Ferhat Dindaş1, Hüseyin Güngör2, Mehmet Ekici3, Pınar Akokay4, Füsun Erhan5, Mustafa Doğduş1, Mehmet Birhan Yılmaz6. 1. Department of Cardiology, Uşak Training and Research Hospital; Uşak-Turkey. 2. Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary, Cumhuriyet University; Sivas-Turkey. 3. Department of Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary, Cumhuriyet University; Sivas-Turkey. 4. Department of Histology, İzmir Kavram Vocational School; İzmir-Turkey. 5. Department of Histology, Faculty of Veterinary, Cumhuriyet University; Sivas-Turkey. 6. Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylül University; İzmir-Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Doxorubicin (DOX) is a well-known cardiotoxic agent, whereas sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) is an effective treatment option in heart failure. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of Sac/Val on DOX-induced cardiotoxicity in pretreatment mice model. METHODS: A total of 24 mice were equally classified into 4 groups; control group, DOX (20 mg/kg; fifth day), Sac/Val (80 mg/kg), and Sac/Val+DOX (Sac/Val was given from day one of the study before doxorubicin administration). Electrocardiography parameters, including durations of QRS, ST, QT, PP segment, and QT/PQ index were measured. Total antioxidant status (TAS), total oxidant status (TOS), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin 1β (IL-1β), IL-6, NT-proBNP concentrations, and Caspase 3 activity were evaluated. RESULTS: At the end of the 9-day study duration, QRS, ST, QT intervals, QT/PQ index and TAS, TOS, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 levels were significantly higher in the DOX group than in the control group (p<0.001). Moreover, there were significant differences only in the PP interval when comparing the Sac/Val+DOX and control groups (p<0.001). QRS, ST, QT intervals, and QT/PQ index, TAS, TOS, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 levels were significantly lower in the Sac/Val+ DOX group compared with the DOX group (p<0.001). Furthermore, NT-proBNP levels were lower in the Sac/Val+DOX group compared with the DOX group along with less Caspase 3 apoptosis. CONCLUSION: Sac/Val seems to be cardioprotective against DOX-induced cardiotoxicity in pretreatment mice model. These findings can be attributed to the antiarrhythmic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antiapoptotic effects of Sac/Val as shown in this study.
OBJECTIVE: Doxorubicin (DOX) is a well-known cardiotoxic agent, whereas sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) is an effective treatment option in heart failure. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of Sac/Val on DOX-induced cardiotoxicity in pretreatment mice model. METHODS: A total of 24 mice were equally classified into 4 groups; control group, DOX (20 mg/kg; fifth day), Sac/Val (80 mg/kg), and Sac/Val+DOX (Sac/Val was given from day one of the study before doxorubicin administration). Electrocardiography parameters, including durations of QRS, ST, QT, PP segment, and QT/PQ index were measured. Total antioxidant status (TAS), total oxidant status (TOS), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin 1β (IL-1β), IL-6, NT-proBNP concentrations, and Caspase 3 activity were evaluated. RESULTS: At the end of the 9-day study duration, QRS, ST, QT intervals, QT/PQ index and TAS, TOS, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 levels were significantly higher in the DOX group than in the control group (p<0.001). Moreover, there were significant differences only in the PP interval when comparing the Sac/Val+DOX and control groups (p<0.001). QRS, ST, QT intervals, and QT/PQ index, TAS, TOS, TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 levels were significantly lower in the Sac/Val+ DOX group compared with the DOX group (p<0.001). Furthermore, NT-proBNP levels were lower in the Sac/Val+DOX group compared with the DOX group along with less Caspase 3 apoptosis. CONCLUSION: Sac/Val seems to be cardioprotective against DOX-induced cardiotoxicity in pretreatment mice model. These findings can be attributed to the antiarrhythmic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antiapoptotic effects of Sac/Val as shown in this study.
Authors: Carlos de Diego; Luis González-Torres; José María Núñez; Raúl Centurión Inda; David A Martin-Langerwerf; Antonio D Sangio; Piotr Chochowski; Pilar Casasnovas; Julio C Blazquéz; Jesús Almendral Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-11-14 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Gregory T Armstrong; Kevin C Oeffinger; Yan Chen; Toana Kawashima; Yutaka Yasui; Wendy Leisenring; Marilyn Stovall; Eric J Chow; Charles A Sklar; Daniel A Mulrooney; Ann C Mertens; William Border; Jean-Bernard Durand; Leslie L Robison; Lillian R Meacham Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J Ferlay; M Colombet; I Soerjomataram; C Mathers; D M Parkin; M Piñeros; A Znaor; F Bray Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2018-12-06 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Nor Hidayah Mustafa; Juriyati Jalil; Satirah Zainalabidin; Mohammed S M Saleh; Ahmad Yusof Asmadi; Yusof Kamisah Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2022-08-08 Impact factor: 5.988