Literature DB >> 30793489

Adaptive evolution of butterfly wing shape: from morphology to behaviour.

Camille Le Roy1,2, Vincent Debat1, Violaine Llaurens1.   

Abstract

Butterflies display extreme variation in wing shape associated with tremendous ecological diversity. Disentangling the role of neutral versus adaptive processes in wing shape diversification remains a challenge for evolutionary biologists. Ascertaining how natural selection influences wing shape evolution requires both functional studies linking morphology to flight performance, and ecological investigations linking performance in the wild with fitness. However, direct links between morphological variation and fitness have rarely been established. The functional morphology of butterfly flight has been investigated but selective forces acting on flight behaviour and associated wing shape have received less attention. Here, we attempt to estimate the ecological relevance of morpho-functional links established through biomechanical studies in order to understand the evolution of butterfly wing morphology. We survey the evidence for natural and sexual selection driving wing shape evolution in butterflies, and discuss how our functional knowledge may allow identification of the selective forces involved, at both the macro- and micro-evolutionary scales. Our review shows that although correlations between wing shape variation and ecological factors have been established at the macro-evolutionary level, the underlying selective pressures often remain unclear. We identify the need to investigate flight behaviour in relevant ecological contexts to detect variation in fitness-related traits. Identifying the selective regime then should guide experimental studies towards the relevant estimates of flight performance. Habitat, predators and sex-specific behaviours are likely to be major selective forces acting on wing shape evolution in butterflies. Some striking cases of morphological divergence driven by contrasting ecology involve both wing and body morphology, indicating that their interactions should be included in future studies investigating co-evolution between morphology and flight behaviour.
© 2019 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Keywords:  Lepidoptera; aerodynamic performance; coevolution; diversification; fitness; flight behaviour; wing morphology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30793489     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  14 in total

1.  Forest stratification shapes allometry and flight morphology of tropical butterflies.

Authors:  Sebastián Mena; Krzysztof M Kozak; Rafael E Cárdenas; María F Checa
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Two centuries of monarch butterfly collections reveal contrasting effects of range expansion and migration loss on wing traits.

Authors:  Micah G Freedman; Hugh Dingle; Sharon Y Strauss; Santiago R Ramírez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The reverse flight of a monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) is characterized by a weight-supporting upstroke and postural changes.

Authors:  Ayodeji T Bode-Oke; Haibo Dong
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  The evolution of two distinct strategies of moth flight.

Authors:  Brett R Aiello; Usama Bin Sikandar; Hajime Minoguchi; Burhanuddin Bhinderwala; Chris A Hamilton; Akito Y Kawahara; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Condition dependence in biosynthesized chemical defenses of an aposematic and mimetic Heliconius butterfly.

Authors:  Anniina L K Mattila; Chris D Jiggins; Marjo Saastamoinen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.167

6.  Adaptive shifts underlie the divergence in wing morphology in bombycoid moths.

Authors:  Brett R Aiello; Milton Tan; Usama Bin Sikandar; Alexis J Alvey; Burhanuddin Bhinderwala; Katalina C Kimball; Jesse R Barber; Chris A Hamilton; Akito Y Kawahara; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.530

7.  Morphological diversification has led to inter-specific variation in elastic wing deformation during flight in scarab beetles.

Authors:  Y Meresman; J F Husak; R Ben-Shlomo; G Ribak
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Altitude and life-history shape the evolution of Heliconius wings.

Authors:  Gabriela Montejo-Kovacevich; Jennifer E Smith; Joana I Meier; Caroline N Bacquet; Eva Whiltshire-Romero; Nicola J Nadeau; Chris D Jiggins
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Butterflies fly using efficient propulsive clap mechanism owing to flexible wings.

Authors:  L C Johansson; P Henningsson
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Disentangling the Impacts of Speciation, Sympatry and the Island Effect on the Morphology of Seven Hynobius sp. Salamanders.

Authors:  Amaël Borzée; Mi-Sook Min
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.