Pieter Martens1,2, Dieter Nuyens3, Maximo Rivero-Ayerza3, Hugo Van Herendael3, Jan Vercammen3, Wendy Ceyssens3, Evert Luwel3, Matthias Dupont3, Wilfried Mullens3,4. 1. Department of Cardiology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600, Genk, Belgium. pieter.martens2@zol.be. 2. Doctoral School for Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium. pieter.martens2@zol.be. 3. Department of Cardiology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600, Genk, Belgium. 4. Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sacubitril/valsartan reduced the occurrence of sudden cardiac death in the PARADIGM-HF trial. However, limited information is available about the mechanism. METHODS: Heart failure (HF)-patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan for a class-I indication equipped with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with remote tele-monitoring were retrospectively analyzed. Device-registered arrhythmic-events were determined [ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF), appropriate therapy, non-sustained VT (NsVT; > 4beats and < 30 s), hourly premature ventricular contraction (PVC)-burden], following sacubitril/valsartan initiation (incident-analysis) and over an equal time period before initiation (antecedent-analysis). Reverse remodeling to sacubitril/valsartan was defined as an improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥ 5% between baseline and follow-up. RESULTS: A-total of 151 HF-patients with reduced LVEF (29 ± 9%) were included. Patients were switched from ACE-I or ARB to equal doses of sacubitril/valsartan (expressed as %-target-dose; before = 58 ± 30% vs. after = 56 ± 27%). The mean follow-up of both the incident and antecedent analysis was 364 days. Following the initiation, VT/VF-burden dropped (individual patients with VT/VF pre_n = 19 vs. post_n = 10, total-episodes of VT/VF pre_n = 51 vs. post_n = 14, both p < 0.001), resulting in reduced occurrence of appropriate therapy (pre_n = 16 vs. post_n = 6; p < 0.001). NsVT-burden per patient also dropped (mean episodes pre_n = 7.7 ± 11.8 vs. post_n = 3.7 ± 5.4; p < 0.001). There was no impact on atrial-fibrillation burden. PVC-burden dropped significantly which was associated with an improvement in BiV-pacing in patients with < 90% BiV-pacing at baseline. A higher degree of reverse remodeling was associated with a lower burden of NsVT and PVCs (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Initiation of sacubitril/valsartan is associated with a lower degree of VT/VF, resulting in less ICD-interventions. This beneficial effect on ventricular arrhythmias might be related to cardiac reverse remodeling.
BACKGROUND:Sacubitril/valsartan reduced the occurrence of sudden cardiac death in the PARADIGM-HF trial. However, limited information is available about the mechanism. METHODS:Heart failure (HF)-patients receiving sacubitril/valsartan for a class-I indication equipped with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with remote tele-monitoring were retrospectively analyzed. Device-registered arrhythmic-events were determined [ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF), appropriate therapy, non-sustained VT (NsVT; > 4beats and < 30 s), hourly premature ventricular contraction (PVC)-burden], following sacubitril/valsartan initiation (incident-analysis) and over an equal time period before initiation (antecedent-analysis). Reverse remodeling to sacubitril/valsartan was defined as an improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥ 5% between baseline and follow-up. RESULTS: A-total of 151 HF-patients with reduced LVEF (29 ± 9%) were included. Patients were switched from ACE-I or ARB to equal doses of sacubitril/valsartan (expressed as %-target-dose; before = 58 ± 30% vs. after = 56 ± 27%). The mean follow-up of both the incident and antecedent analysis was 364 days. Following the initiation, VT/VF-burden dropped (individual patients with VT/VF pre_n = 19 vs. post_n = 10, total-episodes of VT/VF pre_n = 51 vs. post_n = 14, both p < 0.001), resulting in reduced occurrence of appropriate therapy (pre_n = 16 vs. post_n = 6; p < 0.001). NsVT-burden per patient also dropped (mean episodes pre_n = 7.7 ± 11.8 vs. post_n = 3.7 ± 5.4; p < 0.001). There was no impact on atrial-fibrillation burden. PVC-burden dropped significantly which was associated with an improvement in BiV-pacing in patients with < 90% BiV-pacing at baseline. A higher degree of reverse remodeling was associated with a lower burden of NsVT and PVCs (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Initiation of sacubitril/valsartan is associated with a lower degree of VT/VF, resulting in less ICD-interventions. This beneficial effect on ventricular arrhythmias might be related to cardiac reverse remodeling.
Authors: Bruce L Wilkoff; Laurent Fauchier; Martin K Stiles; Carlos A Morillo; Sana M Al-Khatib; Jesús Almendral; Luis Aguinaga; Ronald D Berger; Alejandro Cuesta; James P Daubert; Sergio Dubner; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Guilherme Fenelon; Fermin C Garcia; Maurizio Gasparini; David E Haines; Jeff S Healey; Jodie L Hurtwitz; Roberto Keegan; Christof Kolb; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Germanas Marinskis; Martino Martinelli; Mark McGuire; Luis G Molina; Ken Okumura; Alessandro Proclemer; Andrea M Russo; Jagmeet P Singh; Charles D Swerdlow; Wee Siong Teo; William Uribe; Sami Viskin; Chun-Chieh Wang; Shu Zhang Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2015-12-01 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Michele Brignole; Angelo Auricchio; Gonzalo Baron-Esquivias; Pierre Bordachar; Giuseppe Boriani; Ole-A Breithardt; John Cleland; Jean-Claude Deharo; Victoria Delgado; Perry M Elliott; Bulent Gorenek; Carsten W Israel; Christophe Leclercq; Cecilia Linde; Lluís Mont; Luigi Padeletti; Richard Sutton; Panos E Vardas Journal: Europace Date: 2013-06-24 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Mina K Chung; Steven J Szymkiewicz; Mingyuan Shao; Edwin Zishiri; Mark J Niebauer; Bruce D Lindsay; Patrick J Tchou Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2010-07-13 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Junève Gracieux; Gillian D Sanders; Sean D Pokorney; Renato D Lopes; Kevin Thomas; Sana M Al-Khatib Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2014-10-05 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: John J V McMurray; Milton Packer; Akshay S Desai; Jianjian Gong; Martin P Lefkowitz; Adel R Rizkala; Jean L Rouleau; Victor C Shi; Scott D Solomon; Karl Swedberg; Michael R Zile Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-08-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Serge Boveda; Eloi Marijon; Sophie Jacob; Pascal Defaye; Jobst B Winter; Alan Bulava; Daniel Gras; Jean Paul Albenque; Nicolas Combes; Dominique Pavin; Nicolas Delarche; Alexander Teubl; Marie Lambiez; Philippe Chevalier Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2009-03-04 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Yehoshua C Levine; Michael A Rosenberg; Murray Mittleman; Michelle Samuel; Nilubon Methachittiphan; Mark Link; Mark E Josephson; Alfred E Buxton Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2014-05-13 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Piotr Ponikowski; Adriaan A Voors; Stefan D Anker; Héctor Bueno; John G F Cleland; Andrew J S Coats; Volkmar Falk; José Ramón González-Juanatey; Veli-Pekka Harjola; Ewa A Jankowska; Mariell Jessup; Cecilia Linde; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; John T Parissis; Burkert Pieske; Jillian P Riley; Giuseppe M C Rosano; Luis M Ruilope; Frank Ruschitzka; Frans H Rutten; Peter van der Meer Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Anders Jorsal; Kasper Pryds; John J V McMurray; Henrik Wiggers; Anders Sommer; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Roni Ranghøj Nielsen Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Roberto Ferrari; J Cardoso; M C Fonseca; C Aguiar; J I Moreira; A Fucili; C Rapezzi Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2019-09-17 Impact factor: 5.460