| Literature DB >> 26500442 |
Seung Hak Yang1, Joung Soo Lim2, Modabber Ahmed Khan2, Bong Soo Kim3, Dong Yoon Choi2, Eun Young Lee4, Hee Kwon Ahn5.
Abstract
The leachate generated by the decomposition of animal carcass has been implicated as an environmental contaminant surrounding the burial site. High-throughput nucleotide sequencing was conducted to investigate the bacterial communities in leachates from the decomposition of pig carcasses. We acquired 51,230 reads from six different samples (1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 14 week-old carcasses) and found that sequences representing the phylum Firmicutes predominated. The diversity of bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences in the leachate was the highest at 6 weeks, in contrast to those at 2 and 14 weeks. The relative abundance of Firmicutes was reduced, while the proportion of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria increased from 3-6 weeks. The representation of phyla was restored after 14 weeks. However, the community structures between the samples taken at 1-2 and 14 weeks differed at the bacterial classification level. The trend in pH was similar to the changes seen in bacterial communities, indicating that the pH of the leachate could be related to the shift in the microbial community. The results indicate that the composition of bacterial communities in leachates of decomposing pig carcasses shifted continuously during the study period and might be influenced by the burial site.Entities:
Keywords: bacterial community; decomposition; leachate; pig; pyrosequencing
Year: 2015 PMID: 26500442 PMCID: PMC4612598 DOI: 10.1590/S1415-475738320140252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Mol Biol ISSN: 1415-4757 Impact factor: 1.771
Comparison of pH to the abundance of bacterial 16S rDNA sequences of leachates from decomposing pig carcasses.
| Sample (week) | pH | Analyzed reads | Normalized reads | Average length (bp) | Observed OTUs | Estimated OTUs (Chao1) | Shannon Index | Good’s coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.59 | 4,100 | 4,100 | 454.44 | 667 | 2,910.31 | 4.10 | 0.87 |
| 2 | 6.47 | 5,230 | 4,100 | 457.63 | 549 | 1,977.74 | 3.05 | 0.90 |
| 3 | 6.46 | 17,035 | 4,100 | 455.34 | 799 | 5,147.62 | 3.45 | 0.84 |
| 4 | 6.51 | 7,805 | 4,100 | 454.88 | 650 | 3,177.83 | 3.22 | 0.87 |
| 6 | 8.79 | 5,674 | 4,100 | 458.89 | 1,002 | 4,349.40 | 4.58 | 0.81 |
| 14 | 6.48 | 11,386 | 4,100 | 455.65 | 593 | 2,645.86 | 3.06 | 0.88 |
Figure 1Rarefaction curves of six different samples obtained from leachates. Each number indicates the time of sampling.
Figure 2Double pie charts of bacterial communities. The inner and outer pies represent the composition of phyla and genera, respectively. The numbers above each pie indicates the sampling time. The nomenclature of phylotypes is based on the EzTaxon-e database (Kim ; http://eztaxon-e.ezbiocloud.net/).
Figure 3Differences between bacterial communities at each time point were analyzed and compared using PCoA based on Fast UniFrac distance. The number above each circle indicates the sampling time.
Figure 4Comparison of the species compositions of bacterial communities during each period. The names of species are based on the EzTaxon-e database.