| Literature DB >> 33787619 |
Yuxin Huang1, Yuanyuan Xu, Jieyuzhen Qiu, Cuiping Jiang, Wen Tan, Xiaoming Tao, Qin Gu, Jiao Sun.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: This study was aimed at assessing the impact of the dusk phenomenon on the total glucose exposure in Chinese people with type 2 diabetes.A total of 380 type 2 diabetes who received a retrospective continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMs) for 72 hours were enrolled in our study, 32 of them failed in CGMs. The patients were first divided into 2 groups: dusk phenomenon (n = 95) and non dusk phenomenon group (n = 253). The magnitude of the dusk phenomenon (δDusk) was quantified by pre-dinner glucose minus post-lunch 2 hours glucose. A persistent δDusk ≥ 0 or a once only δDusk < 0 can be diagnosed with the dusk phenomenon. The participants were secondarily matched for the post-lunch 2 hours glucose to assess the impact of the dusk phenomenon on the overall glucose exposure. The impact of the dusk phenomenon was assessed on high-performance liquid chromatography assay (HbA1c) and 24-hour mean glucose.There were 95 of 348 (27.3%) participants with the dusk phenomenon in the overall population, and the median of δDusk level was -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2) mmol/L. The median of glucose differences between the 2 paired groups were 0.4 (-0.4, 1.0)% for HbA1c, 0.9 (0.2, 1.4) mmol/L for 24 hours mean glucose. The correlation analysis showed no relationship between the magnitude of dawn phenomenon and the dusk phenomenon (r = 0.052, P = .472).The incidence of dusk phenomenon is about 27.3% in people with type 2 diabetes. The impacts of dusk phenomenon on HbA1c and 24-hour mean glucose were about 0.4% and 0.9 mmol/L and the dusk phenomenon was not related with the dawn phenomenon.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33787619 PMCID: PMC8021309 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025298
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1Participants disposition and study protocol. Participants of the total investigated population were firstly divided into 2 groups according to whether they exhibited or not the dusk phenomenon. All separated participants were secondarily matched for the post-lunch 2 hours glucose that was taken as reference for the calculation of the dusk glucose increment.
Main clinical characteristics of patients in the overall population and in the different groups after selection for presence/absence of the dusk phenomenon and after matching for post-lunch 2 hours glucose.
| Overall | Non DP | DP | Impact of DP | ||
| Number | 348 | 66 | 66 | ||
| Male/female | 190/158 | 39/27 | 33/33 | .382 | |
| Age, y | 63.1 ± 11.5 | 62.2 ± 11.7 | 63.1 ± 10.0 | .638 | |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 25.1 ± 3.2 | 25.5 ± 3.0 | 25.3 ± 2.9 | .716 | |
| HOMA-IR | 3.4 ± 1.7 | 3.1 ± 1.7 | 3.3 ± 1.3 | .300 | |
| HOMA-β | 60.0 (40.6, 84.1) | 63.6 (44.8, 91.2) | 48.6 (33.0, 75.2) | .009 | |
| Mean glucose value, mmol/L | |||||
| Nocturnal nadir | 5.8 ± 1.2 | 5.4 ± 0.8 | 6.2 ± 1.4 | 0.9 (–0.3, 1.7) | <.0001 |
| Pre-breakfast | 7.1 ± 1.4 | 6.7 ± 1.2 | 7.5 ± 1.3 | 0.8 (0, 1.8) | .001 |
| Post-breakfast 2 hour | 8.8 ± 2.2 | 8.1 ± 1.9 | 9.2 ± 2.0 | 1.2 (–0.6, 2.8) | .003 |
| Pre-lunch | 7.5 ± 2.1 | 6.8 ± 1.6 | 7.7 ± 2.1 | 0.6 (–0.8, 2.2) | .004 |
| Post-lunch 2 hour | 8.2 ± 1.9 | 7.7 ± 1.3 | 7.7 ± 1.3 | 0 | 1.000 |
| Pre-dinner | 7.3 ± 1.8 | 6.3 ± 1.2 | 8.8 ± 1.8 | 2.1 (1.2, 3.3) | <.0001 |
| Post-dinner 2 hour | 8.4 ± 2.0 | 7.8 ± 1.7 | 9.0 ± 2.0 | 1.2 (–0.1, 2.8) | <.0001 |
| HbA1c (%) | 7.0 ± 0.8 | 6.7 ± 0.8 | 7.1 ± 0.8 | 0.4 (–0.4, 1.0) | .004 |
| 24 hours mean glucose, mmol/L | 7.5 ± 1.2 | 7.1 ± 0.9 | 8.1 ± 1.0 | 0.9 (0.2, 1.4) | <.0001 |
| δDawn, mmol/L | 1.0 (0.3, 1.8) | 1.0 (0.3, 1.7) | 1.2 (0.4, 1.8) | .935 | |
| δDusk, mmol/L | –0.8 (–1.8, 0.2) | –0.9 (–1.7, –0.4) | 0.7 (0.3, 1.5) | <.0001 |
Data are means ± SD, median (interquartile range) or number (percentage). The impact of the dusk phenomenon was assessed by calculating the differences between HbA1c levels and glucose profiles in different groups of patients with/without a dusk phenomenon and matched for post-lunch 2 hours glucose.
δDawn = pre-breakfast glucose minus nocturnal nadir glucose, δDusk = pre-dinner glucose minus post-lunch 2 hours glucose, DP = dusk phenomenon, HOMA-β = homeostasis model assessment-β cell function, HOMA-IR = homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance.
P values indicate the statistical significance between non DP and DP.
Figure 2Continuous glucose profiles of people with dusk phenomenon and people without dusk phenomenon. Black solid line = people with dusk phenomenon (DP); black dotted line = 95% confidence interval for people with dusk phenomenon (DP); grey solid line = people without dusk phenomenon (NDP). Grey dotted line = 95% confidence interval for people without dusk phenomenon (NDP).