| Literature DB >> 30782217 |
Min Liu1, Li Ao2, Xinyu Hu3, Jianning Ma4, Kena Bao2, Ye Gu2, Jing Zhao2, Weiping Huang5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Some studies have suggested that blood glucose fluctuation and C-peptide level were considered as predictive factors for carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT). However, the relationships of these variables are unclear. This research was aimed to identify the potential effects of blood glucose fluctuation, C-peptide level and conventional risk factors on CIMT.Entities:
Keywords: Blood glucose fluctuation; CIMT; T2DM
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30782217 PMCID: PMC6381641 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-019-0370-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Med Res ISSN: 0949-2321 Impact factor: 2.175
Basic information of the study population
| Variables | T2DM patients | CIMT ≥ 0.9 | CIMT < 0.9 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender, (male/female)a | 181/99 | 48/18 | 133/81 | 0.1160 |
| Age, yearsb | 61 (51–71) | 66 (56–76) | 59 (50–68) | 0.0002 |
| BMI, kg/m2c | 24.64 ± 3.75 | 25.09 ± 3.52 | 24.51 ± 3.81 | 0.2869 |
| Illness yearsb | 6 (1–13) | 10 (4–25) | 6 (0.6–11) | 0.0063 |
| Hypertension, | 170 (60.71) | 46 (69.70) | 124 (57.94) | 0.0870 |
| Cerebral infarction, | 34 (12.14) | 11 (16.67) | 23 (10.75) | 0.1980 |
| Smoker, | 78 (27.86) | 22 (33.33) | 56 (26.17) | 0.2560 |
| Daily smoking amountb | 0 (0–4) | 0 (0–12.5) | 0 (0–2) | 0.3410 |
BMI body mass index
aChi squared test
bOne-way ANOVA
cKruskal–Wallis equality-of-populations rank test
The risk factors leading to CIMT abnormality in T2DM patients
| Variables | OR (95% CI) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Gender | 39.95 (0.14–11,145.7) | 0.199 |
| Age, years | 0.90 (0.74–1.09) | 0.274 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 2.69 (0.99–7.32) | 0.052 |
| Illness years | 1.17 (0.88–1.54) | 0.278 |
| Hypertension | 22.70 (0.35–1468.49) | 0.142 |
| Cerebral infarction | 0.32 (4.86e−15–2.13e+13) | 0.944 |
| Smoker | 133,860.6 (2.83–6.33e+09) | 0.032 |
| Daily smoking amount | 0.75 (0.55–1.01) | 0.055 |
| HDL, mmol/L | 0.01 (2.83e−07–467.55) | 0.410 |
| LDL, mmol/L | 0.02 (0.0002–1.34) | 0.068 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 22.06 (0.33–1497.07) | 0.151 |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 0.75 (0.14–4.20) | 0.747 |
| Creatinine, μmol/L | 1.00 (0.99–1.00) | 0.913 |
| Serum urea, mmol/L | 2.71 (0.74–9.97) | 0.134 |
| UA, μmol/L | 0.95 (0.91–0.99) | 0.047 |
| C-peptide level | 0.06 (0.0005–5.58) | 0.220 |
| 0.5 h C-peptide level | 0.28 (0.01–6.45) | 0.429 |
| 2 h C-peptide level | 2.65 (1.00–7.00) | 0.049 |
| Hba1c | 0.53 (0.17–1.63) | 0.267 |
| FPG | 1.42 (0.73–2.77) | 0.305 |
| PPG | 1.14 (0.77–1.67) | 0.518 |
| HCY, mmol/L | 1.33 (0.80–2.21) | 0.279 |
| MA/CR | 1.00 (0.99–1.00) | 0.093 |
| PPGE | 0.59 (0.31–1.12) | 0.105 |
| LAGE | 0.24 (0.05–1.20) | 0.081 |
| SDBG | 281.99 (1.24–64,149.02) | 0.042 |
UA uric acid, BMI body mass index, HDL high-density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, FPG fasting plasma glucose, PPG postprandial plasma glucose, HCY homocysteine, MA/CR microalbumin/creatinine ratio, PPGE postprandial glycemic excursions, LAGE largest amplitude of glycemic excursions, SDBG standard deviation of blood glucose, MAGE mean amplitude of glycemic excursions
Fig. 1The proportion of complications in different PPGE groups
Fig. 2The proportion of complications in different LAGE groups
Fig. 3The proportion of complications in different SDBG groups