Marquita S Gray1, Suzanne E Judd2, Richard Sloane3, Denise C Snyder4, Paige E Miller5, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried6. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics, UAB, Birmingham, AL, USA. 3. Center for Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. 4. Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA. 5. Cancer Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, TX, USA. 6. Department of Nutrition Sciences, UAB, Birmingham, AL, USA. demark@uab.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE:Rural cancer survivors (RCS) have poorer health outcomes and face multiple challenges-older age, and limited transportation, education, income, and healthcare access. Yet, RCS are understudied. The Reach-out to ENhancE Wellness(RENEW) trial, a home-based, diet and exercise intervention among 641 breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors addressed many of these challenges. METHODS: We examined whether rural and urban participants differed in their response to the RENEW intervention (e.g., physical functioning, quality-of-life, intakes of fruits and vegetables (F&V) and saturated fat, body mass index(BMI), physical activity, and adverse events). RESULTS: Rural versus urban survivors report significantly more favorable mean (SE) changes in physical functioning [- 0.66 (1.47) v - 1.71 (1.00)], physical health [+ 0.14 (0.71) v - 0.74 (0.50)], and fewer adverse events [1.58 (0.08) v 1.64 (0.06)]. Rural versus urban survivors reported smaller increases in F&Vs [+ 1.47 (0.23) v + 1.56(0.16); p = 0.018], and lower percentages achieved goal behavior for endurance exercise and intakes of F&Vs and saturated fat. CONCLUSIONS: The RENEW intervention reduced declines in physical health and functioning among RCS to a significantly greater extent than for urban cancer survivors. All survivors significantly improved intakes of F&V and saturated fat, and endurance exercise; however, lower percentages of rural versus urban survivors met goal suggesting that more intensive interventions may be needed for RCS.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Rural cancer survivors (RCS) have poorer health outcomes and face multiple challenges-older age, and limited transportation, education, income, and healthcare access. Yet, RCS are understudied. The Reach-out to ENhancE Wellness(RENEW) trial, a home-based, diet and exercise intervention among 641 breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors addressed many of these challenges. METHODS: We examined whether rural and urban participants differed in their response to the RENEW intervention (e.g., physical functioning, quality-of-life, intakes of fruits and vegetables (F&V) and saturated fat, body mass index(BMI), physical activity, and adverse events). RESULTS: Rural versus urban survivors report significantly more favorable mean (SE) changes in physical functioning [- 0.66 (1.47) v - 1.71 (1.00)], physical health [+ 0.14 (0.71) v - 0.74 (0.50)], and fewer adverse events [1.58 (0.08) v 1.64 (0.06)]. Rural versus urban survivors reported smaller increases in F&Vs [+ 1.47 (0.23) v + 1.56(0.16); p = 0.018], and lower percentages achieved goal behavior for endurance exercise and intakes of F&Vs and saturated fat. CONCLUSIONS: The RENEW intervention reduced declines in physical health and functioning among RCS to a significantly greater extent than for urban cancer survivors. All survivors significantly improved intakes of F&V and saturated fat, and endurance exercise; however, lower percentages of rural versus urban survivors met goal suggesting that more intensive interventions may be needed for RCS.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cancer survivors; Health disparities; Health outcomes; Lifestyle interventions; Rural
Authors: Jared P Reis; Heather R Bowles; Barbara E Ainsworth; Katrina D Dubose; Sharon Smith; James N Laditka Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Julie L Locher; Christine S Ritchie; David L Roth; Patricia Sawyer Baker; Eric V Bodner; Richard M Allman Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Smita Bhatia; Wendy Landier; Electra D Paskett; Katherine B Peters; Janette K Merrill; Jonathan Phillips; Raymond U Osarogiagbon Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Erin E Kent; Eliza M Park; William A Wood; Ashley Leak Bryant; Michelle A Mollica Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: Haiyan Qu; Richard Shewchuk; Xuejun Hu; Ana A Baumann; Michelle Y Martin; Maria Pisu; Robert A Oster; Laura Q Rogers Journal: Implement Sci Commun Date: 2020-11-04
Authors: Adriana M Coletta; Nathan B Rose; Austin F Johnson; D Scott Moxon; Stephen K Trapp; Darren Walker; Shelley White; Cornelia M Ulrich; Neeraj Agarwal; Sonal Oza; Rebecca W Zingg; Pamela A Hansen Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2021-01-27 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Tamar Ginossar; Heidi Rishel Brakey; Andrew L Sussman; Brittany Price; Miria Kano; Sally Davis; Cindy K Blair Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 3.390