Irie Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Sudhakar R Subramaniam; Iddo Magen; Nicholas Bove; Chunni Zhu; Vincent Lemesre; Garima Dutta; Chris Jean Elias; Henry A Lester; Marie-Francoise Chesselet Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2018-06-01 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: W Alex Dalrymple; Diane S Huss; Jamie Blair; Joseph L Flanigan; James Patrie; Scott A Sperling; Binit B Shah; Madaline B Harrison; T Jason Druzgal; Matthew J Barrett Journal: J Neurol Date: 2020-07-28 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Jared J Tanner; Shellie-Anne Levy; Nadine A Schwab; Loren P Hizel; Peter T Nguyen; Michael S Okun; Catherine C Price Journal: Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: Jeffrey L B Bohnen; Martijn L T M Müller; Jacob Haugen; Nicolaas I Bohnen Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Neha Shah; Kirk A Frey; Martijn L T M Müller; Myria Petrou; Vikas Kotagal; Robert A Koeppe; Peter J H Scott; Roger L Albin; Nicolaas I Bohnen Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2015-09-18 Impact factor: 10.338