Literature DB >> 30772345

Brillouin Spectroscopy of Normal and Keratoconus Corneas.

Theo G Seiler1, Peng Shao2, Amira Eltony2, Theo Seiler3, Seok-Hyun Yun2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the age dependence of Brillouin spectroscopy of the cornea and to compare normal and keratoconus corneas.
DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study.
METHODS: Study Population: Healthy patients and patients suffering from keratoconus seen at the Institut für Refraktive und Ophthalmo-Chirurgie (IROC) between December 2016 and March 2017. Brillouin frequency shifts of patients of 2 different groups were examined with Brillouin spectroscopy perpendicular to the corneal surface. Group 1 consisted of 47 healthy eyes, whereas Group 2 included 36 eyes with keratoconus of unclear progression. Besides Brillouin examinations, corneal tomographies were acquired so that correlations and comparisons between geometric parameters and Brillouin frequency shifts could be evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Corneal Brillouin frequency shifts averaged over full corneal thickness.
RESULTS: A significant correlation between age and central Brillouin frequency shift was identified (P = .011) with an increase in Brillouin frequency shift of 4 MHz per decade in normal corneas. Keratoconus corneas have a significantly reduced Brillouin frequency shift at the thinnest point compared to normal corneas (5.7072 ± 0.0214 vs 5.7236 ± 0.0146 GHz, P < .001). The Brillouin frequency shift at the point of maximum posterior elevation showed best correlation with geometry-derived keratoconus indices. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of Brillouin frequency shift showed substantially worse sensitivity and specificity compared to Kmax and thinnest pachymetry for keratoconus detection.
CONCLUSION: Noninvasive Brillouin spectroscopy adds clinical information about the biomechanical state of the cornea perpendicular to the surface. An age-dependent stiffening of the cornea has been found and keratoconus corneas are statistically significantly different from normal corneas, but for precise differentiating of keratoconus stages (including normal corneas) the method is currently neither specific nor sensitive enough. Further development including standardized mapping and establishment of new indices may increase the potential of Brillouin spectroscopy substantially.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30772345      PMCID: PMC6548649          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  27 in total

1.  Understanding age-induced alterations to the biomechanical barrier function of human stratum corneum.

Authors:  Krysta Biniek; Joseph Kaczvinsky; Paul Matts; Reinhold H Dauskardt
Journal:  J Dermatol Sci       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 4.563

2.  Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Cynthia J Roberts
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 3.  Biomechanical properties of the keratoconic cornea: a review.

Authors:  Hans R Vellara; Dipika V Patel
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  A comparison of the elastic properties of human choroid and sclera.

Authors:  T R Friberg; J W Lace
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Ocular rigidity in living human eyes.

Authors:  Ioannis G Pallikaris; George D Kymionis; Harilaos S Ginis; George A Kounis; Miltiadis K Tsilimbaris
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Detection of Keratoconus With a New Biomechanical Index.

Authors:  Riccardo Vinciguerra; Renato Ambrósio; Ahmed Elsheikh; Cynthia J Roberts; Bernardo Lopes; Emanuela Morenghi; Claudio Azzolini; Paolo Vinciguerra
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  The influence of hydration on different mechanical moduli of the cornea.

Authors:  Theo G Seiler; Peng Shao; Beatrice E Frueh; Seok-Hyun Yun; Theo Seiler
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Assessing corneal biomechanics with Brillouin spectro-microscopy.

Authors:  Guillaume Lepert; Ricardo M Gouveia; Che J Connon; Carl Paterson
Journal:  Faraday Discuss       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.008

9.  Spatially resolved Brillouin spectroscopy to determine the rheological properties of the eye lens.

Authors:  Stephan Reiß; Gerolf Burau; Oliver Stachs; Rudolf Guthoff; Heinrich Stolz
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 10.  Scheimpflug imaging for keratoconus and ectatic disease.

Authors:  Michael W Belin; Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.848

View more
  13 in total

1.  Vectorial birefringence imaging by optical coherence microscopy for assessing fibrillar microstructures in the cornea and limbus.

Authors:  Qingyun Li; Karol Karnowski; Gavrielle Untracht; Peter B Noble; Barry Cense; Martin Villiger; David D Sampson
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Multi-meridian corneal imaging of air-puff induced deformation for improved detection of biomechanical abnormalities.

Authors:  Andrea Curatolo; Judith S Birkenfeld; Eduardo Martinez-Enriquez; James A Germann; Geethika Muralidharan; Jesús Palací; Daniel Pascual; Ashkan Eliasy; Ahmed Abass; Jędrzej Solarski; Karol Karnowski; Maciej Wojtkowski; Ahmed Elsheikh; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  [Statistical analysis of correlated measurement data in ophthalmology : Tutorial for the application of the linear mixed model in SPSS and R using corneal biomechanical parameters].

Authors:  R Herber; A Kaiser; X Grählert; U Range; F Raiskup; L E Pillunat; E Spörl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 4.  [Treatment indications for corneal crosslinking and clinical results of new corneal crosslinking techniques].

Authors:  Klara Borgardts; Johannes Menzel-Severing; Gerd Geerling; Theo G Seiler
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  High-frequency ultrasound detects biomechanical weakening in keratoconus with lower stiffness at higher grade.

Authors:  Sunny Kwok; Xueliang Pan; William Liu; Andrew Hendershot; Jun Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Characterization of cone size and centre in keratoconic corneas.

Authors:  Ashkan Eliasy; Ahmed Abass; Bernardo T Lopes; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Haixia Zhang; Paolo Vinciguerra; Renato Ambrósio; Cynthia J Roberts; Ahmed Elsheikh
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 7.  A review of imaging modalities for detecting early keratoconus.

Authors:  Xuemin Zhang; Saleha Z Munir; Syed A Sami Karim; Wuqaas M Munir
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  The Role of Corneal Biomechanics for the Evaluation of Ectasia Patients.

Authors:  Marcella Q Salomão; Ana Luisa Hofling-Lima; Louise Pellegrino Gomes Esporcatte; Bernardo Lopes; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Paolo Vinciguerra; Jens Bühren; Nelson Sena; Guilherme Simões Luz Hilgert; Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  Biomechanical diagnostics of the cornea.

Authors:  Louise Pellegrino Gomes Esporcatte; Marcella Q Salomão; Bernardo T Lopes; Paolo Vinciguerra; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Cynthia Roberts; Ahmed Elsheikh; Daniel G Dawson; Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2020-02-05

10.  Quasi-Static Optical Coherence Elastography to Characterize Human Corneal Biomechanical Properties.

Authors:  Sabine Kling; Emilio A Torres-Netto; Bogdan Spiru; Walter Sekundo; Farhad Hafezi
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.