Literature DB >> 30803035

Influence of residual bone height and sinus width on the outcome of maxillary sinus bone augmentation using anorganic bovine bone.

Túlio Bonna Pignaton1,2, Ann Wenzel2, Carlos Eduardo de Almeida Ferreira3, Carolina Borges Martinelli3, Guilherme J P L Oliveira1, Elcio Marcantonio1, Rubens Spin-Neto2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of the posterior residual bone height and sinus width on the outcome of maxillary sinus bone augmentation using anorganic bovine bone.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Bilateral sinus bone augmentation was performed using anorganic bovine bone in 20 patients with residual bone height <2 mm in at least one site on each side. Trephine samples were removed at the implant insertion site 8 months after the grafting procedure, and histological and histomorphometric analyses were performed to examine the relative amount (%) of new bone, anorganic bovine bone, and soft tissue in the grafted area. Based on cone beam computed tomography evaluation, the sites of implant insertion were classified according to sinus width into narrow, average, and wide, and according to residual bone height into ≤2 and >2 mm.
RESULTS: A total of 146 implants were installed and 103 biopsies were evaluated. New bone formation in sites classified as narrow (69 sites), average (19 sites), and wide (15 sites) was 28.5% ± 9.24, 28.9% ± 8.61, and 30.3% ± 7.80, respectively. The mean posterior maxillary residual bone height was 4.0 ± 2.43 mm, and 26 and 77 sites were classified as ≤2 and >2 mm, respectively. New bone formation was 26.2% ± 9.10 and 29.8% ± 8.67 for residual bone height ≤2 and >2 mm, respectively. The differences were non-significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present study, posterior residual bone height and sinus width were not factors with influence on new bone formation in sinuses grafted exclusively with anorganic bovine bone after 8 months of healing.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone formation; bone substitutes; clinical trial; sinus floor augmentation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30803035     DOI: 10.1111/clr.13417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  7 in total

1.  The effect of anatomy on osteogenesis after maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a radiographic and histological analysis.

Authors:  Wenjie Zhou; Feng Wang; Marko Magic; Minjie Zhuang; Jian Sun; Yiqun Wu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Evaluation of volume changes following lateral window maxillary sinus floor elevation using Minics software.

Authors:  Hanfei Zhang; Huiting Hu; Cong Li; Yingxin Ye; Mingdeng Rong; Yong Yang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-09

3.  The Influence of Residual Alveolar Bone Height on Graft Composition after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Two Different Xenografts: A Histomorphometric Comparative Study.

Authors:  Silvio Taschieri; Moses Ofer; Stefano Corbella; Tiziano Testori; Claudia Dellavia; Carlos Nemcovsky; Elena Canciani; Luca Francetti; Massimo Del Fabbro; Gianluca Tartaglia
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.623

4.  The vertical course of bone regeneration in maxillary sinus floor augmentations: A histomorphometric analysis of human biopsies.

Authors:  Florian Beck; Karoline Maria Reich; Stefan Lettner; Patrick Heimel; Stefan Tangl; Heinz Redl; Christian Ulm
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 5.  Innovative Concepts and Recent Breakthrough for Engineered Graft and Constructs for Bone Regeneration: A Literature Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francesco Inchingolo; Denisa Hazballa; Alessio Danilo Inchingolo; Giuseppina Malcangi; Grazia Marinelli; Antonio Mancini; Maria Elena Maggiore; Ioana Roxana Bordea; Antonio Scarano; Marco Farronato; Gianluca Martino Tartaglia; Felice Lorusso; Angelo Michele Inchingolo; Gianna Dipalma
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Does new bone formation vary in different sites within the same maxillary sinus after lateral augmentation? A prospective histomorphometric study.

Authors:  Claudio Stacchi; Antonio Rapani; Teresa Lombardi; Fabio Bernardello; Vanessa Nicolin; Federico Berton
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 5.021

7.  Digital Workflow for the Design, Manufacture, and Application of Custom-Made Short Implants With Wing Retention Device.

Authors:  Zexian Xu; Zhen Yang; Jianjun Yang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.