Literature DB >> 30790566

A contemporary amniotic fluid volume chart for the United States: The NICHD Fetal Growth Studies-Singletons.

John Owen1, Paul S Albert2, Germaine M Buck Louis2, Karin M Fuchs3, William A Grobman4, Sungduk Kim2, Mary E D'Alton3, Ronald Wapner3, Deborah A Wing5, Katherine L Grantz2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Amniotic fluid is essential to normal fetal development and is estimated clinically with ultrasound scanning to identify pregnancies that are at risk for poor perinatal outcome.
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to develop a United States standard for amniotic fluid volume that is estimated by the amniotic fluid index and single deepest pocket. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter observational study of 2334 low-risk women with normal singleton gestations from 1 of 4 self-reported racial/ethnic groups. Eligible women had confirmed first-trimester dating criteria with health status, lifestyles, and medical and obstetric histories that were associated with normal fetal growth. Consenting women underwent serial (up to 5) sonographic evaluations of amniotic fluid between 15 and 40 weeks of gestation after being assigned randomly to 1 of 4 gestational age observation schedules. Twelve United States perinatal centers participated, and all sonograms were performed by credentialed sonographers who used identical, high-resolution equipment; caregivers were unaware of results but were notified for oligohydramnios. Women (n=597) who were subsequently found to have clinically significant antepartum complications were excluded. Racial/ethnic-specific nomograms for amniotic fluid index and single deepest pocket across gestation were developed with the use of linear mixed models with cubic splines; racial/ethnic differences were evaluated both with global and between-group tests. Median, 3rd, 5th, 10th, 90th, 95th and 97th percentile values were also estimated. We further considered the possible confounding effects of selected maternal characteristics and the estimated fetal weight at each sonogram.
RESULTS: A total of 1719 pregnant women met inclusion criteria and had available data. These included 480 non-Hispanic white women, 418 non-Hispanic black women, 485 Hispanic women, and 336 Asian women. Both the amniotic fluid index and the single deepest pocket varied across gestation with maximal values at 26 and 33 weeks of gestation, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed by maternal race/ethnicity. The between-group differences that were observed at 17-22 and 35-40 weeks of gestation remained statistically significant after adjustment for maternal characteristics and estimated fetal weight. These between-group racial/ethnic differences were most prominent after 35 weeks of gestation and at the extremes of dispersion (3rd and 97th percentiles). All 3rd and 97th percentile amniotic fluid index values were within the range of commonly used cutoffs to define oligohydramnios (≤5 cm) and polyhydramnios (≥25 cm). However, the 3rd percentile values ranged between 5.9 cm at 40 weeks of gestation and 10.1 cm at 25-27 weeks of gestation; the 97th percentile values ranged between 24.8 cm at 38 weeks of gestation and 15.7 cm at 15 weeks of gestation.
CONCLUSION: Sonographic amniotic fluid volume estimates vary by racial/ethnic group, but the absolute differences appear to be small and may not be clinically significant. Selected maternal characteristics and estimated fetal weight did not affect the racial/ethnic differences. Between-group differences are maximal after 35 weeks of gestation and at the extremes of the upper and lower dispersion estimates. Given the observed variability in extreme (3rd and 97th percentile) dispersion values over the gestation, use of single cutoffs to define out-of-range measurements may not be appropriate clinically. These data might form a contemporary United States standard for amniotic fluid estimation that uses the amniotic fluid index and the single deepest pocket.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amniotic fluid index; estimated fetal weight; ethnic; fetal growth; low-risk; racial; single deepest pocket

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30790566      PMCID: PMC6592729          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  31 in total

1.  Modeling fetal weight for gestational age: a comparison of a flexible multi-level spline-based model with other approaches.

Authors:  Luc Villandré; Jennifer A Hutcheon; Maria Esther Perez Trejo; Haim Abenhaim; Geir Jacobsen; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 0.968

2.  Unconditional reference values for the amniotic fluid index measurement between 26w0d and 41w6d of gestation in low-risk pregnancies.

Authors:  Alberto Borges Peixoto; Taciana Mara Rodrigues da Cunha Caldas; Wellington P Martins; Fabricio Da Silva Costa; Edward Araujo Júnior
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2015-12-23

3.  Curve of amniotic fluid index measurements in low-risk pregnancy.

Authors:  Maria Regina Machado; Jose Guilherme Cecatti; Fabiana Krupa; Anibal Faundes
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  Amniotic fluid index measurement with the four-quadrant technique during pregnancy.

Authors:  C J Jeng; T J Jou; K G Wang; Y C Yang; Y N Lee; C C Lan
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 0.142

5.  Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology.

Authors:  D G Altman; L S Chitty
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1994-01

6.  Longitudinal assessment of amniotic fluid index.

Authors:  E C Nwosu; C R Welch; P R Manasse; S A Walkinshaw
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1993-09

7.  Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study.

Authors:  F P Hadlock; R B Harrist; R S Sharman; R L Deter; S K Park
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-02-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Influence of parity on fetal hemodynamics and amniotic fluid volume at term.

Authors:  T Prior; E Mullins; P Bennett; S Kumar
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 7.299

9.  Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls.

Authors:  Jonathan A C Sterne; Ian R White; John B Carlin; Michael Spratt; Patrick Royston; Michael G Kenward; Angela M Wood; James R Carpenter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-29

10.  Racial/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Jagteshwar Grewal; Paul S Albert; Anthony Sciscione; Deborah A Wing; William A Grobman; Roger B Newman; Ronald Wapner; Mary E D'Alton; Daniel Skupski; Michael P Nageotte; Angela C Ranzini; John Owen; Edward K Chien; Sabrina Craigo; Mary L Hediger; Sungduk Kim; Cuilin Zhang; Katherine L Grantz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  3 in total

1.  What is the Impact of Abnormal Amniotic Fluid Volumes on Perinatal Outcomes in Normal Compared with At-Risk Pregnancies?

Authors:  Pamela M Simmons; Julie R Whittington; Sarah M Estrada; Songthip T Ounpraseuth; Kelsey L Shnaekel; Kala B Slaton; Everett F Magann
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2020-10-09

2.  Amniotic Fluid Volume Estimation from 20 Weeks to 28 Weeks. Do You Measure Perpendicular to the Floor or Perpendicular to the Uterine Contour?

Authors:  Dawn Hughes; Brianna Simmons; Everett Magann; Michael Wendel; Julie R Whittington; Songthip Ounpraseuth
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2021-11-25

3.  Fetal left ventricular modified myocardial performance index and renal artery pulsatility index in pregnancies with isolated oligohydramnios before 37 weeks of gestation

Authors:  Rıza Madazlı; Hakan Erenel; Ayşegül Özel; Funda Öztunç
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2020-06-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.