Literature DB >> 21931571

Modeling fetal weight for gestational age: a comparison of a flexible multi-level spline-based model with other approaches.

Luc Villandré1, Jennifer A Hutcheon, Maria Esther Perez Trejo, Haim Abenhaim, Geir Jacobsen, Robert W Platt.   

Abstract

We present a model for longitudinal measures of fetal weight as a function of gestational age. We use a linear mixed model, with a Box-Cox transformation of fetal weight values, and restricted cubic splines, in order to flexibly but parsimoniously model median fetal weight. We systematically compare our model to other proposed approaches. All proposed methods are shown to yield similar median estimates, as evidenced by overlapping pointwise confidence bands, except after 40 completed weeks, where our method seems to produce estimates more consistent with observed data. Sex-based stratification affects the estimates of the random effects variance-covariance structure, without significantly changing sex-specific fitted median values. We illustrate the benefits of including sex-gestational age interaction terms in the model over stratification. The comparison leads to the conclusion that the selection of a model for fetal weight for gestational age can be based on the specific goals and configuration of a given study without affecting the precision or value of median estimates for most gestational ages of interest.

Keywords:  fetal growth; multi-level models; small for gestational age

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21931571      PMCID: PMC3173606          DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biostat        ISSN: 1557-4679            Impact factor:   0.968


  30 in total

1.  Birthweight by gestational age in Norway.

Authors:  R Skjaerven; H K Gjessing; L S Bakketeig
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  A model for foetal growth and diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction.

Authors:  Peter M Hooper; Damon C Mayes; Nestor N Demianczuk
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Comparison of fetal growth estimates based on birth weight and ultrasound references.

Authors:  A G Fry; I M Bernstein; G J Badger
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2002-10

4.  Sex-specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15-40 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  P Schwärzler; J M Bland; D Holden; S Campbell; Y Ville
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard.

Authors:  F P Hadlock; R B Harrist; J Martinez-Poyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Sonographic estimation of fetal weight. The value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements.

Authors:  F P Hadlock; R B Harrist; R J Carpenter; R L Deter; S K Park
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Serum folate and fetal growth retardation: a matter of compliance?

Authors:  R L Goldenberg; T Tamura; S P Cliver; G R Cutter; H J Hoffman; R L Copper
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood.

Authors:  T J Cole; P J Green
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 9.  Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Mario Merialdi; Lawrence D Platt; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  A hypothetical model suggesting suboptimal intrauterine growth in infants delivered preterm.

Authors:  C P Weiner; R E Sabbagha; N Vaisrub; R Depp
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  2 in total

1.  Predicting large fetuses at birth: do multiple ultrasound examinations and longitudinal statistical modelling improve prediction?

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Sungduk Kim; Jagteshwar Grewal; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.980

2.  A contemporary amniotic fluid volume chart for the United States: The NICHD Fetal Growth Studies-Singletons.

Authors:  John Owen; Paul S Albert; Germaine M Buck Louis; Karin M Fuchs; William A Grobman; Sungduk Kim; Mary E D'Alton; Ronald Wapner; Deborah A Wing; Katherine L Grantz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 8.661

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.