| Literature DB >> 30781422 |
Xiangke Kong1,2, Chunhui Li3, Ping Wang4,5, Guoxin Huang6, Zhitao Li7, Zhantao Han8,9.
Abstract
An investigation was made into the effects of tannery sludge on soil chemical properties and microbial communities in a typical soil profile with long-term tannery sludge contamination, North China. The results showed that trivalent chromium (Cr(III)), ammonium, organic nitrogen, salinity and sulfide were the predominant contaminants in tannery sludge. Although the tannery sludge contained high chromium (Cr, 3,0970 mg/kg), the proportion of mobile Cr forms (exchangeable plus carbonate-bound fraction) only accounted for 1.32%. The X-ray diffraction and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results further demonstrated that the Cr existed in a stable state of oxides and iron oxides. The alkaline loam soil had a significant retardation effect on the migration of salinity, ammonium, Cr(III) and sulfide, and the accumulation of these contaminants occurred in soils (0⁻40 cm). A good correlation (R² = 0.959) was observed between total organic carbon (TOC) and Cr(III) in the soil profile, indicating that the dissolved organic matter from sludge leachate promoted the vertical mobility of Cr(III) via forming Cr(III)-organic complexes. The halotolerant bacteria (Halomonas and Tepidimicrobium) and organic degrading bacteria (Flavobacteriaceae, Tepidimicrobium and Balneola) became the dominant microflora in the soil profile. High contents of salinity, Cr and nitrogen were the main environmental factors affecting the abundance of indigenous microorganisms in soils.Entities:
Keywords: chromium; microbial community; soil profile; tannery sludge; vertical migration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30781422 PMCID: PMC6407015 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16040563
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Location of the contaminated site and sites of soil sampling.
Physicochemical characteristics of tannery sludge and soil samples at the different depths.
| Sample | Depth/cm | Moisture/% | pH | Salinity | TOC/wt% | Total Cr/mg/kg | Cr(Ⅲ)/mg/kg | Total Nitrogen/mg/kg | Ammonium/mg/kg | Organic-N/mg/kg | Sulfide/mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TS 1 | surface | 64.1 | 7.67 | 99,000 | 14.3 | 30,970 | 30,800 | 33,080 | 16,080 | 16,500 | 4910 |
| S1 2 | 0~20 | 48.3 | 7.94 | 17,500 | 12.2 | 25,500 | 25,427 | 28,390 | 9010 | 19,271 | 75 |
| S2 2 | 20~40 | 17.9 | 8.37 | 17,800 | 0.73 | 672.61 | 672 | 1224 | 435 | 719 | 52 |
| S3 2 | 40~60 | 18.1 | 8.12 | 10,200 | 0.34 | 186.46 | 184 | 816 | 268 | 507 | 47 |
| S4 2 | 60~80 | 21.1 | 8.39 | 7860 | 0.31 | 150.61 | 150 | 900 | 252 | 616 | 38 |
| S5 2 | 80~100 | 18.5 | 8.31 | 9220 | 0.21 | 70.39 | 69.8 | 654 | 171 | 463 | <10 |
| S6 2 | 120~150 | 19.5 | 8.06 | 6850 | 0.20 | 77.27 | 76.6 | 864 | 292 | 551 | <10 |
| S7 2 | 150~180 | 21.5 | 8.42 | 6330 | 0.14 | 67.76 | 67.2 | 630 | 113 | 508 | <10 |
| S8 2 | 180~200 | 18.9 | 8.20 | 1670 | 0.27 | 78.12 | 77.5 | 817 | 85 | 723 | <10 |
| US1 3 | 0~20 | 14.4 | 8.30 | 1480 | 0.23 | 70 | 69.86 | 1210 | <20 | 1178 | <10 |
| US2 3 | 120~150 | 16.8 | 8.01 | 717 | 0.14 | 67.2 | 66.58 | 154 | <20 | 152 | <10 |
1 “TS” means the tannery sludge. 2 “S” means a contaminated soil in the vertical profile. 3 “US” means an uncontaminated soil.
Figure 2Characterization analysis results of the tannery sludge. (A) scanning electron microscope, SEM; (B) X-ray diffraction, XRD; (C): X-ray fluorescence, XRF; (D): X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, XPS).
Figure 3The distribution of major contaminants in the sludge-contaminated soil profile.
Contents of the different Cr species extracted by a Tessier procedure in the soil samples.
| Samples | Depth/cm | Exchangeable/mg/kg | Carbonate/mg/kg | Fe/Mn Oxides | Strong Organic/mg/kg | Residual/mg/kg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tannery sludge | 0 | 153 | 229 | 21,700 | 3860 | 2880 |
| S1 | 10 | 11.2 | 124 | 18,100 | 7580 | 3110 |
| S2 | 20 | 2.5 | 6.7 | 141.6 | 117.2 | 353.2 |
| S3 | 40 | <0.5 | 1.3 | 40.7 | 29.4 | 121.8 |
Figure 4Linear correlation between Cr(III) and total organic carbon (TOC) in the soil profile.
Figure 5Relative abundances of bacterial taxa recovered from each sample. (A) phylum level; (B): genus level.
Figure 6Cluster analysis of soil samples (A): the unweighted unifrac analysis (NMDS) plot based on the unweighted UniFrac distances; (B) the unweighted pair group with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) plot based on Unweighted pair-group method with arithmetic means.
Spearman rank correlation analysis of the soil contaminants with the dominant genera.
| Contaminant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| salinity | 0.972 ** | −0.579 * | 0.003 | 0.021 | 0.997 ** | 0.982 ** |
| TOC | 0.667 * | −0.676 * | 0.578 * | 0.587 * | 0.788 ** | 0.732 * |
| Cr | 0.676 * | −0.667 * | 0.563 * | 0.572 * | 0.796 ** | 0.743 * |
| ammonium | 0.799 ** | −0.643 * | 0.388 | 0.400 | 0.900** | 0.863 ** |
| organic-N | 0.524 | −0.649 * | 0.707 * | 0.714 * | 0.662 * | 0.598 * |
** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level. * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.