Literature DB >> 15570145

Nonoccupational physical activity by degree of urbanization and U.S. geographic region.

Jared P Reis1, Heather R Bowles, Barbara E Ainsworth, Katrina D Dubose, Sharon Smith, James N Laditka.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate levels of nonoccupational leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) by degree of urbanization and geographic region of the United States.
METHODS: Participants were respondents to the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) in 2001 (N = 137,359). Moderate- and vigorous-intensity LTPA was categorized as meeting recommended levels, insufficient, or inactive. The U.S. Department of Agriculture rural-urban continuum codes were used to describe degrees of urbanization (metro, large urban, small urban, and rural). Geographic regions were defined by the U.S. Bureau of the Census (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West). Prevalence estimates were calculated using sample weights to account for the design of the BRFSS. Multivariate logistic regression analyses examined regional differences in the odds of physical inactivity (physically inactive vs insufficient or meets) by degree of urbanization after adjustment for sex, age, race, BMI, education, and occupational physical activity.
RESULTS: Large urban areas (49.0%) and the western United States (49.0%) had the highest prevalence of recommended levels of LTPA. Rural areas (24.1%) and the southern United States (17.4%) had the highest prevalence of inactivity. Adults living in the four urbanization categories of the midwestern (metro (OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.31, 1.65), large urban (OR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.51, 2.23), small urban (OR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.65, 2.40), and rural (OR = 2.59, 95% CI = 1.35, 4.97)); and southern (metro (OR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.53, 1.88), large urban (OR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.72, 2.41), small urban (OR = 2.32, 95% CI = 2.02, 2.67), and rural (OR = 5.49, 95% CI = 2.82, 10.68)) U.S. regions were more likely to be inactive than adults living in similar areas of the western United States. Adults in northeast metro and large urban areas (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.45, 1.81; and OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.08, 1.74, respectively) were more likely to be inactive than those residing in western metro and large urban areas.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of physical inactivity varies by degree of urbanization and geographic region of the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15570145     DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000147589.98744.85

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  39 in total

1.  Urban-rural differences in physical activity in Belgian adults and the importance of psychosocial factors.

Authors:  Delfien Van Dyck; Greet Cardon; Benedicte Deforche; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Availability of physical activity-related facilities and neighborhood demographic and socioeconomic characteristics: a national study.

Authors:  Lisa M Powell; Sandy Slater; Frank J Chaloupka; Deborah Harper
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Seat belt use among American Indians/Alaska Natives and non-Hispanic whites.

Authors:  Andrea N Garcia; Kushang V Patel; Jack M Guralnik
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Perceived built environment and physical activity in U.S. women by sprawl and region.

Authors:  Philip J Troped; Kosuke Tamura; Heather A Whitcomb; Francine Laden
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  The role of genealogy and clinical family histories in documenting possible inheritance patterns for diabetes mellitus in the pre-insulin era: part 1. The clinical case of Josephine Imperato.

Authors:  Pascal James Imperato; Gavin H Imperato
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2009-10

6.  Assessing environmental support for better health: active living opportunity audits in rural communities in the southern United States.

Authors:  Jennifer C Robinson; Tiffany L Carson; Erica R Johnson; Claudia M Hardy; James M Shikany; Eva Green; Lillie M Willis; John V Marron; Yufeng Li; Choo Hyung Lee; Monica L Baskin
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Planning for pedestrians and bicyclists: results from a statewide municipal survey.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Semra A Aytur; Sara B Satinsky; Zachary Y Kerr; Daniel A Rodríguez
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2011-09

8.  Urban and rural differences in sedentary behavior among American and Canadian youth.

Authors:  Valerie Carson; Ronald J Iannotti; William Pickett; Ian Janssen
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 4.078

9.  Associations between urbanisation and components of the health-risk transition in Thailand. A descriptive study of 87,000 Thai adults.

Authors:  Lynette L-Y Lim; Tord Kjellstrom; Adrian Sleigh; Suwanee Khamman; Sam-Ang Seubsman; Jane Dixon; Cathy Banwell
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 2.640

10.  Prevalence of physical activity and sedentary behaviors by metropolitan status in 4th-, 8th-, and 11th-grade students in Texas, 2004-2005.

Authors:  Andrew E Springer; Deanna M Hoelscher; Brian Castrucci; Adriana Perez; Steven H Kelder
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.