Literature DB >> 30773760

First Synthesis and Characterization of CH4 @C60.

Sally Bloodworth1, Gabriela Sitinova1, Shamim Alom1, Sara Vidal1, George R Bacanu1, Stuart J Elliott1,2, Mark E Light1, Julie M Herniman1, G John Langley1, Malcolm H Levitt1, Richard J Whitby1.   

Abstract

The endohedral fullerene CH4 @C60 , in which each C60 fullerene cage encapsulates a single methane molecule, has been synthesized for the first time. Methane is the first organic molecule, as well as the largest, to have been encapsulated in C60 to date. The key orifice contraction step, a photochemical desulfinylation of an open fullerene, was completed, even though it is inhibited by the endohedral molecule. The crystal structure of the nickel(II) octaethylporphyrin/ benzene solvate shows no significant distortion of the carbon cage, relative to the C60 analogue, and shows the methane hydrogens as a shell of electron density around the central carbon, indicative of the quantum nature of the methane. The 1 H spin-lattice relaxation times (T1 ) for endohedral methane are similar to those observed in the gas phase, indicating that methane is freely rotating inside the C60 cage. The synthesis of CH4 @C60 opens a route to endofullerenes incorporating large guest molecules and atoms.
© 2019 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NMR spectroscopy; X-ray diffraction; endohedral fullerene; mass spectrometry; synthetic methods

Year:  2019        PMID: 30773760      PMCID: PMC6492075          DOI: 10.1002/anie.201900983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl        ISSN: 1433-7851            Impact factor:   15.336


Soon after the discovery of C60 in 1985,1 came recognition that its approximately spherical 3.7 Å diameter cavity provides a unique environment in which to isolate single atoms.2 Since then endohedral fullerenes, that is, compounds denoted A@C60 in which molecules or atoms are enclosed within the fullerene cage, have been the focus of substantial experimental and theoretical efforts.3, 4, 5 Endohedral fullerenes may be synthesized by forming the fullerene in the presence of the endohedral species (particularly successful for metallofullerenes),3, 5 by high temperature and pressure treatment of the fullerene with the endohedral species (inert gas@C60),6, 7 or by ion bombardment of the fullerene (N@C60),8 but all give very low incorporation and require extensive purification. Furthermore, these methods are not applicable to the incorporation of small organic molecules. The macroscopic‐scale preparation of endohedral fullerenes by multi‐step “molecular surgery”9, 10, 11, 12 involves chemically opening an orifice in the fullerene, of a size suitable to allow entry of the single molecule. Suturing of this orifice to restore the pristine carbon cage was pioneered by Komatsu13, 14 and Murata15 who reported the first syntheses of H2@C60 and H2O@C60 following insertion of H2 or H2O under high‐pressure, into open‐cage fullerenes 1 and 2, respectively. Optimized procedures for the synthesis of H2@C60 and H2O@C60 have subsequently been reported by ourselves,16 based on Murata's open‐cage C60 derivative 2, and also applied to the synthesis of HF@C60 (Figure 1).17, 18
Figure 1

Open‐cage fullerenes. Preparation of H2@C60 from 1, and of H2O@C60 and HF@C60 from 2, is known; as are a series of open‐cage derivatives A@3.

Open‐cage fullerenes. Preparation of H2@C60 from 1, and of H2O@C60 and HF@C60 from 2, is known; as are a series of open‐cage derivatives A@3. The macroscopic quantities of endohedral fullerenes provided by molecular surgery have allowed detailed investigation of physical properties, including by neutron scattering, infrared spectroscopy, and NMR spectroscopy.19 These methods have shown that, as a result of the inert and highly symmetrical environment of the cavity, an entrapped molecule behaves much as would be expected in the very low‐pressure gas state,17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 displaying free rotation at cryogenic temperatures.19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24 The 16‐membered orifice of 2 is too small to allow entry of bigger guests, but these can be accommodated by the larger (17‐membered) opening of fullerene 3.25 Insertion of N2 and CO2,26 CH3OH and H2CO,27 CH4 and NH3,28 NO ,29 and O2,30 into 3 have all been recently described, but a procedure for suturing the opening of A@3 to give A@C60 has not yet been reported. In this article, we describe the successful closure of A@3 to give A@C60. The endohedral fullerenes H2@C60 and H2O@C60 are exceptional platforms for the study of nuclear spin isomerism,24, 31, 32, 33 in which only certain combinations of nuclear spin states and molecular rotational states are allowed by the Pauli principle. We are particularly interested in CH4@C60, since spin isomerism is also exhibited by methane, which exists as three nuclear spin isomers with the J=0 rotational state having nuclear spin I=2, the J=1 rotational state having nuclear spin I=1, and the J=2 rotational state having nuclear spin states I=0 and I=1.34, 35 Methane is one of the largest possible guests for C60 36 and herein, we report conditions for optimized CH4 encapsulation by 3 and the first successful closure sequence to reform the pristine C60 cage. Our work constitutes the first synthesis of CH4@C60 and raises the exciting prospect of accessing other endohedral fullerenes, A@C60, in which the endohedral species is a “large” guest molecule; including A=O2, N2, CO, NO, NH3, CH3OH, CH2O, and CO2, as well as the atoms Ar and Kr. CH4@C60 was prepared according to the procedures shown in Scheme 1. Open‐cage fullerene 3 was obtained from bis(hemiketal) 4 15 according to the published method.25 We have previously shown the 17‐membered orifice of 3 to be suitable for entry of a single molecule of methane, achieving 65 % encapsulation by heating 3 at 200 °C under 153 atm of methane.28 Upon increasing the pressure of methane above 1500 atm, we obtained CH4@3 with more than 95 % encapsulation of methane (estimated from the 1H NMR spectrum) after 22 h at 190 °C. Oxidation with dimethyldioxirane37 gave the sulfoxide CH4@5 cleanly. Photochemical removal of the sulfinyl group (SO) has been reported for ring‐contraction of the sulfoxide derivative of open‐cage fullerene 1, using visible‐light irradiation.13, 38, 39, 40 Unfortunately, Murata and co‐workers found that the sulfoxide derivative of 3 (i.e. 5) does not undergo simple loss of SO under the same conditions, but undergoes decomposition accompanied by a low‐yielding rearrangement to a lactone side product.41 However, we noted that the dominant species in the positive‐ion atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) mass spectrum of 5 appears at m/z=1102.18 and corresponds to the radical cation C82H26N2O4 +· resulting from loss of SO from 5, indicating that ring‐contraction by photochemical removal of SO is feasible. Since we found that the expected product 2 from the photochemical ring‐contraction is unstable under visible light irradiation, we considered that the reaction might be facilitated if 2 could be trapped in situ as the bis(hemiketal) 4. We were pleased to observe that in a mixed solvent system of toluene, acetonitrile, and acetic acid (10 % v/v aq.), irradiation of sulfoxide 5 (containing endohedral water under the partly aqueous reaction conditions), in the visible range for 24 h with an 11 W bulb, gave a mixture of 4 and H2O@4 in 25 % yield of isolated product, with a similar amount of unreacted 5 remaining. A longer period of irradiation did not lead to a higher yield of 4. Product(s) of polymerization or decomposition, which were not identified, accounted for the remaining material, and none of the lactone product recovered by Murata et al. was isolated.
Scheme 1

Synthesis of CH4@C60. Optimized CH4 encapsulation by 3 and a successful closure sequence, involving photochemical desulfinylation, are applied to the first synthesis of CH4@C60.

Synthesis of CH4@C60. Optimized CH4 encapsulation by 3 and a successful closure sequence, involving photochemical desulfinylation, are applied to the first synthesis of CH4@C60. When CH4@5 was subjected to identical photochemical conditions, the corresponding product of SO loss followed by hydration, CH4@4, was obtained in only 5 % yield, retaining more than 95 % methane filling. We confirmed that the observed drop in yield is due to the presence of endohedral methane by carrying out photolysis on a sample of CH4@5 with 83 % filling (Supporting Information, Section S5), from which the product CH4@4 was obtained with only 57 % filling as a result of the much higher‐yielding conversion of the portion of the material that does not contain methane. The yield of the photochemical ring‐contraction was significantly increased upon switching to irradiation with monochromatic (yellow) light at 589 nm, using a low‐pressure sodium lamp. A mixture of 5 and H2O@5 was converted to the bis(hemiketal) mixture (4 + H2O@4) in 43 % yield of isolated product. The corresponding reaction of CH4@5 under irradiation at 589 nm gave CH4@4 in a yield of 13 %, in accordance with the expected inhibition of the reaction by endohedral methane, and is a valuable improvement in comparison with the very low yield obtained using white light. It is rare for endohedral species to affect the reactivity of the fullerene cage,42, 43 particularly in such a dramatic (and unfortunate) fashion, but while it is disappointing that this step remains low‐yielding, with CH4@4 in hand we were now able to adapt known procedures for suturing of the bis(hemiketal) orifice to an intact C60 shell. CH4@4 (more than 95 % filling) was contaminated by a trace of H2O@4, identified by the 1H NMR resonance of endohedral water at δ=−9.84 ppm16 and distinct from the 1H resonance for endohedral methane in CH4@4, which appears as a sharp singlet at δ=−11.22 ppm (CDCl3). Since the percentage filling of H2O will be amplified by a factor of approximately five during photochemical ring contraction (Supporting Information, Section S5.1), we extrapolate the methane filling in CH4@5 to be more than 99.5 %. To avoid final contamination of CH4@C60 by H2O@C60, CH4@4 was heated at 140 °C under a dynamic vacuum (approximately 0.5 mm Hg) for 36 h to obtain CH4@2 with accompanying removal of the endohedral water contaminant. No loss of CH4 was observed. Subsequent reduction to CH4@6 using di‐(2‐furyl)phenylphosphine in toluene, at a temperature of 50 °C (too low for water re‐entry), gave CH4@6 (more than 95 % filling) in quantitative yield. Endohedral methane appears as a singlet with a shift of δ H=−9.82 ppm (700 MHz, [D8]THF, 295 K) in the 1H NMR spectrum of CH4@6, and no H2O@6 was present. Finally, the orifice of CH4@6 was sutured, using identical conditions to those reported for H2O@6,16 and CH4@C60 was obtained with 100.0±0.3 % filling after removal of traces of (empty) C60 by preparative HPLC on a Cosmosil™ Buckyprep column. An independently prepared sample of H2O@C60 was found to co‐elute with CH4@C60, confirming the necessity for removal of contaminant endohedral water earlier in the synthesis. The positive‐ion APPI mass spectrum of CH4@C60 is in agreement with the calculated isotope distribution pattern for C61H4 (Figure 2), and the ultrahigh resolution also confirms that H2O@C60 is not present since the isotope patterns for CH4@C60 and H2O@C60 were shown to be non‐overlapping (Supporting Information, Section S4).
Figure 2

Positive‐ion APPI mass spectrum of CH4@C60. a) Experimental data and b) model isotope pattern for C61H4; m/z 735–740.

Positive‐ion APPI mass spectrum of CH4@C60. a) Experimental data and b) model isotope pattern for C61H4; m/z 735–740. A crystal structure of the nickel(II) octaethylporphyrin/ benzene solvate44 of CH4@C60 was obtained (CCDC 1858399 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre.) and is similar to that reported for the equivalent C60 solvate,45 with the exception of a spherically symmetrical electron density distribution located at the center of the fullerene, corresponding to the endohedral methane molecule. The electron density map shows a faint spherical shell around the main center of the endohedral electron density, at a radius of 1.03 Å (Figure 3). This shell of distributed electron density corresponds to the delocalized nuclear wavefunction of the methane hydrogens, as expected for a quantum description of the freely rotating molecule. This quantum description is well‐established for the analogous systems H2@C60, H2O@C60, and HF@C60, which have been extensively studied by neutron‐scattering and infrared spectroscopy.17, 20, 21, 22 A classical description in which the methane explores a random set of orientations would give a similar result. There is no geometrical evidence (within 3‐sigma) for distortion of the cage relative to the C60 analogue, or displacement of the methane from its center.
Figure 3

Crystal structure for the nickel(II) octaethylporphyrin/ benzene solvate of CH4@C60. a) Thermal ellipsoids for the cage atoms of CH4@C60 and the difference electron density map for endohedral CH4 (surface drawn at the 0.6 e Å3 level) are shown. NiIIOEP and benzene are shown as thermal ellipsoids in white and all thermal ellipsoids are shown at 50 % probability. b) Selected slice through the center of difference electron density at the CH4 position, contours drawn at approximately 0.9 e Å3. A faint shell of electron density at a radius of 1.03 Å from the center of the cage is visible. This corresponds to the delocalized wavefunction of the methane hydrogen atoms. CCDC 1858399 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. Structure details are reported in Section S6 of the Supporting Information.

Crystal structure for the nickel(II) octaethylporphyrin/ benzene solvate of CH4@C60. a) Thermal ellipsoids for the cage atoms of CH4@C60 and the difference electron density map for endohedral CH4 (surface drawn at the 0.6 e Å3 level) are shown. NiIIOEP and benzene are shown as thermal ellipsoids in white and all thermal ellipsoids are shown at 50 % probability. b) Selected slice through the center of difference electron density at the CH4 position, contours drawn at approximately 0.9 e Å3. A faint shell of electron density at a radius of 1.03 Å from the center of the cage is visible. This corresponds to the delocalized wavefunction of the methane hydrogen atoms. CCDC 1858399 contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. Structure details are reported in Section S6 of the Supporting Information. Detailed NMR characterization of CH4@C60 was carried out. The 1H NMR spectrum in 1,2‐dichlorobenzene‐d 4 displays a singlet at δ H=−5.71 ppm, where the shift results from the shielding effect of the C60 cage, compared with 12CH4 in the gas phase, which has a chemical shift of δ H=2.166±0.002 ppm.46 From the natural abundance 13CH4@C60, the measured coupling is 1 J HC=124.3±0.2 Hz (at 295 K), in comparison with 1 J HC=125.3 Hz (at 292 K) measured in the gas phase.47 The liquid state 13C{1H} NMR spectrum reports a sharp singlet for endohedral methane at δ C=−13.63 ppm in 1,2‐dichlorobenzene‐d 4, again shielded in comparison with the reported shift of δ C=−8.648±0.001 ppm measured in the gas phase46 (Figure 4 a,b).
Figure 4

1H and 13C NMR resonances for endohedral methane in CH4@C60. a) Experimental 1H NMR resonance of CH4@C60 acquired with 1 transient, b) Experimental 13C NMR resonance of CH4@C60 with 1H WALTZ16 decoupling (nutation frequency=14.2 kHz), acquired with 4928 transients and a delay of 10 s between scans, c) Experimental non‐proton‐decoupled 13C INEPT spectrum, acquired with 35 840 transients and a delay of 4.5 s between scans, d) Experimental non‐proton‐decoupled 13C NMR spectrum excited by a single 90° pulse, acquired with 35 840 transients and a delay of 4.5 s between scans, e) Numerical simulation of (d) using SpinDynamica.50 All experimental spectra were acquired for a degassed 4.5 mm sample of CH4@C60 in 1,2‐dichlorobenzene‐d 4 at 16.45 T (1H nuclear Larmor frequency=700 MHz and 13C nuclear Larmor frequency=176 MHz) and 295 K.

1H and 13C NMR resonances for endohedral methane in CH4@C60. a) Experimental 1H NMR resonance of CH4@C60 acquired with 1 transient, b) Experimental 13C NMR resonance of CH4@C60 with 1H WALTZ16 decoupling (nutation frequency=14.2 kHz), acquired with 4928 transients and a delay of 10 s between scans, c) Experimental non‐proton‐decoupled 13C INEPT spectrum, acquired with 35 840 transients and a delay of 4.5 s between scans, d) Experimental non‐proton‐decoupled 13C NMR spectrum excited by a single 90° pulse, acquired with 35 840 transients and a delay of 4.5 s between scans, e) Numerical simulation of (d) using SpinDynamica.50 All experimental spectra were acquired for a degassed 4.5 mm sample of CH4@C60 in 1,2‐dichlorobenzene‐d 4 at 16.45 T (1H nuclear Larmor frequency=700 MHz and 13C nuclear Larmor frequency=176 MHz) and 295 K. Figure 4 c,d shows the relevant section of the INEPT NMR spectrum of 13 CH4@C60, alongside experimental and simulated proton‐coupled 13C NMR spectra. The INEPT pulse sequence was used as defined by Morris and Freeman48 with an interpulse delay of τ= =2.012 ms (J HC=124.3 Hz). The experimental 13C resonance is a 1:4:6:4:1 quintet with chemical shift δ C=−13.63 ppm. The 13C NMR resonance for the cage in CH4@C60 appears at δ C=143.20 ppm, shifted by Δδ=+0.52 ppm relative to C60 itself. This is a large deshielded shift of the cage 13C NMR resonance in comparison with the effect of smaller molecular endohedral species (HF@C60, Δδ=+0.04 ppm,17 H2@C60, Δδ=+0.08 ppm,16 and H2O@C60, Δδ=+0.11 ppm15, 16), consistent with the large size of methane. Correlation of Δδ with the van der Waals radius of the enclosed species has been described for the inert gas@C60 series.49 The 1H spin‐lattice relaxation time constant of 12CH4@C60 was found to be T 1=1.4904±0.0005 s at 295 K. Measurement of T 1 as a function of temperature indicates a clear increase in relaxation rate constant (T 1 −1) with increasing temperature. This is indicative of a significant spin‐rotation contribution to the relaxation, and is consistent with 1H relaxation of methane in the gas phase51 (Figure 5 a).
Figure 5

Experimental 1H and 13C spin‐lattice relaxation times for endohedral methane in CH4@C60. a) Experimental 1H spin lattice relaxation as a function of temperature for 12CH4@C60. The best straight‐line fit to the experimental data points is shown. 1H longitudinal relaxation times were measured using the inversion‐recovery pulse sequence; b) Experimental 13C spin‐lattice relaxation curves for 13CH4@C60 (natural abundance). Spectra were acquired for a degassed 4.5 mm solution of CH4@C60 in 1,2‐dichlorobenzene‐d 4 at 16.45 T (1H nuclear Larmor frequency=700 MHz) and 295 K. Red data points correspond to the satellite at δ=−5.638 ppm; Blue data points o correspond to the satellite at δ=−5.815 ppm. The 13C longitudinal relaxation time T 1 was measured using the pulse sequence described in Section S3.2 of the Supporting Information. All signal amplitudes were normalized to the maximum integral (second data point, τ EV=1 ms). The fitted curves have single exponential form.

Experimental 1H and 13C spin‐lattice relaxation times for endohedral methane in CH4@C60. a) Experimental 1H spin lattice relaxation as a function of temperature for 12CH4@C60. The best straight‐line fit to the experimental data points is shown. 1H longitudinal relaxation times were measured using the inversion‐recovery pulse sequence; b) Experimental 13C spin‐lattice relaxation curves for 13CH4@C60 (natural abundance). Spectra were acquired for a degassed 4.5 mm solution of CH4@C60 in 1,2‐dichlorobenzene‐d 4 at 16.45 T (1H nuclear Larmor frequency=700 MHz) and 295 K. Red data points correspond to the satellite at δ=−5.638 ppm; Blue data points o correspond to the satellite at δ=−5.815 ppm. The 13C longitudinal relaxation time T 1 was measured using the pulse sequence described in Section S3.2 of the Supporting Information. All signal amplitudes were normalized to the maximum integral (second data point, τ EV=1 ms). The fitted curves have single exponential form. The 13C T 1 values for endohedral methane, reported by the 13C satellites of the 1H spectrum using a modified INEPT sequence (Supporting Information, Section S3.2), are slightly different: T 1=0.39±0.14 s for the less shielded satellite, and T 1=0.55±0.14 s for the more shielded satellite (Figure 5 b). This difference is likely to be associated with cross‐correlated relaxation effects.52 In summary, CH4@C60, the first example of an organic molecule trapped in C60, has been synthesized. CH4 is the largest molecule, with the greatest number of atoms, to have been encapsulated in C60 to date. The first step of the orifice contraction was strongly inhibited by the presence of endohedral methane, resulting in a low yield for the key photolytic step. CH4@C60 was characterized by high resolution mass spectrometry, NMR spectroscopy, and X‐ray crystallography. 1H spin‐lattice relaxation times for endohedral methane are similar to those observed in the gas phase, providing evidence that methane is freely rotating inside the C60 cage. The experimental 13C NMR chemical shift of the cage carbon is shifted by +0.52 ppm relative to empty C60. We find no evidence for distortion of the cage from a crystal structure of the nickel(II) octaethylporphyrin/ benzene solvate of CH4@C60. In the crystal structure, the hydrogen atoms of methane appear as a spherically symmetric sphere of electron density, consistent with a delocalized quantum state. Neutron scattering, infrared spectroscopy, and cryogenic NMR spectroscopy experiments are now planned to study spin‐isomerism and spin‐isomer conversion of the encapsulated methane molecules. The successful synthesis of CH4@C60 opens a route to novel endofullerenes A@C60 enclosing “large” endohedral species A, such as A=O2, NO, NH3, N2, CO2, CH3OH, and H2CO, with exciting prospects for the study of these encapsulated small molecules.

Experimental Section

Details of the synthesis and characterization of CH4@C60 are in the Supporting Information. Original data may be found at https://doi.org/10.5258/SOTON/D0809.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors. Supplementary Click here for additional data file.
  40 in total

1.  Nuclear Spin Conversion in CH4: A Multichannel Relaxation Mechanism.

Authors:  Patrice Cacciani; Jean Cosléou; Mohamed Khelkhal; Peter Čermák; Cristina Puzzarini
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  Nuclear spin conversion of water inside fullerene cages detected by low-temperature nuclear magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Salvatore Mamone; Maria Concistrè; Elisa Carignani; Benno Meier; Andrea Krachmalnicoff; Ole G Johannessen; Xuegong Lei; Yongjun Li; Mark Denning; Marina Carravetta; Kelvin Goh; Anthony J Horsewill; Richard J Whitby; Malcolm H Levitt
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Synthesis and characterisation of an open-cage fullerene encapsulating hydrogen fluoride.

Authors:  Andrea Krachmalnicoff; Richard Bounds; Salvatore Mamone; Malcolm H Levitt; Marina Carravetta; Richard J Whitby
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Unprecedented photochemical rearrangement of an open-cage C60 derivative.

Authors:  Tsukasa Futagoishi; Michihisa Murata; Atsushi Wakamiya; Yasujiro Murata
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  An optimised scalable synthesis of H2O@C60 and a new synthesis of H2@C60.

Authors:  Andrea Krachmalnicoff; Malcolm H Levitt; Richard J Whitby
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Encapsulation of molecular hydrogen in fullerene C60 by organic synthesis.

Authors:  Koichi Komatsu; Michihisa Murata; Yasujiro Murata
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Rational synthesis, enrichment, and (13)C NMR spectra of endohedral C(60) and C(70) encapsulating a helium atom.

Authors:  Yuta Morinaka; Fumiyuki Tanabe; Michihisa Murata; Yasujiro Murata; Koichi Komatsu
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 8.  Current status and future developments of endohedral metallofullerenes.

Authors:  Xing Lu; Lai Feng; Takeshi Akasaka; Shigeru Nagase
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 54.564

9.  SpinDynamica: Symbolic and numerical magnetic resonance in a Mathematica environment.

Authors:  Christian Bengs; Malcolm H Levitt
Journal:  Magn Reson Chem       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.447

10.  First Synthesis and Characterization of CH4 @C60.

Authors:  Sally Bloodworth; Gabriela Sitinova; Shamim Alom; Sara Vidal; George R Bacanu; Stuart J Elliott; Mark E Light; Julie M Herniman; G John Langley; Malcolm H Levitt; Richard J Whitby
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 15.336

View more
  7 in total

1.  First Synthesis and Characterization of CH4 @C60.

Authors:  Sally Bloodworth; Gabriela Sitinova; Shamim Alom; Sara Vidal; George R Bacanu; Stuart J Elliott; Mark E Light; Julie M Herniman; G John Langley; Malcolm H Levitt; Richard J Whitby
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 2.  Stereochemistry of Simple Molecules inside Nanotubes and Fullerenes: Unusual Behavior of Usual Systems.

Authors:  Valerij Kuznetsov
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 4.411

3.  A Solid-State Intramolecular Wittig Reaction Enables Efficient Synthesis of Endofullerenes Including Ne@C60 , 3 He@C60 , and HD@C60.

Authors:  Gabriela Hoffman; Mark C Walkey; John Gräsvik; George R Bacanu; Shamim Alom; Sally Bloodworth; Mark E Light; Malcolm H Levitt; Richard J Whitby
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Comparison Between Electride Characteristics of Li3@B40 and Li3@C60.

Authors:  Prasenjit Das; Pratim Kumar Chattaraj
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 5.221

5.  An orifice design: water insertion into C60.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Hashikawa; Kazuro Kizaki; Takashi Hirose; Yasujiro Murata
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  Unraveling the Origin of Symmetry Breaking in H2 O@C60 Endofullerene Through Quantum Computations.

Authors:  Orlando Carrillo-Bohórquez; Álvaro Valdés; Rita Prosmiti
Journal:  Chemphyschem       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.520

Review 7.  New Horizons in Chemical Functionalization of Endohedral Metallofullerenes.

Authors:  Michio Yamada; Michael T H Liu; Shigeru Nagase; Takeshi Akasaka
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 4.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.